Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:29:21.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multilateral institutions, accession conditionality and rule transfer in the European Union: the Energy Community in South East Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2012

Stephen Padgett
Stephen Padgett*
Affiliation:
School of Government and Public Policy, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland
*
Stephen Padgett School of Government and Public Policy University of Strathclyde McCance Building 16 Richmond Street Glasgow G1 1XQ Tel.: 0141 357 3671 Fax: 0141 552 5677 Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Conditionality is widely used by international organisations to induce “client states” to engage in structural reform. In the European Union (EU) it plays an important role in ensuring that accession countries adopt EU rules as a condition of membership. Reliance on external incentives, however, limits the effectiveness of bilateral accession conditionality, especially for pre-accession countries with uncertain membership prospects. This article argues that multilateral institutions can boost the rule transfer effects of bilateral accession conditionality by reinforcing its incentive structure. The contention is tested by empirical research into the Energy Community in South East Europe. The research uses cross-national and cross-sectoral comparison to evaluate the rule transfer effects of Community institutions relative to accession conditionality and the terms of energy interdependence. It finds that whilst accession status is the main predictor of alignment with the energy acquis, there is evidence that multilateral institutions of the Energy Community exert a significant reinforcement effect.

Keywords

energyEnergy CommunityEuropean Unionmultilateral institutionsrule transfer
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , December 2012 , pp. 261 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anastasakis, O.Bechev, D. (2003) EU Conditionality in South East Europe: Bringing Commitment to the Process. Working Paper, South Eastern Studies Programme, European Studies Centre. Oxford: St Anthony's College.Google Scholar
Bechev, D. (2006) Carrots, sticks and norms: the EU and regional cooperation in Southeast Europe. Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans 8: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correljé, A.van der Linde, C. (2006) Energy supply security and geo-politics. A European perspective. Energy Policy 34(5): 532–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrakopoulos, D. (2001) Unintended consequences: institutional autonomy and executive discretion in the European Union. Journal of Public Policy 21(2): 107–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economic Consulting Associates (2009) South East Europe Gasification Study; Final Report. Accessed at www.energy-community.org/pls/portal/docs/254188Google Scholar
Epstein, R. A.Sedelmeier, U. (2008) Beyond conditionality: international institutions in postcommunist Europe after enlargement. Journal of European Public Policy 15(6): 795–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission (1999) Regular Report from the Commission on Bulgaria's Progress towards Accession. Brussels 13. 10. 99. Accessed at http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/1999/bulgaria_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2006) Monitoring report on the state of preparedness for EU membership of Bulgaria and Romania. COM (2006) 549 final.Google Scholar
European Commission (2007) Croatia 2007 Progress Report, SEC (2007) 1431.Google Scholar
European Commission (2009) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2009-10. COM (2009) 533 final.Google Scholar
European Commission (2010a) Croatia 2010 Progress Report, SEC (2010) 1326.Google Scholar
European Commission (2010b) Commission Staff Working Document; Serbia Progress Report, SEC (2010) 1330.Google Scholar
European Commission (2010c) Commission Staff Working Document: Analytical Report accompanying the Commission Opinion on Albania's application for membership of the European Union. SEC (2010) 1335.Google Scholar
European Commission (2011a) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council under Article 7 of Decision 2006/500/EC (Energy Community Treaty) COM(2011) 105 final, Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission (2011b) Commission Staff Working Document; Analytical Report accompanying the Commission Opinion on Serbia's application for membership of the European Union. SEC (2011) 1208.Google Scholar
European Commission (2011c) Commission Staff Working Paper: Republic of Macedonia Progress Report, SEC (2011) 1203.Google Scholar
European Commission (2011d) Commission Staff Working Paper: Montenegro Progress Report, SEC (2011) 1204.Google Scholar
Giamouridis, A.Paleoyannis, S. (2011) Security of gas supply in South Eastern Europe: potential contribution of planned pipelines, NLG, and storage. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabbe, H. (2001) How does Europeanization affect CEE governance? Conditionality, diffusion and diversity. Journal of European Public Policy 8(6): 1013–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helms, D. (2007) The New Energy Paradigm. In Hems, D. (ed.), The New Energy Paradigm, 9–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joerges, C.Neyer, J. (1997) Transforming strategic interaction into deliberative problem-solving: European comitology in the foodstuff sector. Journal of European Public Policy 4(4): 609–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, R. O.Nye, J. S. (1987) Power and interdependence revisited. International Organization 41(4): 725–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerremans, B. (1996) Do institutions make a difference? Non-institutionalism, neo-institutionalism and the logic of decision-making in the European Union. Governance 9(2): 217–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavenex, S. (2008) A governance perspective on the European neighbourhood policy: integration beyond conditionality? Journal of European Public Policy 15(6): 938–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavenex, S., Lehmkuhl, D.Wichmann, N. (2009) Modes of external governance: a cross-national and cross-sectoral comparison. Journal of European Public Policy 16(6): 813–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavenex, S.Schimmelfennig, F. (2009) EU rules beyond EU borders: external governance in European politics. Journal of European Public Policy 16(6): 791–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. (2003) Informal integration and the supranational construction of the Council. Journal of European Public Policy 10(6): 996–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Official Journal (2005): Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Croatia. Official Journal of the European Union L026, Volume 48, 28 January.Google Scholar
Pollack, M. (1996): The new institutionalism and EC governance: the promise and limits of institutional analysis. Governance 9(4): 429–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pöyry Management Consulting/Nord Pool Consulting (2010) South East Europe Wholesale Market Opening. Accessed at www.energy-community.org/pls/portal/docs/594181.PDFGoogle Scholar
Renner, S. (2009) The Energy Community of Southeast Europe: a neofunctionalist project of regional integration. European Integration Online Papers 13.Google Scholar
Renner, S.Trauner, F. (2009) Creeping EU membership in South-East Europe: the dynamics of EU rule transfer to the Western Balkans. Journal of European Integration 31(4): 449–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F.Sedelmeier, U. (2004) Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 11(4): 661–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F. (2005) The International Promotion of Political Norms in Eastern Europe: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis, Central and Eastern Europe. Working Paper Number 61. Cambridge MASS: University of Harvard.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F. (2008) EU political accession conditionality after the 2004 enlargement: consistency and effectiveness. Journal of European Public Policy 15(6): 918–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, A. -M.Hale, T. N. (2010) Transgovernmental networks and multi-level governance. In Enderkein H. Wälti S. and Zinn M, (eds), Handbook on Multilevel Governance, 358–369. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Tallberg, J. (2002) Delegation to supranational institutions: why, how, and with what consequences? West European Politics 25(1): 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vachudova, M. A. (2005) Europe undivided: democracy, leverage and integration after Communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar