Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:47:59.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Corporatism, Pluralism and Political Learning: A Systems Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Jenny Stewart
Jenny Stewart
Affiliation:
Public Policy, Australian National University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Whether corporatism matters or not is one of the most difficult and intriguing questions confronting policy analysts. One approach to the problem not previously adopted is to use systems analysis as a means of teasing out the implications of general structural differences between corporatist and pluralist polities. By using a framework derived from the systems analysis of Easton but incorporating elements of political competition and accountability, it is shown that corporatist and pluralist states differ significantly in the ways in which they process information and generate support. The combination of centralisation and consensus proves to be the key to the apparently greater learning capacity of corporatist systems. The analysis suggests that policymaking may itself be better understood as a learning mechanism rather than as an allocative process.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , July 1992 , pp. 243 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anton, Thomas J. (1980) Administered Politics: Elite Political Culture in Sweden. Amsterdam: Martinus Nijhoft.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, Karl W. (1963) The Nerves of Government. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dunsire, Andrew (1991) A cybernetic view of guidance, control and evaluation in the public sector. In The Public Sector: Challenge for Coordination and Learning, ed. Kaufmann, Franz-Xavier. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Easton, David (1979) A Systems Analysis of Political Life. Chicago: Phoenix.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh (1976) Policy Dynamics. In The Dynamics of Public Policy: a comparative analysis, ed. Rose, Richard. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hertzberg, Roberta and Ostrom, Vincent (1991) Votes and vetoes. In The Public Sector: Challenge for Coordination and Learning, ed. Kaufmann, Franz-Xavier. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hicks, Alexander (1988) National Collective Action and Economic Performance: a review article. International Studies Quarterly 32, 131–53.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers (1982) MITl and the Japanese Miracle: the Growth of Industrial Policy 1925–1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. (1985) Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. (1984) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend (1984) Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-one Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, C. E. (1965) The Intelligence of Democracy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. E. (1979) Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review 11/12, 517–26.Google Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico (1991) ‘Analyzing the public sector: shortcomings of policy science and political analysis’ in The Public Sector: Challenge for Coordination and Learning, ed. Kaufmann, Franz-Xavier. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
OECD (1988) The Newly Industrialising Countries: Challenge and Opportunity for OECD Industries. Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur (1982) The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Manfred G. (1982) Does corporatism matter? Economic crisis, politics and rates of unemployment in capitalist democracies in the 1970s. In Patterns of Corporatist Policymaking, eds Lehmbruch, Gerhard and Schmitter, Philippe C.. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Smith, Brian (1976) Policymaking in British Government: an Analysis of Power and Rationality. London: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Therborn, Goran (1987) ‘Does Corporatism really matter? The economic crisis and issues of political theory’. Journal of Public Policy 7, 259–84.Google Scholar
Wilensky, Harold L. and Turner, Lowell (1987) Democratic corporatism and policy linkages. University of California, Berkeley: Institute of International StudiesGoogle Scholar