Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:36:38.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clinical and radiological response of aggressive dural arteriovenous fistula after combined glue embolization and hypofractionated helical TomoTherapy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2021

Withawat Vuthiwong Open the ORCID record for Withawat Vuthiwong [Opens in a new window] ,
Anirut Watcharawipha ,
Bongkot Jia- Mahasap ,
Wannapha Nobnop  and
Imjai Chitapanarux Open the ORCID record for Imjai Chitapanarux [Opens in a new window]
Withawat Vuthiwong
Affiliation:
Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Interventional Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
Anirut Watcharawipha
Affiliation:
Division of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand Northern Thai Research Group of Radiation Oncology (NTRG-RO), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
Bongkot Jia- Mahasap
Affiliation:
Division of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand Northern Thai Research Group of Radiation Oncology (NTRG-RO), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
Wannapha Nobnop
Affiliation:
Division of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand Northern Thai Research Group of Radiation Oncology (NTRG-RO), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
Imjai Chitapanarux*
Affiliation:
Division of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand Northern Thai Research Group of Radiation Oncology (NTRG-RO), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
*
Author for correspondence: Imjai Chitapanarux, M.D., Division of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 110 Intawarorose Road, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand. Tel: +66-53-935456; Fax: +66-53-935491. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Purpose:

We reported the clinical and radiological outcome of an aggressive dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF) after combined glue embolization and hypofractionated helical TomoTherapy (Hypo-HT).

Materials and methods:

Eleven patients whose radiological examinations are consistent with aggressive DAVF were treated with combined glue embolization and Hypo-HT 30–36 Gy in 5–6 fractions. The dosimetric analysis, clinical response and radiological imaging obliteration rate by magnetic resonance angiography or computed tomography angiography were investigated.

Results:

There were eight males and three females with a male and female ratio of 2·67. The mean age was 51·2 years old (range 37–69). Anatomical imaging sites of disease included transverse-sigmoid sinuses (n = 7), superior sagittal sinus (n = 3) and tentorium cerebelli (n = 1). The mean pitch and MF of treatment plans were 0·273 ± 0·032 and 1·70 ± 0·31, respectively. The average size of PTV were 15·39 ± 7·74 cc whereas the Reff,PTV was 1·50 ± 0·25 cm. The average Dmax and Dmin were 37·52 ± 3·34 and 31·77 ± 2·64 Gy, respectively. HI, CI and CI50 were 0·16 ± 0·06, 1·80 ± 0·56 and 7·85 ± 4·16, respectively. The Reff,Rx and Reff,50%Rx were 1·80 ± 0·24 and 2·90 ± 0·45 cm, respectively. The Reff between 50%Rx and 100%Rx was 1·10 ± 0·28 cm on average. With a mean follow up of 28·5 months (range 9–48), the complete recovery of symptoms was found in 72·7 % (eight patients) within 2–12 months after completion Hypo-HT. Partial recovery was reported in 18·2% (two patients). No clinical response was found in 9·1% (one patient). The total radiographic obliteration rate was 27·3% (three patients), subtotal obliteration was 27·3% (three patients) and partial obliteration was 45·4% (five patients).

Conclusions:

Satisfactory clinical response of aggressive DAVF was found in all treated patients by combining glue embolization and Hypo-HT. All dosimetric parameters were acceptable. We still need an extended follow up time to assess further radiographic obliteration rate and late side effects of the treatment.

Keywords

dural arteriovenous fistulaglue embolizationhypofractionation helical TomoTherapyinter-cranial vascular malformations
Type
Original Article
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , December 2022 , pp. 513 - 518
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gupta, A, Periakaruppan, A. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: a review. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2009; 19 (1): 43–48.Google ScholarPubMed
Luciani, A, Houdart, E, Mounayer, C, Saint Maurice, J-P, Merland, J-J. Spontaneous closure of dural arteriovenous fistulas: report of three cases and review of the literature. Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22 (5): 992–996.Google ScholarPubMed
Rohr, J, Gauthier, G. Spontaneous regression of a dura mater arteriovenous fistula of the posterior fossa. Revue Neurologique 1985; 141 (3): 240–244.Google ScholarPubMed
Elhammady, MS, Ambekar, S, Heros, RC. Epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and prognosis of cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. 143: Elsevier; 2017:99–105.Google Scholar
Kim, MS, Han, DH, Kwon, O-K, Oh, C-W, Han, MH. Clinical characteristics of dural arteriovenous fistula. J Clin Neurosci 2002; 9 (2): 147–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarma, D, ter Brugge, K. Management of intracranial dural arteriovenous shunts in adults. Eur J Radiol 2003; 46 (3): 206–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gandhi, D, Chen, J, Pearl, M, Huang, J, Gemmete, J, Kathuria, S. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: classification, imaging findings, and treatment. Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33 (6): 1007–1013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houser, O, Campbell, J, Campbell, R, Sundt, T Jr, editors. Arteriovenous malformation affecting the transverse dural venous sinus--an acquired lesion. Mayo Clin Proc 1979; 54 (10): 651–661.Google Scholar
Lasjaunias, P, Chiu, M, Ter Brugge, K, Tolia, A, Hurth, M, Bernstein, M. Neurological manifestations of intracranial dural arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1986; 64 (5): 724–730.Google ScholarPubMed
Malik, GM, Pearce, JE, Ausman, JI, Mehta, B. Dural arteriovenous malformations and intracranial hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1984; 15 (3): 332–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniels, DJ, Vellimana, AK, Zipfel, GJ, Lanzino, G. Intracranial hemorrhage from dural arteriovenous fistulas: clinical features and outcome. Neurosurg Focus 2013; 34 (5): E15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baltsavias, G, Spiessberger, A, Hothorn, T, Valavanis, A. Cranial dural arteriovenous shunts. Part 4. Clinical presentation of the shunts with leptomeningeal venous drainage. Neurosurg Rev 2015; 38 (2): 283–291.Google ScholarPubMed
Miller, TR, Gandhi, D. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae: clinical presentation and management strategies. Stroke 2015; 46 (7): 2017–2025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baharvahdat, H, Ooi, YC, Kim, WJ, Mowla, A, Coon, AL, Colby, GP. Updates in the management of cranial dural arteriovenous fistula. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2020; 5 (1): 50–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Link, MJ, Coffey, RJ, Nichols, DA, Gorman, DA. The role of radiosurgery and particulate embolization in the treatment of dural arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurosurg 1996; 84 (5): 804–809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, JA, Pollock, BE, Nichols, DA, Gorman, DA, Foote, RL, Stafford, SL. Results of combined stereotactic radiosurgery and transarterial embolization for dural arteriovenous fistulas of the transverse and sigmoid sinuses. J Neurosurg 2001; 94 (6): 886–891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, H, Kano, H, Kondziolka, D et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery with or without embolization for intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas. Prog Neurol Surg 2013; 27: 195–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodapp, N. [The ICRU Report 83: prescribing, recording and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)]. Strahlenther Onkol 2012; 188 (1): 97–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, JM, terBrugge, KG, Willinsky, RA, Wallace, MC. Clinical course of cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas with long-term persistent cortical venous reflux. Stroke 2002; 33 (5): 1233–1236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koebbe, CJ, Singhal, D, Sheehan, J et al. Radiosurgery for dural arteriovenous fistulas. Surg Neurol 2005; 64 (5): 392–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, WY, Pan, DH, Wu, HM et al. Radiosurgery as a treatment alternative for dural arteriovenous fistulas of the cavernous sinus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998; 19 (6): 1081–1087.Google ScholarPubMed
O’leary, S, Hodgson, TJ, Coley, SC, Kemeny, AA, Radatz, MW. Intracranial dural arteriovenous malformations: results of stereotactic radiosurgery in 17 patients. Clin Oncol 2002; 14 (2): 97–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, SH, Park, KS, Kang, DH, Hwang, JH, Hwang, SK. Stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: its clinical and angiographic perspectives. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2017; 159 (6): 1093–1103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pan, DH, Chung, WY, Guo, WY et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of dural arteriovenous fistulas involving the transverse-sigmoid sinus. J Neurosurg 2002; 96 (5): 823–829.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baek, HG, Park, SH, Park, KS, Kang, DH, Hwang, JH, Hwang, SK. Stereotactic radiosurgery for dural arteriovenous fistulas involving the transverse-sigmoid sinus: a single center experience and review of the literatures. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2019; 62 (4): 458–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollock, BE, Kondziolka, D, Flickinger, JC, Patel, AK, Bissonette, DJ, Lunsford, LD. Magnetic resonance imaging: an accurate method to evaluate arteriovenous malformations after stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 1996; 85 (6): 1044–1049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sung, KS, Choi, JH, Song, YJ, Kim, KU. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for dural arteriovenous fistula in the superior sagittal sinus: case report and review of the literature. Br J Neurosurg 2019: 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, TA, Jensen, AR, Bellairs, EE, Ozer, M. Dose gradient index for stereotactic radiosurgery/radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 106 (3): 604–611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, CJ, Lee, CC, Ding, D et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: a systematic review. J Neurosurg 2015; 122 (2): 353–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cifarelli, CP, Kaptain, G, Yen, CP, Schlesinger, D, Sheehan, JP. Gamma knife radiosurgery for dural arteriovenous fistulas. Neurosurgery 2010; 67 (5): 1230–1235; discussion 5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanakita, S, Koga, T, Shin, M, Shojima, M, Igaki, H, Saito, N. Role of Gamma Knife surgery in the treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurosurg 2012; 117 Suppl: 158–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed