Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:22:36.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transforming the Progressive Era Welfare State: Activists for the Blind and Blind Benefits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Thomas A. Krainz
Thomas A. Krainz
Affiliation:
Framingham State College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On the evening of 21 November 1918, more than one hundred people gathered at Sullivan's Hall in Denver, Colorado, to celebrate voters’ recent approval of the Act for the Relief of the Adult Blind, a statewide initiative commonly referred to as blind benefits or blind pensions or blind aid. The new law guaranteed up to $300 annually in cash relief for each impoverished blind resident. The evening's entertainment included piano, violin, and vocal solos and duets as well as readings of poetry and literature. While people listened, they enjoyed a simple assortment of sandwiches, pies, and doughnuts. The electoral victory capped years of hard work by a small group of dedicated activists, most of whom were themselves blind. One leader of the local blind community, Mrs. Jennie Jackson, addressed the gathering to thank those who had helped to secure the initiative's approval and to proclaim joyously that “the adoption of this bill will be a great benefit to many of the blind of this state.”

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Policy History , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , April 2003 , pp. 223 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Society of the United Workers for the Blind of Colorado Minutes, vol. 1, located at the National Federation of the Blind of Colorado, Littleton, Colorado, 102–104.Google Scholar

2. Irwin, Robert B. and Irwin, Mary B., Blind Relief Laws and Their Administration (Red Cross Institute for the Blind, 1919), 20–43Google Scholar; Best, Harry, Blindness and the Blind in the United States (New York, 1934), 549–551.Google Scholar

3. Bureau of the Census, The Blind Population of the United States, 1920: A Statistical Analysis of the Data Obtained at the Fourteenth Decennial Census (Washington, D.C., 1928), 110–111.Google Scholar

4. Gordon, Linda, Pitied But Not Entitled: Single Mothers and the History of Welfare, 1890–1935 (New York, 1994)Google Scholar; Ladd-Taylor, Molly, Mother-Work: Women, Child Welfare, and the State, 1890–1930 (Chicago, 1994)Google Scholar; Mink, Gwendolyn, The Wages of Motherhood: Inequality in the Welfare State, 1917–1942 (Ithaca, 1995)Google Scholar; Muncy, Robyn, Creating a Female Dominion in American Reform, 1890–1935 (New York, 1991)Google Scholar; Skocpol, Theda, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States (Cambridge, Mass., 1992)Google Scholar; Nelson, Barbara J., “The Origins of the Two-Channel Welfare State: Workmen's Compensation and Mothers' Aid,” in Women, the State, and Welfare, ed. Gordon, Linda (Madison, 1990), 123–151.Google Scholar

5. Blind benefits are not the only form of welfare that does not fit into the two-gendered welfare track. See Willrich, Michael, “Home Slackers: Men, the State, and Welfare in Modern America,” Journal of American History 87 (09 2000): 460–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. Muncy, Female Dominion; Patterson, James T., America's Struggle Against Poverty, 1900–1985 (Cambridge, Mass., 1986), 20–27Google Scholar; Trattner, Walter I., From Poor Law to Welfare State: A History of Social Welfare in America (New York, 1974), 193–211Google Scholar; Lubove, Roy, The Professional Altruist: The Emergence of Social Work as a Career, 1880–1930 (Cambridge, Mass., 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. Muncy, Female Dominion, 3–37.

8. Brown, Esther Lucile, Social Work as a Profession (New York, 1942), 19–31Google Scholar; Fitzpatrick, Ellen, Endless Crusade: Women Social Scientists and Progressive Reform (New York, 1990)Google Scholar. The first formal training for social workers took place in six-week courses offered by the New York Charity Organization Society beginning in 1898. With the advent of World War I, fifteen universities cooperated with the Red Cross to offer courses in social work.

9. Richmond, Mary E., Social Diagnosis (New York, 1917)Google Scholar; idem, What Is Social Case Work? (New York, 1922).

10. Krainz, Thomas A., “Implementing Poor Relief: Colorado's Progressive-Era Welfare State” (Ph.D. diss., University of Colorado, 2000), 102–130.Google Scholar

11. Muncy, Female Dominion; Lubove, Professional Altruist; Trattner, Poor Law to Welfare State, 193–211.

12. Krainz, “Implementing Poor Relief,” 48–49; for Addams's visit, see the Colorado Springs Gazette, 17 February 1902, 1.

