Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:54:13.133Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Determinants of Program Success and Failure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Harold Wolman
Harold Wolman
Affiliation:
Senior Research Associate, Public Finance, The Urban Institute, Washington DC*
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent social science research – particularly evaluation research and cost-benefit analysis – has produced a substantial and very useful literature on the impact of public policy and on the relationship of program inputs to outputs and outcomes. However, the explicit focus of these analytic techniques on impacts and outcomes does not systematically yield useful information on why programs have been successes or failures. Policy-makers faced with an evaluation of program success or failure obviously need to know something about the why question if they are to make needed adjustments in the program or carry the lessons of one program to other areas. This article attempts to present a comprehensive framework for explaining and understanding program performance. It is meant to have two uses and to serve two clienteles. First, it presents for social scientists a set of research questions to guide research into the determinants of program performance. Second, it provides public policy-makers with a set of action questions which should be asked and answered appropriately in the actual formulating and carrying out of public policy, as a means of enhancing the chances of program success. The framework is divided into two parts, the formulating process and the carrying out process, although these two processes may overlap considerably, both in time and in terms of substantive concerns. Program success may be impeded by problems or inadequacies in one or more of the components in either the formulating stage or the carrying out stage or in both.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , October 1981 , pp. 433 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baestleir, A.et. (1978) State grants and local development planning in the Federal Republic of Germany. In Hanf, K. and Scharpf, F. W. (eds.) erorganizational Policy Making. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bailey, Stephen K. and Mosler, Edith (1968) ESEA: The Office of Education Administers a Law. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.,Google Scholar
Bardach, E. (1977) The Implementation Game. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul (1978) The study of macro and micro implementation, Public Policy, 26.Google Scholar
Chadwin, Mark L. et al. (1977) The Employment Service: An Institutional Analysis, RRD Monograph 51. Washington DC: Department of Labor.Google Scholar
Coopers, and Lybrand, (1976) Recommendations for Near Term Field Organization Structure. Consultants study prepared for the Department of Housing and Urban Development: Washington DC.Google Scholar
Derthick, Martha (1972) New Towns-in-Town. Washington DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony (1967) Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunsire, A. (1978) The Execution Process, Vol. I: Implementation in a Bureaucracy. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. (1964) Modern Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. (1976) Social Problems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Friedan, B. J. and Kaplan, M. (1977) The Politics of Neglect: Urban Aid from Model Cities to Revenue Sharing. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hambleton, R. (1981) Implementing inner city policy: reflections from experience, Policy and Politics, 9, 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargrove, Erwin (1976) The Missing Link: The Study of the Implementation of Social Policy. Washington DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Hood, C. C. (1974) Administrative diseases: some types of dysfunctionality in administration, Public Administration, 52, 439–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, C. C. (1976) The Limits of Administration. London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Herbert (1967) The Forest Ranger. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Herbert (with the collaboration of Michael Couzens) (1973) Administrative Feedback. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Herbert (1975) Red Tape: Its Origins, Uses and Abuses. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Levine, Robert A. (1972) Public Planning: Failure and Redirection. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
McKay, D. I. and Cox, A. W. (1978) The Politics of Urban Change. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Mead, Lawrence (1977) Institutional analysis: an approach to implementation problems in Medicaid. Washington DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert (1949) Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Jerome T. (1971) Title I of ESEA: The politics of implementing federal education reform, Harvard Education Review, 41, 35–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pressman, Jeffrey L. and Wildavsky, Aaron B. (1973) Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1981) Control and Power in Central-Local Government Relations. Farnborough, Hants: Gower Press.Google Scholar
Rossi, Peter H. and Wright, Sonia R. (1977) Evaluation research: an assessment of theory, practice, and politics, Evaluation Quarterly, 1, 5–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultze, Charles L. (1977) The Public Use of Private Interest. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1927) Administrative Behavior, 2nd edition. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1960) The New Science of Management Decision. New York: Harper and Row.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, M. (1981) Programmes without policies: the case of inner cities. Paper presented to a Conference on Central and Local Government Relationships, Nuffield College, April 1981.Google Scholar
Waller, J. D.et al. (1976) Monitoring for Government Agencies. Washington DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Weiss, C. (1972) Evaluation Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Williams, Walter (1975) Special issue on implementation: editor's comments, Policy Analysis, 1, 451.Google Scholar
Wright, D. S. (1978) Understanding Intergovernmental Relations. North Scituate, Mass.: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar