Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T23:05:54.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Personalising margins for bladder radiotherapy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2010

CA Sale ,
T ffrench  and
R Voss
CA Sale*
Affiliation:
Andrew Love Cancer Centre, Geelong Hospital, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
T ffrench
Affiliation:
Andrew Love Cancer Centre, Geelong Hospital, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
R Voss
Affiliation:
Andrew Love Cancer Centre, Geelong Hospital, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
*
Correspondence to: CA Sale, Research Education Radiation Therapist, Andrew Love Cancer Centre, Geelong Hospital, Ryrie Street Geelong 3220, VIC Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This patient case study represents the introduction of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) at the Andrew Love Cancer Centre (ALCC) with non-uniform margins for invasive bladder cancer treatment. Invasive bladder cancer has historically had poor local control with radiotherapy treatment; however, with the introduction of cone-beam computer tomography (CBCT) and adaptive treatment, there is potential for improvements in disease control and reduced toxicities.

Keywords

Adaptive radiotherapyCone Beam Computer Tomography (CBCT)Invasive bladder cancer
Type
Case Report
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 137 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kotwal, S, Choudhury, A, Johnston, C, Paul, AB, Whelan, P, Kiltie, AE. Similar treatment outcomes for radical cystectomy and radical radiotherapy in invasive bladder cancer treated at a United Kingdom specialist treatment center. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 70:456–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayter, CR, Paszat, LF, Groome, PA, Schulze, K, Mackillop, WJ. The management and outcome of bladder carcinoma in Ontario, 1982–1994. Cancer 2000; 89:142–151.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scrimger, RA, Murtha, AD, Parliament, MB, Venner, PM, Hanson, J, Houle, G, Chetner, M. Muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder: a population- based study of patterns of care and prognostic factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001; 51:23–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sengeløv, L, von der Maase, H. Radiotherapy in bladder cancer. Radiother Oncol 1999; 52:1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, S. Defining the Optimal CTV for Bladder Cancer. Faculty of Radiation Oncology Genito-Urinary Special Interest Groups (FROGG) Workshop, 2009.Google Scholar
Foroudi, F, Wong, J, Kron, T et al. Development and evaluation of a training program for therapeutic radiographers as a basis for online adaptive radiation therapy for bladder carcinoma. Radiography 2010; 16:14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pos, FJ, Hulshof, M, Lebesque, J, Lotz, H, van Tienhoven, G, Moonen, L, Remeijer, P. Adaptive radiotherapy for invasive bladder cancer: a feasibility study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 64:862–868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed