Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:53:23.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of inter-fraction set-up errors on the probability of pulmonary and cardiac complication in left-sided breast cancer patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2014

Crispen Chamunyonga
Crispen Chamunyonga*
Affiliation:
The Cancer Centre, Nassau, Bahamas
*
Correspondence to: Crispen Chamunyonga, The Cancer Centre Bahamas, 72 Collins Avenue, Nassau, Bahamas. Tel: +1242 5029610. Fax: +1242 5029619. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Purpose

This study evaluated the impact of patient set-up errors on the probability of pulmonary and cardiac complications in the irradiation of left-sided breast cancer.

Methods and materials

Using the CMS XiO Version 4·6 radiotherapy planning system's normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) algorithm and the Lyman–Kutcher–Burman model, we calculated the dose–volume histograms (DVH) indices for the ipsilateral lung and heart and the resultant NTCP for radiation-induced pneumonitis and excess cardiac mortality in 12 left-sided breast cancer patients.

Results

Isocentric shifts in the posterior direction had the greatest effect on the lung V20, heart V25, and mean and maximum doses to the lung and the heart. DVH results show that the ipsilateral lung V20 tolerance was exceeded in 58% of the patients after 1 cm posterior shifts. Similarly, the heart V25 tolerance was exceeded after 1 cm antero-posterior and left–right isocentric shifts in 70% of the patients. The baseline NTCPs for radiation-induced pneumonitis ranged from 0·73% to 3·4%, with a mean value of 1·7%. The maximum reported NTCP for radiation-induced pneumonitis was 5·8% (mean 2·6%) after 1 cm posterior isocentric shift. The NTCP for excess cardiac mortality were 0% in 100% of the patients (n = 12) before and after set-up error simulations.

Conclusions

Set-up errors in left-sided breast cancer patients have a statistically significant impact on the Lung NTCPs and DVH indices. However, with a central lung distance of 3 cm or less (CLD < 3 cm), and a maximum heart distance of 1·5 cm or less (MHD < 1·5 cm), the treatment plans could tolerate set-up errors of up to 1 cm without any change in the NTCP to the heart.

Keywords

breast cancer radiotherapyexcess cardiac mortalityNTCPradiation pneumonitis
Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 393 - 402
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Magee, B, Coyle, C, Kirby, C et al. Use of portal imaging to assess cardiac irradiation in breast radiotherapy. Clin Oncol 1997; 9: 259–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Baroni, G, Garibaldi, C, Scabini, M et al. Dosimetric effects within target and organ at risk of interfractional patient mispositioning in left breast cancer radiotherapy. Int J Rad Onc 2004; 59 (3): 861–871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Truong, PT, Berthelet, E, Patenaude, V et al. Set up variations in locoregional radiotherapy for breast cancer; an electronic portal imaging study. Br J Radiol 2005; 78: 742–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Darby, SC, Ewertz, M, McGale, P et al. Risk of ischemic heart disease in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2013; 368 (11): 987–998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Lu Ming, H, Cash, E, Chen, HM, et al. Reduction of cardiac volume in left breast treatment fields by respiratory manoeuvres: A CT study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 47 (4): 895–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Gargliadi, G, Lax, I, Soderstroom, S et al. Prediction of excess risk of long-term cardiac mortality after radiotherapy of stage 1 breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 1998; 46: 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Schultz-Hector, S, Trott, KR. Radiation-induced cardiovascular diseases: is the epidemiologic evidence compatible with the radiologic data? Int J Radiati Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 67: 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Muren, LP, Maurstad, G, Halfslund, R et al. Cardiac and pulmonary doses and complication probabilities in standard and conformal tangential irradiation in conservative management of breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 2001; 62 (2): 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Gagliardi, G, Bjohle, J, Ottolenghi, A. Radiation pneumonitis after breast cancer irradiation analysis of the complication probability using the relative seriality model. Int J Radiati Onc Biol Phys 2000; 46 (2): 373–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Burman, C, Kutcher, GJ, Emami, B et al. Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to an analytic function. Int J Radiother Onco Biol Phys 1991; 21 (2): 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Van der Laan, PH, Van't Veld, AA, Bijl, HP. Comparison of normal tissue dose with three dimensional conformal techniques for breast cancer irradiation including the internal mammary nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 63: 1522–1530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Kukolowicz, PF, Debrowski, A, Gut, P et al. Evaluation of set-up deviations during the irradiation of patients suffering from breast cancer treated with two different techniques. Radiother Oncol 2005; 75: 22–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Bentzen, SM, Constine, LS, Deasy, JO et al. Quantitative analysis of normal tissue effects in the clinic (QUANTEC): an introduction of the scientific issues. Int J Rad Onc 2010; 76 (3): S3–S9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Kwa, SLS, Theuws, JCM, Wagenaar, A et al. Evaluation of two dose–volume histogram reduction models for the prediction of radiation pneumonitis. Radiother Oncol 1998; 48: 61–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Gagliardi, G, Constine, LS, Moiseenko, V et al. Radiation dose–volume effects in the heart. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 76 (3): S77–S85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Muralidah, KR, Narayana, P, Alluri, K et al. Comparative study of convolution, superposition and fast super position algorithms in conventional radiotherapy, three dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy techniques for various sites, done on CMS Xio Planning System. Med Phys 2009; 34 (1): 12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Marks, LB, Bentzen, SN, Deasy, JO et al. Radiation volume effects in the lung. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 76 (3): S70–S76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Hector, CL, Webb, S, Evans, PM. The dosimetric consequences of inter-fractional patient movement on conventional and intensity-modulated breast radiotherapy treatments. Radiother Oncol 2000; 54: 57–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Prabhakar, R, Rath, GK, Julka, PK. Simulation of dose to surrounding normal structures in tangential breast radiotherapy due to set-up error. Radiother Oncol 2002; 62: 173–183.Google Scholar
20. Semenenko, VA, Li, XA. Lyman–Kutcher–Burman NTCP model parameters for radiation pneumonitis and xerostomia based on combined analysis of published clinical data. Phys Med Biol 2008; 53: 737–755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Brink, C, Nielsen, M. Sensitivity of NTCP parameter values against change of dose calculation algorithm. Med Phys 2007; 34: 3579–3586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Canney, PA, Deehan, C, Glegg, M et al. Reducing cardiac dose in post operative irradiation of breast cancer patients: the relative importance of patient positioning and CT scan planning. Br J Radiol 1999; 72: 986–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Hurkmans, CW, Borger, HJ, Bos, JL et al. Cardiac and lung complication probabilities after breast cancer irradiation. Radiother Oncol 2000; 55 (2): 145–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. O Kyu, N, Sung, P, Seung, DN et al. Probability of pulmonary and cardiac complications and radiographic parameters in breast cancer radiotherapy. J Radiat Oncol 2010; 1: 23–31.Google Scholar
25. Graham, MV, Purdy, JA, Emami, B et al. Clinical dose–volume histograms for pneumonitis after 3D treatment for non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999; 45 (2): 323–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Raj, KA, Evans, ES, Prosnitz, RG et al. Is there an increased risk of recurrence under the heart block in patients with left-sided breast cancer? Cancer J 2006; 12 (4): 309–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Andratscheke, N, Maurer, J, Molls, M et al. Late radiation induced heart disease after radiotherapy. Clinical importance of radiobiological mechanism and strategies of prevention. Radiother Oncol 2006; 100 (2): 160–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar