Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:04:05.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The automated patient discharge summary: improving communication at transfers of care after completion of radiotherapy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Natalie Rozanec ,
Edwin Chan ,
Shaziya Malam  and
James Loudon
Natalie Rozanec*
Affiliation:
Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, ON, Canada Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom
Edwin Chan
Affiliation:
Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, ON, Canada
Shaziya Malam
Affiliation:
Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, ON, Canada Athabasca University, Athabasca, AB, Canada
James Loudon
Affiliation:
Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, ON, Canada
*
Correspondence to: Natalie Rozanec, MRT(T), Advanced Practice Radiation Therapist (Palliative), Radiation Therapy Department, Southlake Regional Health Centre, 596 Davis Drive, Newmarket, ON Canada L3Y 2P9. Tel: (905) 895 4521. Fax: (905) 952 3058. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aim

To develop an auto-generated patient discharge summary for all patients being treated in the Radiation Therapy Department.

Materials and methods

A patient discharge summary was developed using auto-generated data for all patients being treated in the Radiation Therapy Department. This ensures information relevant to the care of the patient is communicated effectively during transitions of care following radiation treatment, and provides a record of the treatment site(s), dose delivered, start/completion dates and contact information for Radiation Oncologists. The eScribe feature in MosaiQTM is utilised to auto-generate the patient discharge summary in less than one minute, and then printed and given to patients on the last day of treatment. This was piloted with palliative radiotherapy patients (n=22), who also completed a telephone survey.

Results

Results revealed patients had passed this document onto other healthcare providers and appreciated having a record of their treatments. Feedback was obtained from radiation therapy staff and the Patient and Family Advisory Committee. Subsequently, the language of the patient discharge summary was simplified and a disclaimer was added, indicating the document is not a complete radiation therapy treatment record. This initiative was then rolled out to all radiotherapy patients.

Findings

Overall, the patient discharge summary allows for a quick, automated and standardised approach for transfer of information during care transitions without significant impact to the Radiation Therapy Departmental workflow.

Keywords

communicationpatient discharge summaryradiotherapy
Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 265 - 271
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Barton, M B, Hudson, H M, Delaney, G, Gruver, P, Liu, Z. Patterns of retreatment by radiotherapy. Clin Oncol 2011; 23 (1): 10–18.Google Scholar
2. Tindale, J. Community nurses and the electronic discharge summary. Primary Health Care 2012; 22 (7): 25–27.Google Scholar
3. Nekhlyudov, L, Schnipper, J L. Cancer survivorship care plans: what can be learned from hospital discharge summaries? J Oncol Pract 2012; 8 (1): 24–29.Google Scholar
4. van der Linden, Y M, Steenland, E, van Houwelingen, H C et al. Patients with a favourable prognosis are equally palliated with single and multiple fraction radiotherapy: results on survival in the dutch bone metastasis study. Radiother Oncol 2006; 78 (3): 245–253.Google Scholar
5. Moore, C, Wisnivesky, J, Williams, S et al. Medical errors related to discontinuity of care from an inpatient to an outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18: 646–651.Google Scholar
6. Carpenito-Moyet, L. Handbook of Nursing Diagnosis, 13th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Williams, 2010.Google Scholar
7. Hall, W, Keane, P, Wang, S, Debell, F, Allana, A, Karia, P. Intensive care discharges: improving the quality of clinical handover through changes to discharge documentation. BMJ Qual Improv Rep 2015; 4 (1): u209711–w4036.Google Scholar
8. Lo, S, Diane, L S, Rodriguez, L. The impact of diagnosis-specific discharge instruction of patient satisfaction. J Perianesth Nurs 2009; 24 (3): 156–162.Google Scholar
9. Hewitt, M, Greenfield, S, Stovall, E. (eds). From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press, 2005.Google Scholar
10. Lau, M, Bezjak, A. Enhancing continuity of care with the use of palliative radiotherapy treatment summaries (PaRTS). J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2014; 46: 182.Google Scholar
11. van der Linden, Y M, Lok, J J, Steenland, E et al. Single fraction radiotherapy is efficacious: a further analysis of the dutch bone metastasis study controlling for the influence of retreatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 59 (2): 528–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Hernanz, R, Montero, A, Fernandez-Lizarbe, E, Polo, A, Ramos, A. Retreatment with radiotherapy for symptomatic bone, brain or visceral metastases. Clin Transl Oncol 2013; 15: 72–78.Google Scholar
13. Lamont, E B, Hayreh, D, Pickett, K E et al. Is patient travel distance associated with survival on phase II clinical trials in oncology? J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95 (18): 1370–1375.Google Scholar
14.IMPAC Medical System. Document management: eSCRIBE/eSCAN training module. Sunnyvale, California: IMPAC Medical System; 2015.Google Scholar
15. Chan, E H, Malam, S, Loudon, J. Implementing radiation oncology care plans as a foundation for process improvement. J Radiother Pract 2016; 15 (1): 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar