Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:30:37.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Policy Networks and Industrial Revitalization: High Speed Rail Initiatives in France and Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

James A. Dunn Jr  and
Anthony Perl
James A. Dunn Jr
Affiliation:
Political Science, Rutgers University, Camden
Anthony Perl
Affiliation:
Political Science, University of Calgary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using Atkinson and Coleman's typology of policy networks, this article shows how many of the differences in policy outcomes can be traced to the structure of the policy environment in each nation. French and Germany policy makers adopted a strategy of investing in high speed passenger transport to revitalize their declining railway sectors. The French TGV was developed in a state-directed policy network which insisted on cost containment and commercial viability. In Germany a corporatist style of policymaking in the rail sector led to delays and higher costs for the ICE train. A separate clientele pluralist network led by the Research Ministry developed the Transrapid maglev option, but in order to finance and deploy an operational system, the Chancellor and cabinet had to create a concertation network. The policy network approach provides a useful framework for conducting comparative analysis. In addition, these detailed cases suggest that it is useful to add a dynamic, cross-temporal dimension to the static typology.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , July 1994 , pp. 311 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aberle, G. et al. (1994) Anmerkungen zum Betrieber-und Finanzierungskonzept der Magnetbahn Transrapid. Bonn: Bundesministerium für Verkehr.Google Scholar
Atkinson, M. and Coleman, W. (1989) Strong States and Weak States: Sectoral Policy Networks in Advanced Capitalist Economies. British Journal of Political Science, 19, 1, 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batisse, F. (1994) World Trends in Railway Traffic, Rail International, 1, 13–20.Google Scholar
Bazin, J.-F. (1981) Les défis du TGV: Le nativel age du chemin de fer. Paris: Editions Denöel.Google Scholar
British Railways Board (1963) The Reshaping of British Railways. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Bundesminister für Vekehr (1992) Bundesverkehreswegeplan. Bonn:Google Scholar
Cawson, A., Holmes, P. and Sevens, A. (1987) The Interaction Between Firms and the State in France: The Telecommunications and Consumer Electronics Sectors. In Wright, M. and Wilks, S. (eds.), Comparative Government-Industry Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, W. and Skogstad, G. (1990) Policy Communities and Public Policy in Canada. Toronto: Copp Clark Pitman.Google Scholar
Deregulierungskommission, (1990) Marköffnung und Wettbewerb. Bonn: Bundeswirtschaftsministerium.Google Scholar
Deutsche, Bahn (1994) Die Deutsche Bahn AC öffnet den Fahrweg für Dritte. Frankfürt: DBAG.Google Scholar
Deutsche, Eisenbahn Consulting GmbH (1994) Die Deutsche Bundesregierung beschließt den Bau der TRANSRAPID-Strecke Berlin-Hamburg. Eisenbahntechnische Rundschau, 43, 6, 399–402.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. and Perl, A. (1994) Broadening the Policy Partnership: A New Research Strategy for Bringing High Speed Rail to North America. Paper Presented at the World Congress on Railway Research, Paris.Google Scholar
Ellwanger, G. (1982) TGV-System Paris-Südosten auf deutsche Verhältnisse nicht übertragbar. Die Bundesbahn, 10, 755–758.Google Scholar
Ellwanger, G. and Wilckens, M., (1993) Hochgeschwindigkeitsverkehr gewinnt an Fahrt. Internationales Verkehrsuicsen, 45, 5, 284–90.Google Scholar
Fourniau, M. and Ribeill, G. (1991) La grande vitesse sur rail en France et en R.F.A. In Brenac, E., Finon, D. and Muller, P. (eds.) La grande technologie entre I'État et le marché. Grenoble: CERAT.Google Scholar
Freeman, G. (1985) National Styles and Policy Sectors: Explaining Structural Variation. Journal of Public Policy, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
German Information Service (1993) Railroad Reform Approved; East, West Railways to Merge and Be Privatized. The Week in Germany, 10 December, 5.Google Scholar
German Information Service (1994) Bundesregeirung billigt das ‘Transrapid’-Magnetbahn-Projekt. Deutschland Nachrichten 4 March, 4.Google Scholar
Gohlke steers DB away from the pricipice (1990) Railway Gazette International, 6, 23–24.Google Scholar
Groupe de travail du comité interministériel des enterprises publiques (1967) Rapport sur les enterprises publiques. Paris: Documentation Fran9aise.Google Scholar
Hayward, J. (1991) The Policy Community Approach to Industrial Policy. In Rustow, D. and Erickson, K. (eds.) Comparative Political Dynamics. New York: Harper Collins. 381–407.Google Scholar
Heinisch, R. (1992) High Speed Trains in Germany. Rail International, 23, 23–24.Google Scholar
Henn, W. (1993) ICE Design and Operational Aspects. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 27, 1, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HSB (1971) Studit über ein Schnellverkehrssystem: Systemanalyse und Ergebnisse. Munich: HSB Studiengesellschaft mbH.Google Scholar
Jänsch, E. (1993) High speed Strategy Unfolds. Railway Gazette International, 7, 484.Google Scholar
Jones, J. (1984) The Politics of Transport in Twentieth Century France. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, P. (ed.) (1977) Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Krause, G. (1992) Die Einbindung des Transrapid in das Verkehrskonzept der Bundesregierung. Bulletin, 93, Bonn: Presse-und-Informationsamt der Bundesregierung.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, G. (1992) The Institutional Framework of German Regulation. In Dyson, K. (ed.) The Politics of German Regulation. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
Ludwig, F. (1993) German's railways face a decade of reform. Railway Gazette International, 479–480.Google Scholar
Magnetschnellbahn Berlin-Hamburg GmbH (1993) Konzept für die Finanzierung und den privatwirtschaftlichen Betrieb derMagnetschnellbahn Berlin-Hamburg. Munich.Google Scholar
Miller, L. and Wackers, M. (1993) Transrapid Maglev System: Technical Readiness and Corridors of Application. Journal of Advanced Ground Transportation, 27, 1, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, P. (1992) Entre le local et I'Europe: la crise du modèle francais de politiques publiques. Revue Française de Science Politique, 42, 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orenstein, J. (1990) High Speed Rail Passenger Systems: The Failure of Public Policy in the United States. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Patterson, W. and Southern, D. (1991) Governing Germany. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Ribeill, G. (1982) Le Personnel de la S.N.C.F. (1937–1981). Paris: D.G.R.S.T., Mission de la Recherche au Ministre des Transports.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. (ed.) (1982) Policy Styles in Western Europe. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Ridley, F. (1964) The German Federal Railways - A State-Administered System. Parliamentary Affairs, 17, 2, 182–194.Google Scholar
Rossberg, R. (1991) Industry Shrinks as Demand Dwindles. Railway Gazette International, 5, 309–312.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F.W. (1991) Crisis and Choice in European Social Democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Strohl, M. (1993) Europe's High Speed Trains: A Study in Geo-Economics. Westport, CN: Praeger.Google Scholar
Suleiman, E.N. (1987) Private Power and Centralization: The Notaires and the State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thierry, H. (1992) La gestionde la SNCF: La problematique d'un deficit. In Sorel, J.-M. and Etien, R. (eds.) La SNCF: Histoire, Organisation, Perspectives. Paris: LyCoFac Editions: Université de Paris XIII.Google Scholar
Wilsford, D. (1989) Tactical Advantages Versus Administrative Heterogeneity: The Strengths and Limits of the French State. In Caporaso, J. (ed.) The Elusive State: International and Comparative Perspectives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Wissman, M. (1994) 25 Fragen zum Transrapid. Bonn: Bundesministerium für Verkehr.Google Scholar
Wright, M. (1988) Policy Community, Policy Network and Comparative Industrial Policies, Political Studies, 36, 593–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar