Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:22:46.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Policy Punctuations in Mature Welfare States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2009

Carsten Jensen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In mainstream welfare state theory the new institutional approach has explained incremental changes as institutions gradually adjust at the margin. However, big and sudden changes remain outside the scope of this theory. The article uses the theory of punctuated equilibrium to argue that politics is characterized by long periods of stability followed by dramatic bursts of change. The theory is tested on policy data from 18 Western countries, 1971–2002. It confirms that the degree of non-incrementalism depends partly on the institutional friction in a country and partly on the type of welfare programme in question.

Keywords

Incrementalisminstitutional changepunctuated equilibriumwelfare reforms
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , December 2009 , pp. 287 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumgartner, F. R. and Jones, B. D. Jones (1993) Agendas and Instabilities in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R., Breunig, C., Green-Pedersen, C., Jones, B. D., Mortensen, P. B., Neytemans, M. and Walgrave, S. (2008) ‘Punctuated Equilibrium and Institutional Friction in Comparative Perspective’. Paper.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R., Foucault, M. and François, A. (2006) ‘Punctuated equilibrium in French budgeting processes’, Journal of European Public Policy 13 (7): 1086–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breunig, C. (2006) ‘The more things change, the more stay the same: A comparative analysis of budget punctuations’, Journal of European Public Policy 13 (7): 1069–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, D. (2007) ‘Continental drift: On unemployment change in Bismarckian welfare states’, Social Policy & Administration 41 (6): 597–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, K. (2005) ‘Binding hands as a strategy for economic reform: Government by commission’, German Politics 14 (2): 224–247.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1996) ‘Welfare without work: The impasse of labour shredding and familiarism in Continental European social policy’, in Esping-Andersen, G. (ed.) Welfare states in transition. National adaptations in global economies. London: Sage Publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleckenstein, T. (2008) ‘Restructuring Welfare for the Unemployed. The Case of Hartz Legislation in Germany’, Journal of European Social Policy 18 (2): 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green-Pedersen, C. and Haverland, M. (2002) ‘The New Politics and Scholarship of the Welfare State’, Journal of European Social Policy, 12 (1): 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green-Pedersen, C. and Wilkerson, J. (2006) ‘How Agenda-Setting Attributes Shape Politics’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13 (7): 1039–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, J. S. (2004) ‘Privatizing risks without privatizing the welfare state: The hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States’, American Political Science Review 98 (2): 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosking, J. R. M. (1990) ‘L-moments’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 52, 105–124.Google Scholar
Huber, E. and Stephens, J. D. (2001) Development and Crisis of the Welfare State. Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, E., Ragin, C., Stephens, J. D., Brady, D. and Beckfield, J. (2004) Comparative Welfare States Data Set. Northwestern University, University of North Carolina, Duke University and Indiana University.Google Scholar
Jensen, C. (2007) ‘Fixed or Variable Needs? Public Support and Welfare State Reform’, Government and Opposition 42 (2): 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, P. (2006) ‘The policy agendas project: A review’, Journal of European Public Policy 13 (7): 975–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, P. and Margetts, H. (2003) ‘Policy punctuations in the UK’, Public Administration 81: 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, B. D. (1994) Rediscovering decision-making in democratic politics: Attention, choice, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jones, B. D. (2001) Politics and the architecture of choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jones, B. D. and Baumgartner, F. R. (2005) The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jones, B. D., Baumgartner, F. R. and True, J. L. (1998) ‘Policy Punctuations: US Budget Authority, 1947–95’, Journal of Politics 60 (1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, B. D., Baumgartner, F. R., Breunig, C., Wlezien, C., Soroka, S., Foucault, M., François, A., Green-Pedersen, C., Koski, C., John, P., Mortensen, P. B., Robinson, S., Varone, F. and Walgrave, S. (2009) ‘A General Empirical Law of Public Budgets: A Comparative Analysis’, American Journal of Political Science 53 (4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, B. D., Sulkin, T. and Larsen, H. (2003) ‘Policy Punctuations in American Political Institutions’, American Political Science Review 97 (1): 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, W. (1983). The democratic class struggle. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Korpi, W. and Palme, J. (1998) ‘The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality and Poverty in the Western Countries’, American Sociological Review 63 (5): 661–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, W. and Palme, J. (2003). New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: Welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975–1995, American Political Science Review 97 (3): 425–446.Google Scholar
Lessenich, S. (2005) ‘‘Frozen’ landscapes revisited. Path creation in the European Social model’, Social Policy & Society 4 (4): 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, M. C. (2002) ‘The logic of positive feedback: Telecommunication policy through the creation, maintenance, and destruction of a regulated monopoly, in Baumgartner, F. R. and Jones, B. D. (eds.), Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mortensen, P. B. (2005) ‘Policy punctuation in Danish local budgeting’, Public Administration 83 (4): 931–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myles, J. and Pierson, P. (2001) ‘The comparative political economy of pension reform’, in Pierson, P. (ed.) The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Padgett, J. F. (1980) ‘Bounded rationality in budgetary research’, American Political Science Review 74 (2): 354–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B. G., Pierre, J. and King, D. (2005) ‘The politics of path dependency: Political conflict in historical institutionalism’, Journal of Politics 67 (4): 1275–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (1994) Dismantling the Welfare State. Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2000) ‘Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics’, American Political Science Review, 94 (2): 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (2001) ‘Coping with Permanent Austerity: Welfare State Restructuring in Affluent Democracies’, in Pierson, P. (ed.) The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scruggs, L. (2004) Welfare State Entitlements Data Set: A Comparative Institutional Analysis of Eighteen Welfare States, Version 1.1. Available at http://sp.uconn.edu/~scruggs/wp.htmGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1997 [1947]) Administrative behavior. 4th edition. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Starke, P. (2006) ‘The Politics of Welfare State Retrenchment: A Literature Review’, Social Policy and Administration, 40 (1): 104–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, John D (1979). The transition from capitalism to socialism. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. (2005) Beyond continuity. Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (2004) How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walgrave, S. and Varone, F. (2008) ‘Punctuated Equilibrium and Agenda-Setting: Bringing Parties Back in: Policy Change after the Dutroux Crisis in Belgium’, Governance, 21 (3): 365–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar