Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T05:38:32.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Policy Analysis-Critical Theory Affair: Wildavsky and Habermas as Bedfellows?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

John Forester
John Forester
Affiliation:
Department of City and Regional Planning, Cornell University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Policy analysis may benefit from specific conceptual contributions derived from Jurgen Habermas's critical social theory. In particular, Aaron Wildavsky's emphasis on the policy analyst's fostering of social and political ‘interactions’ can be given concrete empirical content derived from the critical theorist's account of social and communicative action. In addition, the critical theorist's distinction between action and ‘learning’ extends and sharpens Wildavsky's and Lindblom's account of policy outcomes. Once obstacles to social and political learning are distinguished from ordinary constraints upon citizens' action, policy analysis research (as formulated by Wildavsky and Lindblom) can be more concretely specified and then understood also and essentially to involve fundamental normative judgments of the legitimacy of policy-fostered ‘interactions’.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , May 1982 , pp. 145 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berman, D. (1978) Death on the Job. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. (1976) The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Burton, D. and Murphy, B. (1980) Democratic planning in austerity: practice and theory. In P. Clavel et al., Urban and Regional Planning in an Age of Austerity. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Churchman, C.W. (1979) The Systems Approach and its Enemies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1979) Why more political theory? Telos, 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekema, J. (1981) Incommensurability and judgement, Theory and Society, 10, 521–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, W. (1981) Public Policy Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. (1980) Politics, Values, and Public Policy. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Forester, J. (1980a) Critical theory and planning practice, Journal of the American Planning Association, 07 1980, 275–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forester, J. (1980b) Listening: the social policy of everyday life (critical theory and hermeneutics in practice), Social Praxis, 7(3–4).Google Scholar
Forester, J. (1981a) Selling you the Brooklyn Bridge and ideology (a review of Habermas's Communication and the Evolution of Society), Theory and Society, September 1981.Google Scholar
Forester, J. (1981b) Hannah Arendt and critical theory: a critical response, Journal of Politics, 02.Google Scholar
Forester, J. (1982a) Critical reason and political power in project review activity, Policy and Politics, 10(1).Google Scholar
Forester, J. (1982b) Planning in the face of power, Journal of the American Planning Association, Winter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forester, J. (1982c) Critical theory and organizational analysis. In Morgan, G. (ed.), Research Strategies, forthcoming. Working Papers in Planning 50, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1970) Toward a Rational Society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1973) Theory and Practice. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1975) Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1979) Communication and the Evolution of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Halberstam, D. (1973) The Best and the Brightest. Faucett.Google Scholar
Held, D. (1980) Introduction to Critical Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hirsch, F. (1976) Social Limits to Growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, A. (1979) Communication and reconciliation: Habermas's critique of Adorno, Telos, 39 (Spring).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiss, W. (1976) The Limits of Satisfaction. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. (1977) Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. and Cohen, D. (1979) Usable Knowledge. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lowi, T. (1969) The End of Liberalism. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lukes, S. (1974) Power: A Radical View. London and New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, T. (1978) The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
MacRae, D. (1976) The Social Function of Social Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. (1964) One Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Misgeld, D. (1976) In O‘Neill, J. (ed.), On Critical Theory, New York: Seabury.Google Scholar
O’Connor, J. (1979) The democratic movement in the United States, Kapitalistate.Google Scholar
Pateman, C. (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory. cambridge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rein, M. (1976) Social Science and Public Policy. Harmondsworth, Middlesex and New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Schaar, J. (1969) Legitimacy in the modern state. In P. Green and S. Levinson, Power and Community, New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Schaar, J. (1981) Legitimacy in the Modern State. New York: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1980) Radical Principles. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wellmer, A. (1976) In O'Neill, J. (ed.), On Critical Theory, New York: Seabury.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. (1973) If planning is everything, maybe it's nothing, Policy Sciences.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. (1979) Speaking Truth to Power. Boston: Little, Brown and Co. (Published in Britain as The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis, London: Macmillan 1980).Google Scholar
Wolfe, A. (1977) The Limits of Legitimacy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar