Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:00:06.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of intra-EU migration on welfare chauvinism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2017

Cornelius Cappelen  and
Yvette Peters
Cornelius Cappelen
Affiliation:
Department of Comparative Politics, University of Bergen, Norway E-mail: [email protected]
Yvette Peters
Affiliation:
Department of Comparative Politics, University of Bergen, Norway E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine whether intra-EU migration affects welfare chauvinistic attitudes, i.e. the idea that immigrants’ access to the welfare system should be restricted. According to the in-group/out-group theory, migration can unleash feelings of insecurity and thus trigger welfare chauvinism. According to intergroup contact theory, welfare chauvinism should decrease when immigration is higher, because contact reduces prejudice and softens anti-immigrant stances. We test these theories using data from the European Social Survey 2008/2009, supplemented with country-level data, and analyse these data using a multilevel ordered logit approach. We find a negative relation between intra-EU immigration and welfare chauvinism, supporting the intergroup contact theory: in countries with more intra-EU migration, welfare chauvinism tends to be lower. Furthermore, the higher the percentage of East European immigrants compared to other EU immigrants, the higher the level of welfare chauvinism.

Keywords

Bismarckian and Beveridgean welfare systemEuropeintergroup contact theoryintra-EU immigrationwelfare chauvinism
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 389 - 417
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alfano, M., Dustmann, C. and Frattini, T. (2016) Immigration and the UK: Reflections After Brexit. In Fasani F. (ed.) Refugees and Economic Migrants: Facts, Policies and Challenges. London: CEPR Press, 55–81.Google Scholar
Alesina, A. and Glaeser, E. L. (2004) Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 129.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.Google Scholar
Andersen, J. G. and Bjørklund, T. (1990) Structural Changes and New Cleavages: The Progress Parties in Denmark and Norway. Acta Sociologica 33(3): 195–217.Google Scholar
Aronson, E. and Patnoe, S. (1997) The Jigsaw Classroom, 2nd ed. New York: Longman, 150 pp.Google Scholar
Banting, K. G. (2010) Is There a Progressive’s Dilemma in Canada? Immigration, Multiculturalism and the Welfare State. Canadian Journal of Political Science 43(4): 797–820.Google Scholar
Banting, K., Soroka, S. and Koning, E. (2013) Multicultural Diversity and Redistribution. In Banting K. and Myles J. (eds), Inequality and the Fading of Redistributive Politics 165–186. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Brambor, T., Clark, W. R. and Golder, M. (2006) Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses. Political Analysis 14: 63–82.Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. (1997) Classifying Welfare States: A Two-Dimension Approach. Journal of Social Policy 26(3): 351–372.Google Scholar
Cappelen, C. (2016) Intra-EU Migration and the Moral Sustainability of the Welfare State. In Peters Y. and Tatham M. (eds.), Democratic Transformations in Europe 31 – Challenges and Opportunities. Abingdon: Routledge, 43–63.Google Scholar
Cappelen, C. and Midtbø, T. (2016) Intra-EU Labour Migration and Support for the Norwegian Welfare State. European Sociological Review 32(6): 691–703.Google Scholar
Cappelen, C. and Peters, Y. ( Forthcoming) Diversity and Welfare State Legitimacy in Europe. The Challenge of Intra-EU Migration. Journal of European Public Policy (https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1314534).Google Scholar
CESifo (2008) Bismarck Versus Beveridge: Social Insurance Systems in Europe. Munich: IFO Institute for Economic Research.Google Scholar
Coenders, M. and Scheepers, P. (2003) The Effect of Education on Nationalism and Ethnic Exclusionism: An International Comparison. Political Psychology 24(2): 313–343.Google Scholar
Crepaz, M. M. and Damron, R. (2008) Constructing Tolerance: How the Welfare State Shapes Attitudes About Immigrants. Comparative Political Studies 42: 437–463.Google Scholar
Dustmann, C. and Frattini, T. (2014) The Fiscal Effects of Immigration to the UK. The Economic Journal 124(580): F593–F643.Google Scholar
Eger, M. A. (2009) Even in Sweden: The Effect of Immigration on Support for Welfare State Spending. European Sociological Review 26: 203–217.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Finseraas, H. (2008) Immigration and Preferences for Redistribution: An Empirical Analysis of European Survey Data. Comparative European Politics 6(4): 407–431.Google Scholar
Ford, R. (2006) Prejudice and White Majority Welfare Attitudes in the UK. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 16(2): 141–156.Google Scholar
Freeman, G. P. (1986) Migration and the Political Economy of the Welfare State. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 485: 51–63.Google Scholar
Freeman, G. P. (2009) Immigration, Diversity, and Welfare Chauvinism. The Forum 7(3): 7.Google Scholar
Gijsberts, M., Scheepers, P. and Coenders, M. (2004) Exclusion of Legal Migrants in Western Europe. In Gijsberts M. , Hagendoorn L. and Scheepers P. (eds.), Nationalism and Exclusion of Migrants: Cross-National Comparisons. Aldershot: Ashgate, 121–142.Google Scholar
Gilens, M. (1995) Racial Attitudes and Opposition to Welfare. The Journal of Politics 57(4): 994–1014.Google Scholar
Gorodzeisky, A. and Semyonov, M. (2009) Terms of Exclusion: Public Views Towards Admission and Allocation of Rights to Immigrants in European Countries. Ethnic and Racial Studies 32(3): 401–423.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, J. and Hopkins, D. J. (2014) Public Attitudes Toward Immigration. Annual Review of Political Science 17: 225–249.Google Scholar
Hewstone, M., Rubin, M. and Willis, H. (2002) Intergroup Bias. In Crisp R. J. (ed.), Social Psychology. vol. 3 New York, NY: Routledge, 323–344.Google Scholar
Hopkins, D. J. (2010) Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition. American Political Science Review 104(1): 40–60.Google Scholar
Johns, M. (2014) The New Minorities of Europe: Social Cohesion in the European Union. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Johnston, R., Banting, K., Kymlicka, W. and Soroka, S. (2010) National Identity and Support for the Welfare State. Canadian Journal of Political Science 43(2): 349–377.Google Scholar
Koning, E. (2011) The Real and Perceived Economics of Immigration: Welfare Chauvinism and Immigrants’ Use of Government Transfers in Twelve Countries. Canadian Political Science Association Conference, 16–18 May, Waterloo.Google Scholar
Kunovich, R. M. (2004) Social Structural Position and Prejudice: An Exploration of Cross-National Differences in Regression Slopes. Social Science Research 33(1): 20–44.Google Scholar
Kvist, J. (2004) Does EU Enlargement Start a Race to the Bottom? Strategic Interaction Among EU Member States in Social Policy. Journal of European Social Policy 14(3): 301–318.Google Scholar
Larsen, C. A. (2011) Ethnic Heterogeneity and Public Support for Welfare: Is the American Experience Replicated in Britain, Sweden and Denmark? Scandinavian Political Studies 34(4): 332–353.Google Scholar
Luttmer, E. F. (2001) Group Loyalty and the Taste for Redistribution. Journal of political Economy 109(3): 500–528.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H. (1950) Citizenship and Social Class: And Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mau, S. and Burkhardt, C. (2009) Migration and Welfare State Solidarity in Western Europe. Journal of European Social Policy 19(3): 213–229.Google Scholar
Mewes, J. and Mau, S. (2012) Welfare Chauvinism, Class, and Economic Uncertainty. In Svallfors S. (ed.), Contested Welfare States. Welfare Attitudes in Europe and Beyond. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, Pp. 119–157.Google Scholar
Mewes, J. and Mau, S. (2013) Globalization, Socio-Economic Status and Welfare Chauvinism: European Perspectives on Attitudes Toward the Exclusion of Immigrants. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 54(3): 228–245.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F. (1998) Intergroup Contact Theory. Annual Review of Psychology 49(1): 65–85.Google Scholar
Reeskens, T. and Van Oorschot, W. (2012) Disentangling the “New Liberal Dilemma”: On the Relation Between General Welfare Redistribution Preferences and Welfare Chauvinism. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 53(2): 120–139.Google Scholar
Riordan, C. (1978) Equal-Status Interracial Contact: A Review and Revision of the Concept. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 2(2): 161–185.Google Scholar
Scheepers, P., Gijsberts, M. and Coenders, M. (2002) Ethnic Exclusionism in European Countries: Public Opposition to Civil Rights for Legal Migrants as a Response to Perceived Ethnic Threat. European Sociological Review 18(1): 17–34.Google Scholar
Schlueter, E. and Wagner, U. (2008) Regional Differences Matter Examining the Dual Influence of the Regional Size of the Immigrant Population on Derogation of Immigrants in Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 49(2–3): 153–173.Google Scholar
Semyonov, M., Raijman, R. and Gorodzeisky, A. (2006) The Rise of Anti-Foreigner Sentiment in European Societies, 1988-2000. American Sociological Review 71(3): 426–449.Google Scholar
Shayo, M. (2009) A Model of Social Identity With an Application to Political Economy: Nation, Class, and Redistribution. American Political Science Review 103(2): 147–174.Google Scholar
Senik, C., Stichnoth, H. and Van der Straeten, K. (2009) Immigration and Natives’ Attitudes Towards the Welfare State: Evidence From the European Social Survey. Social Indicators Research 91(3): 345–370.Google Scholar
Sniderman, P. M., Hagendoorn, L. and Prior, M. (2004) Predisposing Factors and Situational Triggers: Exclusionary Reactions to Immigrant Minorities. American Political Science Review 98(1): 35–49.Google Scholar
Soroka, S., Johnston, R. and Banting, K. (2007) Ethnicity, Trust and the Welfare State. In Kay F. and Johnston R. (eds.), Social Capital, Diversity and the Welfare State. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 279–303.Google Scholar
Stein, R. M., Post, S. S. and Rinden, A. L. (2000) Reconciling Context and Contact Effects on Racial Attitudes. Political Research Quarterly 53(2): 285–303.Google Scholar
Stichnoth, H. (2012) Does Immigration Weaken Natives’ Support for the Unemployed? Evidence from Germany. Public Choice 151(3–4): 631–654.Google Scholar
Van der Waal, J., Achterberg, P., Houtman, D., De Koster, W. and Manevska, K. (2010) ‘Some are More Equal Than Others’: Economic Egalitarianism and Welfare Chauvinism in the Netherlands. Journal of European Social Policy 20(4): 350–363.Google Scholar
Van Der Waal, J., De Koster, W. and Van Oorschot, W. (2013) Three Worlds of Welfare Chauvinism? How Welfare Regimes Affect Support for Distributing Welfare to Immigrants in Europe. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 15(2): 164–181.Google Scholar
Van Oorschot, W. (2000) Who Should Get What, and Why? On Deservingness Criteria and the Conditionality of Solidarity Among the Public. Policy & Politics 28(1): 33–48.Google Scholar
Van Oorschot, W. (2006) Making the Difference in Social Europe: Deservingness Perceptions Among Citizens of European Welfare States. Journal of European Social Policy 16(1): 23–42.Google Scholar
Wagner, U., Christ, O., Pettigrew, T. F., Stellmacher, J. and Wolf, C. (2006) Prejudice and Minority Proportion: Contact Instead of Threat Effects. Social Psychology Quarterly 69(4): 370–380.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Cappelen and Peters supplementary material 1

Cappelen and Peters supplementary material

Download Cappelen and Peters supplementary material 1(File)
File 43.7 KB