Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:56:36.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus 3D conformal radiotherapy for selected childhood neoplasms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2014

Marzanna Chojnacka ,
Anna Zygmuntowicz-Piętka ,
Anna Semaniak ,
Katarzyna Pędziwiatr ,
Ryszard Dąbrowski  and
Anna Skowrońska-Gardas
Marzanna Chojnacka*
Affiliation:
Department of Radiotherapy, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center-Institute, Warsaw, Wawelska, Poland
Anna Zygmuntowicz-Piętka
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Physics, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center-Institute, Warsaw, Wawelska, Poland
Anna Semaniak
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Physics, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center-Institute, Warsaw, Wawelska, Poland
Katarzyna Pędziwiatr
Affiliation:
Department of Radiotherapy, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center-Institute, Warsaw, Wawelska, Poland
Ryszard Dąbrowski
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Physics, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center-Institute, Warsaw, Wawelska, Poland
Anna Skowrońska-Gardas
Affiliation:
Department of Radiotherapy, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center-Institute, Warsaw, Wawelska, Poland
*
Correspondence to: Marzanna Chojnacka, Department of Radiotherapy, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center-Institute, 00-973 Warsaw, Wawelska 15, Poland. Tel/Fax: +48225709186. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aim

The comparative study of the plan quality between volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and 3D conformal therapy (3DCRT) for the treatment of selected representative childhood neoplasms was performed.

Materials and methods

During the year 2013, 44 children with neoplasms were irradiated using VMAT. The 3DCRT plans were created retrospectively and compared with the VMAT plans for four tumour locations. The conformity parameters, dose volume histograms for target volume and organs at risk, number of monitor units and time used to deliver the single fraction were evaluated and compared for each plan. Additionally, for patients with brain tumour the comparison of different arcs configuration was made.

Results

VMAT modality presented the superiority over older conformal methods with regard to the improvement in the dose conformity and normal tissue sparing. The noncoplanar arcs arrangement was beneficial in the decrease of high-dose volume and the protection of the organs at risk located oppositely to the target volume.

Findings

VMAT could be preferred technique for treating childhood neoplasms, especially when the complex-shaped target volume is localised close to the critical structures. The noncoplanar arcs arrangement could be the method of choice in the reirradiated patients and in these with laterally located brain tumours.

Keywords

VMATconformal radiotherapychildhood neoplasms
Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 35 - 42
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Hall, E J, Wuu, C S. Radiation-induced second cancers: the impact of 3D-CRT and IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 56: 83–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Palma, D A, Verbakel, W, Otto, K, Senan, S. New developments in arc radiation therapy: a review. Cancer Treat Rev 2010; 36: 393–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Teoh, M, Clark, C H, Wood, K, Whitaker, S, Nisbet, A. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of current literature and clinical use in practice. Br J Radiol 2011; 84 (1007): 967–996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Matuszak, M M, Yan, D, Grills, I, Martinez, A. Clinical applications of volumetric modulated arc therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 77 (2): 608–616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Beltran, C, Gray, J, Merchant, T. Intensity-modulated arc therapy for pediatric posterior fossa tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 82 (2): e299–e304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Shaffer, R, Vollans, E, Vellani, R, Welsh, M, Moiseenko, V, Goddard, K. A radiotherapy planning study of RapidArc, IMRT, 3-D conformal radiotherapy and parallel opposed beams in the treatment of pediatric retroperineal tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2011; 56: 16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Shaffer, R, Nichol, A M, Vollans, Eet al. A comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy for frontal and temporal high-grade gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 76 (4): 1177–1184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Van't Riet, A, Mak, C A, Moerland, M A, Elders, L H, van der Zee, W. A conformation number to quantify the degree of conformality in brachytherapy and external beam irradiation: application to the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 37 (3): 731–736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Wagner, D, Christiansen, H, Wolff, H, Vorwerk, H. Radiotherapy of malignant gliomas: comparison of volumetric single arc technique (RapidArc), dynamic intensity-modulated technique and 3D conformal technique. Radiother Oncol 2009; 93: 593–596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Galloway, T J, Indelicato, D J, Amdur, R J, Morris, C G, Swanson, E L, Marcus, R B. Analysis of dose at the site of second tumor formation after radiotherapy to the central nervous system. Int Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 82: 90–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Diallo, I, Haddy, N, Adjadj, Eet al. Frequency distribution of second solid cancer locations in relation to the irradiated volume among 115 patients treated for childhood cancer. Int Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 74: 876–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Pettorini, B L, Park, Y S, Caldarelli, M, Massimi, L, Tamburrini, G, Di Rocco, C. Radiation-induced tumors after central nervous system irradiation in childhood: a review. Childs Nerv Syst 2008; 24: 793–805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Merchant, T E, Conklin, H M, Wu, S, Lustig, R H, Xiong, X. Late effects of conformal radiation therapy for pediatric patients with low-grade glioma: prospective evaluation of cognitive, endocrine and hearing deficits. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 3691–3697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Qi, X S, Stinauer, M, Rogers, B, Madden, J R, Wilkening, G N, Liu, A K. Potential for improved intelligence quotient using volumetric modulated arc therapy compared with conventional 3-dimensional conformal radiation for whole-ventricular radiation in children. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 84 (5): 1206–1211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Fogliata, A, Cozzi, L, Clivio, Let al. Preclinical assessment of volumetric modulated arc therapy for total marrow irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 80 (2): 628–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Aydogan, B, Yeginer, M, Kavak, G O, Fan, J, Radosevich, J A, Gwe-Ya, K. Total marrow irradiation with RapidArc volumetric arc therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 81 (2): 592–599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed