Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:06:07.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explaining Foreign Economic Policy: A Comparison of U.S and West German Export Controls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Claus Hofhansel
Claus Hofhansel
Affiliation:
Political Science, The College of Wooster
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyzes differences between United States and West German export controls. It shows that United States controls are more extensive and stricter than controls in West Germany. Three possible explanations for this variation in policy are considered. First, these two states differ in regard to their positions in the international system and in their choice of economic strategies. Second, the extent of domestic political support for strict export control policies varies between the two countries. Finally, West Germany lacks the institutional framework to adequately control its foreign trade. The evidence presented corroborates the first two alternatives, while institutional explanations receive relatively little support. The article then discusses the historical development of United States and West German export control policies and institutions. The analysis shows evidence of both change and stability. More specifically, the article questions the argument that institutions in foreign economic policy, once established, persist and resist change, instead of adapting to environmental changes. Several hypotheses are considered to explain why in the area of export controls changes in policy, and to some extent institutions, occurred more frequently in West Germany than in the United States.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , July 1990 , pp. 299 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abelshauser, W. (1984) The First Post-Liberal Nation: Stages in the Development of Modern Corporatism in Germany, European History Quarterly, 14, 3, 285–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aberbach, J., Putnam, R. and Rockman, B. (1981) Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Karlsson, G. (1968) Western Economic Warfare 1947–1967: A Case Study in Foreign Economic Policy. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
atomwirtschaft (1981) Der AuBenhandel der BR Deutschland mit kerntechnischen Erzeugnissen 1978–1980, November.Google Scholar
atomwirtschaft (1984) Der AuBenhandel der BR Deutschland mit kerntechnischen Erzeugnissen 1981–1983, November.Google Scholar
Beckman, R. (1985) Nuclear Non-Proliferation: Congress and the Control of Peaceful Nuclear Activities. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Berman, H. and Garson, J. (1967) United States Export Controls - Past, Present and Future, Columbia Law Review, 67, 5, 791–890.Google Scholar
Bertsch, G. K. (1981) U.S. Export Controls: the 1970's and Beyond, Journal of World Trade Law, 15, 1, 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettauer, R. (1978) The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act of 1978, Law and Policy in International Business, 10,4, 1105–80.Google Scholar
Brzoska, M. (1981) Bundesdeutsche Riistungsexporte in die Dritte Welt: Daten - Verfahren - Zusammenhange. In Moltmann, B. (ed.), Militarismus und Rüstung: Beiträge zur ökumenischen Diskussion. Heidelberg: Forschungsstatte der evangelischen Studiengemeinschaft.Google Scholar
Clarizio, L. and Woolcock, S. (1985) Die inneramerikanische Debatte liber politische Export-beschränkungen, Europa-Archiv, 40, 4, 99–110.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report (1986a), 24 May.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report (1986b), 7 June.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report (1990a), 28 April.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report (1990b), 9 June.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report (1990c), 21 July.Google Scholar
Crawford, B. (1988) Western Control of East-West Trade Finance: The Role of U.S. Power and International Regimes. In Bertsch, G. K. (ed.), Controlling East-West Trade and Technology Transfer: Power, Politics and Policies. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Erhard, L. (1953) Deutschlands Rückkehr zum Weltmarkt. Dusseldorf: Econ-Verlag.Google Scholar
Finan, W. (1987) Esitmate of Direct Economic Costs Associated with U.S National Security Controls. In National Academy of Sciences, Balancing the National Interest: U.S. National Security Export Controls and Global Economic Competition. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Fong, G. R. (1990) State Strength, Industry Structure and Industrial Policy: American and Japanese Experiences in Microelectronics, Comparative Politics, 22, 3, 273–99.Google Scholar
Frost, E. and Stent, A. (1983) NATO's Troubles with East-West Trade, International Security, 8, 1, 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldmann, K. (1988) Change and Stability in Foreign Policy: The Problems and Possibilities of Détente. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourevitch, P. (1986) Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Haftendorn, H. (1871) Militärhilfe und Rüstungsexporte der BRD. Düsseldorf: Bertelsmann Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Hammond, P. Y., Louscher, D., Salomone, M. and Graham, N. (1983) The Reluctant Supplier: U.S. Decisionmaking for Arms Sales. Cambridge: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.Google Scholar
Hanrieder, W. F. (1989) Germany, America, Europe: Forty Years of German Foreign Policy. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausknecht, J. (1975) Das Bundesamt für gewerbliche Wirtschaft: Geschichte - Aufgaben Organisation. Eschborn: Bundesamt fur gewerbliche Wirtschaft.Google Scholar
Husbands, J. (1979) How the United States Makes Foreign Military Sales. In Neuman, S. and Harkavy, R. (eds.), Arms Transfers in the Modern World. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G.J. (1986) The State and Strategies of International Adjustment, World Politics, 39, 1, 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G.J. (1988) Conclusion: An Institutional Approach to American Foreign Economic Policy, International Organization, 42, 1, 219–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. J., Lake, D. A. and Mastanduno, M. (1988) Introduction: Approaches to Explaining American Foreign Economic Policy, International Organization, 42, 1, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, H.-D. (1986) Die amerikanischen Exportkontrollen als bündnispolitiches Problem, Osteuropa-Wirtschaft, 31,3, 188–200.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, H.-D. (1988) East-West Trade and Export Controls: The West German Perspective. In Bertsch, G. K. (ed.), Controlling East-West Trade and Technology Transfer: Power, Politics and Policies. Durham; Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Jentleson, B. W. (1988) The Western Alliance and East-West Energy Trade. In Bertsch, G. K. (ed.), Controlling East-West Energy Tradeand Technology Transfer: Power, Politics and Policies. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Karl, W.-D. and Krause, J. (1978) Aussenpolitischer Strukturwandel und parlamentarischer Entscheidungsprozess. In Haftendorn, H., Karl, W.-D., Krause, J. and Wilker, L. (eds.), Verwaltete Aussenpolilik: Sicherheits- und entspannungspolitische Entscheidungsprozesse in Bonn. Cologne: Verlag Wissenschaft und Politik.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P. (1987) Policy and Politics in West Germany: The Growth of a Semisovereign State. Philadel- phia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P. (1989) Stability and Change in the Emerging Third Republic. In Katzenstein, P. (ed.), Industry and Politics in West Germany: Toward the Third Republic. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koppe, H. and Koch, E. (1990) Bombengeschäfte: Tödliche Waffen für die Dritte Welt. Munich: Knesebeck & Schuler.Google Scholar
Krasner, S. (1978) Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, S. (1984) Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics, Comparative Politics, 16, 2, 223–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreile, M. (1977) West Germany: The Dynamics of Expansion, International Organization, 31, 4, 775–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreile, M. (1978) Osthandel und Ostpolitik. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Kubbig, B. W. (1981) Nuklearenergie und nukleare Proliferation: Die inneramerikanischen Auseindersetzungen um die Grundsatze der U.S.-Nonproliferationpolitik 1974–1980. Frankfurt: Haag + Herchen.Google Scholar
Loeck, C. (1978) Die Politik des Transfers konventioneller Rüstung: Strukturen und Einflussfaktoren im Entscheidungsprozess. In Haftendorn, H., Karl, W.-D., Krause, J. and Wiler, L. (eds.), Verwaltete Aussenpolitik: Sicherheits- und entspannungspolitische Entscheidungsprozesse in Bonn. Cologne: Verlag Wissenschaft und Politik.Google Scholar
Long, W. (1988) The Executive, Congress and Interest Groups in U.S. Export Control Policy: The National Organization of Power. In Bertsch, G. K. (ed.), Controlling East-West Trade and Technology Transfer: Power, Politics and Policies. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Long, W. (1989) U.S Export Control Policy: Executive Autonomy vs. Congressional Reform. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, R. B. and Wallace, D. L. (1985) The Domestic Constituencies of the Security Assistance Program. In Graves, E. and Hildreth, S. A. (eds.), U.S. Security Assistance: The Political Process. Lexington: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Mastanduno, M. (1988) Trade As a Strategic Weapon: American and Alliance Export Control Policy in the Early Postwar Period, International Organization, 42, 1, 121–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastanduno, M., Lake, D. A. and Ikenberry, G.J. (1989) Toward a Realist Theory of State Action, International Studies Quarterly, 33, 4, 457–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mclntyre, J. (1988) The Distribution of Power and the Interagency Politics of Licensing East-West High-Technology Trade. In Bertsch, G. K. (ed.), Controlling East-West Trade and Technology Transfer: Power, Politics and Policies. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Millohin, G. (1989) Bonn's Proliferation Policy, New York Times, 4 01 1989.Google Scholar
Müller, H. (1989) Nach den Skandalen: Deutsche Nichtverbreitungspolitik. HSFK-Report 5/ 1989, Frankfurt: Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences (1987) Balancing the National Interest: U.S. National Security Export Controls and Global Economic Competition. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
New York Times (1975) Nuclear Madness, 13 June.Google Scholar
New York Times (1986) Export Control List Debated, 14 May.Google Scholar
New York Times (1989a) Some Jews Favor Easing Soviet Trade Curbs, 5 February.Google Scholar
New York Times (1989b) U.S. Is Pressed on Tools for East Bloc, 9 October.Google Scholar
New York Times (1989c) U.S. Soviet Trade Talks Scheduled, 10 November.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, E. (1981) On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, E. (1987) Taking the State Seriously. In Weiner, M. and Huntington, S. P. (eds.), Understanding Political Development. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Ollig, G. (1975) Rechtliche Grundlagen des Innerdeutschen Handels. In Ehlermann, C.-D., Kupper, S., Lambrecht, H. and Ollig, G., Handelspartner DDR: Innerdeutsche Wirtschaftsbeziehungen. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Rode, R. (1986) Sicherheit versus Geschäft: Die Osthandelspolitik der USA von Nixon bis Carter. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Rosecrance, R. (1986) The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Safire, W. (1989) The German Problem, New York Times, 2 01.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. (1987) West Germany: The Policy of the Middle Way, foumal of Public Policy, 7, 2, 135–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieg, H., Fahning, H. and Rolling, K. F. (1963) Aussenwirtschaftsgesetz: Kommentar. Berlin: Franz Vahlen.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1985) Bringing the State Back In. In Evans, P., Rueschemeyer, D. and Skocpol, T. (eds.), Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skowronek, S. (1982) Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities 1887–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stent, A. (1980) From Embargo to Ostpolilik The Political Economy of West German-Soviet Relations 1955–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stent, A. (1983) Technology Transfer to the Soviet Union: A Challenge for the Cohesiveness of the Western Alliance, Arbeitspapiere zur Internationalen Politik, no. 24. Bonn: Europa-Union.Google Scholar
Storz, W. (1988) Gibt es überhaupt eine Export-Kontrolle?, Badische Zeitung, 24 12.Google Scholar
Stratmann, E. (1985) Made in Germany-Vom Weltmarkt zum Binnenmarkt. In Beckenbach, F., Muller, J., Pfriem, R. and Stratmann, E. (eds.), Grüne Wirtschaftspolitik: Machbare Utopien. Cologne: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.Google Scholar
Süddeutsche Zeitung (1990) COCOM-Revision steht bevor, 5 June.Google Scholar
Suleiman, E. N. (1987) State Structures and Clientelism: The French State Versus the ‘Notaires’, British Journal of Political Science, 17, 3, 257–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tudyka, K. (1969) Das Rohrenembargo, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Sonderheft, 1, 205–23.Google Scholar
US Arms Control and Disarmament Agency (1988) World Military Expenditures and Arms Transfers 1987. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
US Congress (1982) Executive-Legislative Consultation on U.S. Arms Sales. Committee on Foreign Affairs, Congress and Foreign Policy Series No. 7. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
US Congress (1990) Congressional Record, House, 6 06.Google Scholar
US Department of Commerce (1985) Export Administration Annual Report FY 1984. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
US Department of Commerce (1989) United States Trade: Performance in 1988. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
US Energy Research and Development Administration (1976) Final Environmental Statement: U.S. Nuclear Power Export Activities. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Wellmann, C. (1982) Gewerkschaftliche Alternativplanstrategie. In Brzoska, M., Guha, A.-A. and Wellmann, C., Das Geschdft mit dem Tod: Fakten & Hintergründe der Rüstungsindustrie. Frankfurt: Eichborn.Google Scholar
West, Germany (1961) Verhandlungen des Deutschen Bundestages, 3. Wahlperiode, Stenographische Berichte 3/142.Google Scholar
West, Germany (1989) Verhandlungen des Deutschen Bundestages, 11. Wahlperiode, Stenographische Berichte 11/153.Google Scholar
West, Germany (1990) Verhandlungen des Deutschen Bundestages, 11. Wahlperiode, Stenographische Berichte 11/215.Google Scholar
West, Germany, Bundestag, Deutscher (1985) Drucksache 10/3342.Google Scholar
West, Germany, Bundestag, Deutscher (1989a) Drucksache 11/3995.Google Scholar
West, Germany, Bundestag, Deutscher (1989b) Drucksache 11/6141.Google Scholar
Wilker, L. (1978) Das Brasilien-Geschäft - Ein ‘diplomatischer Betriebsunfall’? In Haftendorn, H., Karl, W.-D., Krause, J. and Wilker, L. (eds.), Verwaltele Aussenpolitik: Sicherheits- und entspannungspolitische Entscheidungsprozesse in Bonn. Cologne: Verlag Wissenchaft und Politik.Google Scholar
Wilker, L. (1980) Nuklearexport- und Nichtverbreitungspolitik - ein Prioritatenkonflikt für die Bundesrepublik? In Wilker, L. (ed.), Nuklearpolilik im Zielkonflikt: Verbreitung der Kemenergie zwischcn nationalem Interesse und intenationaler Kontrolle. Cologne: Verlag Wissenschaft und Politik.Google Scholar
Wirtschaftswoche.(1986) Liberaler Widerstand, 5 December.Google Scholar
Wörmann, C. (1982) Der Osthandel der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Politische Rahmenbedingungen und ökonomische Bedeutung. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Wolff, O. von Amerongen (1979) Aussenwirtschaft und Aussenpolitik: Aus den Anfangen des deutschen Osthandels nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg, Osteuropa, 29, 5, 419–24.Google Scholar