13. Krainz, “Implementing Poor Relief,” 121–22.

14. Pascoe, Peggy, Relations of Rescue: The Search for Female Moral Authority in the American West, 1874–1939 (New York, 1990), 102.Google Scholar

15. Odem, Mary E., Delinquent Daughters: Protecting and Policing Adolescent Female Sexuality in the United States, 1885–1920 (Chapel Hill, 1995), 158.Google Scholar

16. Scotch, Richard K., “American Disability Policy in the Twentieth Century,” in The New Disability History: American Perspectives, ed. Longmore, Paul K. and Umansky, Lauri (New York, 2001), 377.Google Scholar

17. For an overview of the rise of interest-group politics during the Progressive Era, see Clemens, Elisabeth S., The People's Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890–1925 (Chicago, 1997)Google Scholar; McConnel, Grant, Private Power and American Democracy (New York, 1966)Google Scholar. The growing field of disability history has mainly focused on the post–World War II years. See Shapiro, Joseph P., No Pity: People with Disabilities Forging a New Civil Rights Movement (New York, 1993)Google Scholar. For studies about blind people, see tenBroek, Jacobus and Matson, Floyd W., Hope Deferred: Public Welfare and the Blind (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1959)Google Scholar; Koestler, Frances A., The Unseen Minority: A Social History of Blindness in America (New York, 1976)Google Scholar; Vaughan, C. Edwin, The Struggle of Blind People for Self-Determination: The Dependency-Rehabilitation Conflict: Empowerment in the Blindness Community (Springfield, Ill., 1993)Google Scholar. Scholars of disability history have recently begun focusing on pre–World War II events. See Longmore, Paul K. and Goldberger, David, “The League of the Physically Handicapped and the Great Depression: A Case Study in the New Disability History,” Journal of American History 87 (12 2000): 888–922CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, and Longmore, Paul K. and Umansky, Lauri, eds., The New Disability History: American Perspectives (New York, 2001).Google Scholar

18. In 1900, out of one million Civil War veterans 741,259 were receiving pensions. By 1915, pensions were given to 396,370 out of 424,000 surviving veterans. In 1920, the number of living veterans had drastically lowered to only 244,000; five years later, only 127,000 would still be alive. See Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970, Bicentennial edition (Washington, D.C, 1975), pt. 2, 1145Google Scholar; Skocpol, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers, 102–51, especially the table on page 109; Quadagno, Jill, The Transformation of Old Age Security: Class and Politics in the American Welfare State (Chicago, 1988), 36–49.Google Scholar

19. Krainz, “Implementing Poor Relief,” 225–87, 361–65.

20. Quote, Best, Harry, The Blind: Their Condition and the Work Being Done for Them in the United States (New York, 1919), 83Google Scholar; see pages 86–88 on stereotyping.

21. Ibid., 26–29.

22. Ibid., 46.

23. Quote, Keller, Helen, “The Heaviest Burden on the Blind,” Outlook for the Blind 1 (04 1907): 10Google Scholar; see also Irwin, Robert B., As I Saw It (New York, 1955), 169.Google Scholar

24. “New Associations for the Blind,” Outlook for the Blind 2 (07 1908): 59Google Scholar; “The Scotoic Aid Society of Missouri—a Foreword,” Outlook for the Blind 1 (July 1907): 47; “Maine Association for the Blind,” Outlook for the Blind 1 (April 1907): 3; Hubbard, Samuel F., “Association and Commission for the Blind,” Outlook for the Blind 1 (04 1907): 4Google Scholar. While statewide organizations were the most powerful instruments of change, two national associations did exist: the American Association of Instructors of the Blind, which mainly represented educators of blind children and adults, and the American Association of Workers for the Blind, which represented the rank and file of blind people as well as those that worked with the blind. In addition, two important publications, the Matilda Ziegler Magazine for the Blind and the Outlook for the Blind, began publishing in 1907 and allowed local communities to stay informed of events and debates in other parts of the nation.

25. Best, The Blind, 676–78.

26. “The Scotoic Aid Society of Missouri—a Foreword,” 47–48.

27. “Maine Association for the Blind,” 3; Hubbard, “Association and Commission for the Blind,” 4.

28. “Maine Association for the Blind,” 3; Hubbard, “Association and Commission for the Blind,” 4; Koestler, The Unseen Minority, 37–44.

29. Denver Post, 24 August 1933, 6; Rocky Mountain News, 24 August 1933, 6; “Mrs. Jennie Caward Jackson,” Outlook for the Blind 27 (October 1933): 188–89.

