Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:47:03.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing the Added Value of an EU Agency for Aviation Safety1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2011

Adriaan Schout
Adriaan Schout*
Affiliation:
European Studies, Clingendael Institute
*
dr. adriaan schout European Studies Programme, Clingendael Institute, PO Box 93080, 2509 The Hague, Netherlands, e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Irrespective of the level of government, public officials increasingly face the challenge of evaluating and making choices between more instruments. Agencies are intended to be a new and different type of governance instrument offering prospects for stronger input from experts, greater transparency and depoliticised decisions. Using ‘legitimacy’ as the framework, this study compares an agency (European Aviation Safety Agency) to comitology and its predecessor (a sui generis intergovernmental regulatory network). Although EASA is often heralded as a major change, the conclusions here are that its predecessor was quite effective and that comitology has been greatly improved and could have been explored as alternative instrument. Therefore, the agency solution was neither unavoidable nor necessarily better.

Keywords

agenciesEU governancelegitimacycomitologyaviation safetyinstruments
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , December 2011 , pp. 363 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This is an elaborated version of Schout (forthcoming). I would like to thank Martijn Groenleer and the referees for their constructive comments.

References

Bekkers, V.Edwards, A. (2006) Legitimacy and democracy. In Bekkers V., Dijkstra G. Edwards A. Fenger M. (eds.), Governance and the Democratic Deficit. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Bradley, K. (2006) Comitology and the Courts: Tales of the Unexpected. In Hofmann H. and Türk A. (eds.), EU Administrative Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Brandsma, G. (2010) Accounting for input in comitology committees: an uncomfortable silence. Journal of European Public Policy 17(4): 487–505.Google Scholar
Busuioc, M. (2009) Accountability, Control and Independence: The Case of European Agencies. European Law Journal 15(5): 599–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busuioc, M., Groenleer, M.Trondal, J. (forthcoming) Introducing the phenomenon of European Union agencies. In Busuioc M., Groenleer M. and Trondal J. (eds.), The Agency Phenomenon in the European Union. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
CEC (2000) Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing common rules in the field of civil aviation and creating a European aviation safety agency. COM(2000) 595final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
CEC (2001) European Governance: a White Paper. COM (2001)428final.Google Scholar
CEC (2008) European agencies – The way forward. COM(2008)135final.Google Scholar
CEC (2009) Impact assessment guidelines. SEC(2009)92.Google Scholar
CEC (2010) Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers. COM(2010)83final.Google Scholar
Christensen, T.Lægreid, L. (2006) Autonomy and regulation: coping with agencies in the modern state. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Curtin, D. (2005) Delegation to EU Non-Majoritarian Agencies and Emerging Practices of Public Accountability. In Gerardin D. and Petit N. (eds.), Regulation Through Agencies in the EU. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dehousse, R. (1997) Regulation by Networks in the European Community: The Role of European Agencies. Journal of European Public Policy 4(2): 246–261.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P.Powell, W. (1983) The iron cage revisited; institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dukes, W. (1965) N = 1. Psychological Bulletin 64(1): 74–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eureval (2008) Meta-study on decentralized agencies, final report. Evaluation for the Commission. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
European Council (2006) Council decision of 17 July 2006 amending Decision 1999/468/EC laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission, Official Journal of the European Union L 200/11, 22 July 2006.Google Scholar
European Court of Auditors (2008) The European Union's agencies: Getting results. Luxembourg: Special Report No. 5/2008.Google Scholar
Everson, E., Majone, G., Metcalfe, L.Schout, A. (1999) The Role of Specialised Agencies in Decentralising EU Governance – Report for the European Commission. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Groenleer, M. (2009) The autonomy of European Union agencies. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
Groenleer, M., Kaeding, M.Versluis, E. (2010) Regulatory governance through EU agencies of the European Union? Journal of European Public Policy 17(8): 1212–1230.Google Scholar
Héritier, A.Lehmkuhl, D. (2008) The Shadow of Hierarchy and New Modes of Governance. Journal of Public Policy 8(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horvath and Partners (2007) Evaluation on the Implementation of EU Regulation 1592/2002; final report. Version of December 2007. Published on the website of EASA.Google Scholar
