Article contents
Does a radiographer-led palliative radiotherapy pathway provide an efficient service for patients with symptoms of advanced cancer? The Northampton experience
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 May 2020
Abstract
To investigate whether a radiographer-led radiotherapy pathway can provide an efficient service for patients requiring treatment for symptomatic skeletal metastases.
A retrospective review of 425 courses of palliative radiotherapy was conducted. Data was analysed assessing diagnosis, dose/fractionation, time from referral to treatment, gender, age, inpatient/outpatient status and referring clinic location for radiographer- and clinical oncologist-led cohorts.
Patients aged ≥70 years were more likely to be planned by radiographers (n = 162/57, p < 0·001). Patients were more likely to be treated with 8 Gy in single fraction than with 20 Gy in five fractions (n = 279/136, p = 0·012). The median referral to treatment time in 8-Gy single-fraction prescriptions was 3 days for radiographer-led versus 7 days for clinical oncologist-led cohorts. In all patients and in 20 Gy in five-fraction prescriptions, it was 4 versus 8 days. A comparison of all prescriptions (p < 0·001), 8 Gy in single-fraction (p < 0·001) and 20 Gy in five-fraction prescriptions (p = 0·001) showed radiographer-led procedures as enabling faster access to treatment in each category.
A radiographer-led service can facilitate faster access to treatment than a clinical oncologist-led pathway for an appropriately selected patient caseload.
- Type
- Original Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
- 5
- Cited by