Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:22:26.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Norms, institutions and freedom of speech in the US, the UK and Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2019

Katharine Gelber Open the ORCID record for Katharine Gelber [Opens in a new window]
Katharine Gelber*
Affiliation:
School of Political Science and International Studies, University of Queensland, Australia
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While it has become accepted that norms can act in institution-like ways, a highly valued norm that has not been examined is free speech. Can free speech be conceptualised as acting in institution-like ways? If it can, what does this illuminate about processes of policy change? I analyse policy change between 2001 and 2011 in the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia, a period during which significant new limits were introduced on free speech in relation to national security. In addition to showing how free speech acted in institution-like ways, the analysis suggests three implications: norms can both act in institution-like ways and be subject to change in interaction with other institutions; a broad, cultural level institution can mask policy change at the narrow, rule-based level even where the latter contradicts the former; and complexity and variation in speech regulation can be understood as consequences of the to-be-expected variability in the institutionalisation of a norm.

Keywords

freedom of speechinstitutionsnew institutionalismsnorms
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , June 2021 , pp. 209 - 227
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amnesty International (2005) United Kingdom: Amnesty International’s Briefing on the Draft Terrorism Bill 2005, www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/84000/eur450382005en.pdf (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Article 19 (2005) Statement on Clause 1 of the Draft Terrorism Bill of the United Kingdom, https://www.article19.org/data/files/pdfs/analysis/uk.gt.05.pdf (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Ashcroft, J (2001a) Media Conference with FBI Director, http://www.justice.gov/archive/ag/speeches/2001/agcrisisremarks10_4.htm (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Ashcroft, J (2001b) Remarks on Reorganization of Department of Justice, http://www.justice.gov/archive/ag/speeches/2001/agcrisisremarks11_08.htm (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Ashcroft, J (2002) Press Conference on an Indictment in the Daniel Pearl Case, http://www.justice.gov/archive/ag/speeches/2002/031402newsconfernceindictmentindanielpearlcase.htm (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Ashcroft, J (2003a) Prepared Remarks to Council on Foreign Relations, http://www.justice.gov/archive/ag/speeches/2003/021003agcouncilonforeignrelation.htm (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Ashcroft, J (2003b) Press Conference, http://www.justice.gov/archive/ag/speeches/2003/02202003pressconference.htm (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Barendt, E (2007) Freedom of Speech, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, S (2011) Do We Really Need a New ‘Constructivist Institutionalism’ to Explain Institutional Change? British Journal of Political Science, 41(4): 883–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, S (2012) The Power of Ideas: The Ideational Shaping of the Structural Power of Business. International Studies Quarterly, 56: 661–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, S and Feng, H (2014) How Proximate and ‘Meta-institutional’ Contexts Shape Institutional Change: Explaining the Rise of the People’s Bank of China. Political Studies, 62: 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, T (2001a) Leader’s Speech, Brighton, http://www.britishpoliticalspeech.org/speech-archive.htm?speech=186 (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Blair, T (2001b) Speech to Parliament, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20061004051823/http://number10.gov.uk/page1598 (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Blair, T (2002a) Speech at the Lord Mayor’s Banquet, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20061004051823/http://number10.gov.uk/page1731 (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Blair, T (2003) Doorstop Interview, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20061004051823/http://number10.gov.uk/page4814 (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Blair, T (2004) Monthly Press Conference, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20061004051823/http://number10.gov.uk/page5860 (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Blair, T (2005a) Monthly Press Conference, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20061004051823/http://number10.gov.uk/page8041 (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Blair, T (2005b) Monthly Press Conference, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20061004051823/http://number10.gov.uk/page8294 (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Bleich, E (2011) The Freedom to be Racist: How the United States and Europe Struggle to Preserve Freedom and Combat Racism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blunkett, D (2003) Security and Justice: Mutuality and Individual Rights, Lecture at John Jay College, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20080727123940/http://press.homeoffice.gov.uk/Speeches/speeches-archive/sp-hs-security-justice-0403?view=Binary (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Blunkett, D (2004) Speech at Harvard University: Defending the Democratic State and Maintaining Liberty – Two Sides of the Same Coin? http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20080727123940/http://press.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/defending.pdf?view=Binary (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Brandis, G (2014) Television Interview. Sky News, http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/21248/20150925-1049/www.attorneygeneral.gov.au/transcripts/Pages/2014/ThirdQuarter2014/21September2014-TelevisionInterviewAustralianAgendaSkyNews.html (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Breuning, M (2011) Content Analysis. In Ishiyama, J and Breuning, M. (eds.), 21st Century Political Science: A Reference Handbook, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 490–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brill, S (2003) After: The Rebuilding and Defending of America in the September 12 Era. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Brown, G (2007) Speech: On Liberty, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7062237.stm (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Brown, G (2008) National Security Strategy Statement to the House, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20061004051823/http://number10.gov.uk/page15102 (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Bush, GW (2001a) Remarks, http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/WCPD-2001-09-17/pdf/WCPD-2001-09-17-Pg1301-2.pdf (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Bush, GW (2001b) Remarks Announcing Most Wanted Terrorists List, http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/WCPD-2001-10-15/pdf/WCPD-2001-10-15-Pg1448.pdf (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Bush, GW (2001c) Radio Address, http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/WCPD-2001-10-08/pdf/WCPD-2001-10-08-Pg1397.pdf (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Bush, GW (2002a) State of the Union Speech, http://presidentialrhetoric.com/speeches/01.29.02.html (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Bush, GW (2002b) Remarks to the Community in Kentucky, http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/WCPD-2002-09-09/pdf/WCPD-2002-09-09-Pg1489.pdf (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Bush, GW (2002c) Address to the Nation on Homeland Security, http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/WCPD-2002-06-10/pdf/WCPD-2002-06-10-Pg963-2.pdf (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Bush, GW (2002d) Remarks at Town Hall Meeting in Ontario, California, http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/WCPD-2002-01-14/pdf/WCPD-2002-01-14-Pg11.pdf (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Bush, GW (2003a) Remarks on Improving Counterterrorism Intelligence, http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/WCPD-2003-02-17/pdf/WCPD-2003-02-17-Pg204-3.pdf (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Bush, GW (2005) Radio Address, http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/WCPD-2005-03-28/pdf/WCPD-2005-03-28-Pg483.pdf (accessed 10 June, 2019)Google Scholar
Chilton, P and Schäffner, C (2011) Discourse and Politics. In van Dijk, T. (ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Volume 2, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 303–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, A, Emerton, P, Kadous, W, Petitt, A, Sempill, S, Sentas, V, Stratton, J and Tham, JC (2005) Laws for Insecurity? A Report on the Federal Government’s Proposed Counter-Terrorism Measures. Sydney: Australian Muslim Civil Rights Advocacy Network.Google Scholar
Clarke, C (2005) Speech to the Heritage Foundation: ‘Contesting the Threat of Terrorism’, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20080727123940/http://press.homeoffice.gov.uk/Speeches/speeches-archive/10-05-heritage-foundation (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Cohn, B (2012) 21 Charts That Explain American Values Today, The Atlantic, https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/06/21-charts-that-explain-american-values-today/258990/ (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Cole, D (2003a) Enemy Aliens: Double Standards and Constitutional Freedoms in the War on Terrorism. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Cole, D (2003b) The New McCarthyism: Repeating History in the War on Terrorism, Harvard Civil Rights: Civil Liberties Law Review, 38: 8–15.Google Scholar
Cole, D (2005) Criminalizing Speech: The Material Support Provision. In Baker, S and Kavanagh, J. (eds.), Patriot Debates: Experts Debate the USA Patriot Act. Chicago: American Bar Association, 144–149.Google Scholar
Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (2008) Australia 2020 Summit: Final Report. Canberra: DPMC.Google Scholar
De Rosa, M (2005) Summary. In Baker, S. and Kavanagh, J. (eds.), Patriot Debates: Experts Debate the USA Patriot Act. Chicago: American Bar Association, 143–144.Google Scholar
Flynn, EJ (2007) The Security Council’s Counter-Terrorism Committee and Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review 7(2): 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gearty, C (2013) Liberty and Security. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gelber, K (2009) The False Analogy between Vilification and Sedition. Melbourne University Law Review, 33(1): 270–291.Google Scholar
Gelber, K (2011) Speech Matters: Getting Free Speech Right. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Gelber, K (2016) Free Speech After 9/11. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzales, A (2005) Prepared Remarks to Hoover Institution, http://www.justice.gov/archive/ag/speeches/2005/02282005_agremarkshov.htm (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Goodin, R (1996) Institutions and Their Design. In Goodin, R. (ed.), The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P (1986) Governing the Economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P and Taylor, R (1996) Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5): 936–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, C (2009) Constructivist Institutionalism. In Binder, S., Rhodes, R. and Rockman, B. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 56–73.Google Scholar
Howard, J (2001a) Address to Australian Defence Association, http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/21248/20150925-1049/www.attorneygeneral.gov.au/transcripts/Pages/2014/ThirdQuarter2014/21September2014-TelevisionInterviewAustralianAgendaSkyNews.html (accessed 10 June, 2019)Google Scholar
Howard, J (2001b) Address to National Press Club, http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/10052/20020221-0000/www.pm.gov.au/news/speeches/2001/speech1324.htm (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Howard, J (2002a) Address to Committee for the Economic Development of Australia, http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/10052/20030221-000/www.pm.gov.au/news/speeches/main02.htm (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Howard, J (2002b) Questions and Answers Following the Prime Minister’s National Press Club Address, http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/10052/20021121-0000/www.pm.gov.au/news/speeches/2002/speech1850.htm (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Howard, J (2002c) Address to NSW Liberal Party State Council, http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/10052/20030221-0000/www.pm.gov.au/news/speeches/2002/speech2001.htm (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Howard, J (2004) Address to Australian Strategic Policy Institute, http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/10052/20051121-0000/www.pm.gov.au/news/speeches/speech921.html (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Howard, J (2005) Address to Liberal Party of Australia (WA Division) , http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/10052/20051121-0000/www.pm.gov.au/news/speeches/speech1600.html (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Hudson, P (2002) PM Defends Right to Burn Flag. The Age, http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/11/15/1037080914583.html (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch (2005) Submission on the Draft Terrorism Bill, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt200506/jtselect/jtrights/75/75we15.htm (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Joint Committee on Human Rights (2006) Counter-Terrorism Policy and Human Rights: Terrorism Bill and Related Matters. Third Report of Session 2005-06. London: JCHR.Google Scholar