Joerges, Ch.Neyer, J. (1997) From Intergovernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes: the Constitutionalisation of Comitology. European Law Journal 3: 274–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, F. (forthcoming) EU Agencies and parliamentary discharge. In Monda et al. (eds.), EU Agencies in between the EU institutions and Member States. Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Kassim, H.Le Galès, P. (2010) Exploring governance in a multi-level polity: A policy instruments approach. West European Politics 33(1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassim, H.Stevens, H. (2010) Air transport and the European Union. Houndsmill: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelemen, D.Tarrant, A. (forthcoming) The political foundations of the eurocracy, West European Politics.Google Scholar
Lascoumes, P.Le Galès, P. (2007) Understanding public policy through its instruments – from the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance 20(1): 1–21.Google Scholar
Lindseth, P. (1999) Democratic Legitimacy and the Administrative Character of Supranationalism. Columbia Law Review 99(3): 628–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, G. (1996) Regulating Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Majone, G. (2002) Functional Interests: European Agencies. In Peterson J. and Shackleton M. (eds.), The Institutions of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mayntz, R. (2010) Legitimacy and compliance in transnational governance. Cologne: MPIfG Working Paper 10/5.Google Scholar
Medina Report (1997) European Parliament Final BSE Inquiry Report. Rapporteur Medina Ortega, A4-0020/97/A.Google Scholar
Moe, T. (1987) Interests, institutions and positive theory: The politics of the NLRB. Studies in American Political Development 2: 236–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, E. (2001) Governing by numbers: delegated legislation and everyday policy making. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Peters, G.Van Nispen, F. (eds.) (1998) Public policy instruments: evaluating the tools of public administration. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Pierre, J.Peters, B. G. (2009) From a club to a bureaucracy: JAA, EASA, and European aviation regulation. Journal of European Public Policy 16(3): 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollack, M. (2003) The engines of European integration. Delegation, agency and agenda-setting in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, C., Talbot, C., Smullen, A.Caulfield, J. (2004) Agencies: How Governments Do Things Through Semi-Autonomous Organizations. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Powell, V. (1987) Improving Public Enterprise Performance: Concepts and Techniques. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
Scharpf, (1999) Governing Europe: effective and democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schout, A. (2008) Agencies and inspection powers – the case of EASA as new of more of the same? In Vos E. (ed.), European Risk Governance: its Science, its Inclusiveness and its Effectiveness. Connex Book Series: Mannheim University.Google Scholar
Schout, A. (forthcoming) Changing the EU's institutional landscape? In Busuioc M., Groenleer M. and Trondal J. (eds.), The Agency Phenomenon in the European Union. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Schout, A.Pereyra, F. (2011) The institutionalisation of EU agencies. Public Administration 89(2): 418–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smismans, S. (2004) Law, Legitimacy and European Governance: Functional Participation in Social Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staniland, M. (2008) A Europe of the air. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Thatcher, M.Stone Sweet, A. (2002) Theory and practice of delegation to non-majoritarian institutions. West European Politics 25(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treib, O., Bähr, H.Falkner, G. (2007) Modes of governance: towards a conceptual clarification. Journal of European Public Policy 14(1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trondal, J. (2010) Emergent European executive order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vibert, F. (2006) The limits of regulatory reform in the EU. Economic Affairs 26(2): 17–22.Google Scholar
Vos, E. (2000) EU Food Safety Regulation in the Aftermath of the BSE Crisis. Journal of Consumer Policy 23(3): 227–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vos, E. (2009) 45 Years of Comitology. Maastricht: Faculty of Law Paper 2009/3.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1968) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. New York: Bedminster Press.Google Scholar
Woll, C. (2006) The road to external representation: the European Commission's activism in international air transport. Journal of European Public Policy 13(1): 52–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, R. (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar