Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:11:23.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Informal patients in secure wards: restriction of movement or deprivation of liberty?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2006

J Laidlaw  and
D Buckle
J Laidlaw
Affiliation:
Montpellier Low Secure Unit, Gloucester, GL1 3WL, England
D Buckle
Affiliation:
Montpellier Low Secure Unit, Gloucester, GL1 3WL, England

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Those requiring inpatient psychiatric care should be managed in the lowest level of security necessary in a ward close to their home area. The presence of informal (voluntary) patients on secure wards appears incompatible with this principle. Can such situations be justified?

Type
Editorial
Information
Journal of Psychiatric Intensive Care , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , December 2005 , pp. 61 - 63
Copyright
© 2006 NAPICU

References

Jones, R. (2004) Mental Health Act Manual, London: Sweet and Maxwell.
Jones, R. (2005) Mental Health Act Manual: 1st Supplement, London: Sweet and Maxwell.
Mental Health Act Commission (2005) Policy Briefing for Commissioners – Issue Eleven, Available from internet: http//:www.mhac.org.uk
Puri, B., Brown, R., McKee, H., Treaseden, I. (2005) Mental Health Law: A Practical Guide, London: Hodder Arnold.