Joint Committee on Human Rights (2012) Legislative Scrutiny: Protection of Freedoms Bill. Eighteenth Report of Session 2010-2012. London: JCHR.Google Scholar
Krook, M L and True, J(2010) Rethinking the Life Cycles of International Norms: The United Nations and the Global Promotion of Gender Equality. European Journal of International Relations, 18(1): 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardo, M, Buwalda, A and Lyman, PB (2006) Terrorism, Material Support, the Inherent Right to Self-Defense, and the U.S. Obligation to Protect Legitimate Asylum Seekers in a Post 9.11, Post-Patriot Act, Post-Real ID Act World. Regent Journal of International Law, 4: 237–261.Google Scholar
Lowndes, V and Roberts, M(2013) Why Institutions Matter: The New Institutionalism in Political Science. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, F, Kenny, M and Chappell, L (2010) New Institutionalism through a Gender Lens: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism? International Political Science Review, 31(5): 573–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J and Olsen, J (1984) The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review, 78: 734–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J and Olsen, J (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
March, J and Olsen, J (2008) Elaborating the ‘New Institutionalism’. In Binder, S., Rhodes, R. and Rockman, B. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marr, D (2007) His Master’s Voice: The Corruption of Public Debate under Howard. Quarterly Essay, 26.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, E (2012) Terror, Reason and Rights. In Reed, E. and Dumper, M. (eds.), Civil Liberties, National Security and Prospects for Consensus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 152–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukasey, M (2008) Prepared Remarks to Boston College Law School Commencement Ceremony, http://www.justice.gov/archive/ag/speeches/2008/ag-speech-0805236.html (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M (2008) Liberty of Conscience. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Post, R (2011) Participatory Democracy and Free Speech. Virginia Law Review, 97(3): 477–489.Google Scholar
Powell, W and Di Maggio, P. Eds. (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roach, K (2011) The 9/11 Effect: Comparative Counter-Terrorism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, M (2012) Hate Speech in Constitutional Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis. In Herz, M. and Molnar, P. (eds.), The Content and Context of Hate Speech. New York: Cambridge University Press, 242–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruddock, P (2004) Statement to House on National Security – Overseas Developments, http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/21248/20040722-0000/www.ag.gov.au/www/MinisterRuddockHome.nsf/Web+Pages/5B8D376BE792B92CCA256E3F001D407E02ec.html?OpenDocument (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Saunders, K (2017) Free Expression and Democracy: A Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, F (2005) The Exceptional First Amendment. In Ignatieff, M. (ed.), American Exceptionalism and Human Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 29–56.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V (2010) Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth ‘New Institutionalism’. European Political Science Review, 2(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee (2005) Inquiry into the Provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Bill (No. 2) 2005. Canberra: Parliament of Australia.Google Scholar
Steinmo, S (2008) Historical Institutionalism. In Della Porta, D. and Keating, M. (eds.), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 118–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, W and Thelen, K (2005) Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. In Streeck, W and Thelen, K. (eds.), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–39.Google Scholar
Thelen, K (1999) Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2: 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T (1997) The Study of Discourse. In van Dijk, T. (ed.), Discourse as Structure and Process: Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1–34.Google Scholar
Walker, C (2006) Clamping Down on Terrorism in the United Kingdom. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 4: 1137–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, C (2011) Terrorism and the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weinstein, J (1999) Hate Speech, Pornography, and the Radical Attack on Freedom of Speech Doctrine. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Weinstein, J (2011) Participatory Democracy as the Central Value of American Free Speech Doctrine. Virginia Law Review, 97(3): 491–514.Google Scholar
Williams, D (2002a) Opening Address: Globalising Terror, Political Violence in the New Millenium, http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/21248/20030501-0000/www.ag.gov.au/www/attorneygeneralHome.nsf/Web+Pages/2C49751F18D4225FCA256BB30007EF3E02ec.html?OpenDocument (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Williams, D (2002b) Speech to National Counter-Terrorism Committee Dinner, http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/21248/20030501-0000/www.ag.gov.au/www/attorneygeneralHome.nsf/Web+Pages/5AC76D542E1D6517CA256C720002C3DD02ec.html?OpenDocument (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar
Williams, D (2002c) House Message: ASIO Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Bill, http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/21248/20030501-0000/www.ag.gov.au/www/attorneygeneralHome.nsf/Web+Pages/41A0B86D7B465370CA256C8D007E16CB02ec.html?OpenDocument (accessed 10 June, 2019).Google Scholar