Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:38:49.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Policy Style and Issue Environment: The Electricity Supply Sector in West Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Stephen Padgett
Stephen Padgett
Affiliation:
European Studies, Loughborough University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This work examines the relationship between policy style and issue environment. Empirical research in the electricity supply sector in West Germany suggests that even at the sectoral level the expectation of a monolithic and static policy style cannot confidently be sustained. This sector displays a dual policy style, the source of which is located in the relationship between state and sector, the structure of interest representation, and ownership / market relations in the sector. Fluctuations in policy style are related to changes in the issue environment. Addressing the structural dimension of issues, the work abstracts the structure and form which issues assume from their substantive content to identify issue anatomy. This concept is deployed in an explanation of changing policy style in the face of a complex of sectoral issues.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , April 1990 , pp. 165 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bundesverband der deulschen Industrie, (1983) Energie und Wettbewerbsfähigkeit; eine kurze Fassung, Köln: BDI.Google Scholar
Bundesverband der deutschen Industrie, (1982) Energie und Wettbewerbsfähighkeit; Stimmen aus der Wirtschaft. Köln: BDI.Google Scholar
Bulmer, S. (1989) The Changing Agenda of West German Public Policy. Aldershot (Hants.): Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. L. (1988) Collapse ojan Industry; Nuclear Power and the Contradictions of U.S. Policy. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission of the European Communities, (1988) The Internal Energy Market; Commission Working Document, COM (88) 238. Brussels.Google Scholar
Deubner, C. (1984) Change and Internationalisation in Industry: towards a sectoral interpretation of West German politics. International Organisation, 38, 3, 501–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, K. H. F. (1981) The Politics of Economic Management in West Germany. In Paterson, W. E. & Smith, G. (eds.), The West German Model Perspectives on a Stable State. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Freeman, G. P. (1985) National Styles and Policy Sectors: Explaining Structured Variation, Journal of Public Policy 5, 4, 467–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, W., Paterson, W. & Whiston, C. (1987) Government-Industry Relations in the Chemical Industry: an Anglo-German Comparison. In Wilks, S. & Wright, M. (eds.), Comparative Government-Industry Relations: Western Europe, United States and Japan. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Grant, W., Martinelli, A. & Paterson, W. (1989) Large Firms as Political Actors; a Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Industry in Britiain, Italy and West Germany. West European Politics 12, 2, 72–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, G. & Richardson, J. J. (1982) The British Policy Style or the Logic of Negotiations? In Richardson, J. J. (ed.), Policy Styles in Western Europe. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P. J. (ed.) (1978) Between Power and Plenty: The Foreign Economic Policies of the Advanced Industrial States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Klaue, S. (1980) Die “neue” Misbrauchsaufsicht nach $103 GWB über Untemehmen der Versorgungswirtschaft, Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen, 30, 8, 586–91.Google Scholar
Liesen, K. (1988) Energiewirtschaft und Europa – Perspektiven und Probleme, Zeitschrifl für Energiewirtschaft 12, 1, 6–10.Google Scholar
Lowi, T. (1964) American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies, and Political Theory, World Politics, 6, 677–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupberger, D. L. (1980) Mehr Wettbewerb in der leitungsgebundenden Energiewirtschaft, Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragung 30, 6, 407–16.Google Scholar
Mez, L. (1984) RWE - Ein Riese mil Ausstrahlung. Köln: Kölner Volksblatt-Verlag.Google Scholar
Markert, K. (1988) lndustriestrompreise und Kartcllrecht: Rechtferligungsgründe für Preisdifferenzierungen, Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen, 38, Heft 2, 117–34.Google Scholar
Recknagel, H. (1988) Versorgungswirtschafl und Wettbewerb; Entdeckungsverfahren für den Geselzgeber, Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen 38, 5, 385–392.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. J. & Watts, N. (1985) Policy Styles and Environment Policy, (Berlin, Intemationalen Institut für Umwelt und Gesellschaft)Google Scholar
Röhling, E. & Mohnfeld, J. (1985) Energy policy and the energy economy in FR Germany, Energy Policy, December, 535–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, R. (1985) The Programme Approach to the Growth of Government, British Journal of Political Science, 15, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, W. (1984) Industrial Relations in West Germany. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. and Schmitter, P. C. (1985) Community, market, state – and associations? The prospective contribution of interest governance to social order. In Streeck, W. & Schmitter, P. C.Private Interest Government; Beyond Market and State. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Wilks, S. and Wright, M. (1987) Comparative Government-Industry Relations; Western Europe, United States and Japan. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wright, M. (1988) Policy Community, Policy Network and Comparative Industrial Policies, Political Studies 36, 593–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar