Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:45:57.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improved peripheral dose calculation accuracy for a small MLC field brought by the latest commercial treatment planning system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2006

J. C. L. Chow ,
G. N. Grigorov  and
R. Jiang
J. C. L. Chow
Affiliation:
Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Ontario, Canada; Physics Department, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada;
G. N. Grigorov
Affiliation:
Medical Physics Department, Grand River Hospital, Ontario, Canada
R. Jiang
Affiliation:
Physics Department, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; Medical Physics Department, Grand River Hospital, Ontario, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A recently released Pinnacle treatment planning system software, v7.4f includes some new physics features such as modeling of the rounded multi-leaf collimator (MLC) leaf ends and the tongue-and-groove structure between leaves. In this study, the above physics modeling improvements were verified by comparing the peripheral dose profiles for the small MLC fields calculated by the new Pinnacle v7.4f and the old Pinnacle v6.2b with those obtained from measurements experimentally. Three test MLC fields with different jaw sizes were prepared, and specific dose profiles (along cross-line, in-line and diagonal axis) at different depths were measured using a Varian 21 EX linear accelerator with 120-leaf Millennium MLC, big scanning water tank and photon diode. Estimated dose profiles for the test fields were calculated using Pinnacle v6.2b and v7.4f. By comparing the measured and calculated results, it was found that both v6.2b and v7.4f performed well in calculating the cross-line (along the gap between the longitudinal lengths of two leaves) and diagonal axis dose profiles at different depths. However, v7.4f gave calculated dose values closer to the measured field for in-line (gap between junctions of two rounded leaf ends) axis dose profiles at different depths. For the shape of the profile along the in-line axis, v7.4f calculated a flat “platform” dose profile of about 34.3% (inter-bank leakage) at depth dmax> beyond the MLC field edge using a clinical dose grid size of 0.4×0.4×0.4cm3, compared to the “zigzag” dose profile varying between 35.4% and 42.1% measured using the water tank and diode. However, both Pinnacle v6.2b and v7.4f calculated the percentage depth dose for the test fields well compared to the measurements.

Keywords

Intensity modulated radiotherapymulti-leaf collimatortreatment planning software commissioning and dosimetry
Type
Original Article
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , June 2006 , pp. 121 - 128
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)