30. Green, S. M., “State Aid and Maintenance of the Adult Blind,”in Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections,1910(Fort Wayne, Ind., 1910), 291Google Scholar. This statistical observation became widely know for the first time with the publication in 1906 of a special census report on the blind and the deaf, Bureau of the Census, Special Reports—The Blind and The Deaf, 1900 (Washington, D.C., 1906).Google Scholar

31. Seventh Biennial Report, Colorado State Board of Charities and Corrections, 1904 (Denver, 1905), 129.Google Scholar

32. Bureau of the Census, The Blind in the United States, 1920 (Washington, D.C., 1923), 14.Google Scholar

33. Campbell, Charles F. F., “Problems of the Blind, Especially the Adult Blind,”in Proceeding of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections, 1912(Fort Wayne, Ind.,1912), 79.Google Scholar

34. Perry, Newell, “What Do the Blind Want?” Outlook for the Blind 5 (10 1911): 69.Google Scholar

35. Quoted in Best, The Blind, 477, originally located in a Report of Maryland School, 1873, 11.

36. Irwin, As I Saw It, 151.

37. Best, The Blind, 509–12; for more information on the workshop movement, see pages 473–517; Irwin, As I Saw It, 151–58; tenBroek and Matson, Hope Deferred, 249–54. In 1893, Connecticut opened a workshop for the adult blind, followed by Michigan in 1903, New York in 1906, and Maryland in 1908.

38. “Colorado Workshop,” Outlook for the Blind 1 (01 1908): 132Google Scholar; “Colorado Industrial Workshop for the Blind,” Outlook for the Blind 1 (07 1907): 33–34Google Scholar; “Mrs. Jennie Caward Jackson,” 188–89; Rocky Mountain News, 24 August 1933, 6; Grigg, Efay Nelson, “The Colorado State Board of Charities and Corrections” (Master's thesis, University of Denver, 1932), 97–98Google Scholar; Denver Post, 24 August 1933, 6.

39. Quote from Colorado Federation of Women's Clubs Official Year Book, 1911–1912, University of Colorado Archives, Boulder, 55Google Scholar; Sinton, Mary Louise, “A History of the Woman's Club of Denver: 1894–1915” (Master's thesis, University of Denver, 1980), 138Google Scholar; Denver Post, 24 August 1933, 6; Rocky Mountain News, 24 August 1933, 6; “Mrs. Jennie Caward Jackson,” 188–89.

40. Quote, Biennial Report of the State Teacher for the Adult Blind, 1916–1918 (Denver, 1919), 6Google Scholar; see also pages 8 and 10. For examples of travel, see Biennial Report of the State Teacher for the Adult Blind, 1914–1916 (Denver, 1916), 9–10.Google Scholar

41. Cripple Creek Times and Victor Daily Record, 27 August 1915, 2.

42. State Teacher for the Adult Blind, 1916–1918, 8.

43. Ibid., 1 and 6. For more examples of the condition of the blind, see ibid., 1, 6, and 9.

44. Biennial Report of the State Teacher for Adult Blind, 1918–1920 (Denver, 1920), 8.Google Scholar

45. Report of the Board of Control of the Colorado Industrial Workshop for the Blind, 1910 (Denver, 1910), 3 and 6Google Scholar; Report of the Board of Control of the Colorado Industrial Workshop for the Blind, 1912 (Denver, 1913), 3.Google Scholar

46. Quote, Colorado Industrial Workshop for the Blind, 1912, 11; see also Colorado Industrial Workshop for the Blind, 1910, 10.

47. Colorado Industrial Workshop for the Blind, 1910, 6; Colorado Industrial Workshop for the Blind, 1912, 9

48. Colorado Industrial Workshop for the Blind, 1912, 3.

49. Quote, Tenth Biennial Report of the State Board of Charities and Corrections of Colorado (Denver, 1910), 21Google Scholar; see also Colorado Industrial Workshop for the Blind, 1910, 8; Colorado Industrial Workshop for the Blind, 1912, 11.

50. Colorado Industrial Workshop for the Blind, 1910, 9.

51. Quote, Minutes of the State Board of Charities and Corrections, 1913, Box 18626, Colorado State Archives, Denver, p. 88Google Scholar; Minutes of State Board of Charities and Corrections, 1914, Box 18626, Colorado State Archives, Denver, p. 121Google Scholar; Minutes of State Board of Charities and Corrections, 1915, Box 18626, Colorado State Archives, Denver, p. 111.Google Scholar

52. Colorado Industrial Workshop for the Blind, 1912, 4.

53. Report of the Board of Control of the Colorado Industrial Workshop for the Blind, 1914 (Denver, 1914), 4Google Scholar; Board of Charities and Corrections, 1914, 128.

54. Quote, Board of Charities and Corrections, 1914, 128; Colorado Industrial Workshop for the Blind, 1914, 7.

55. Board of Charities and Corrections, 1914, 128.

56. Quotes, Board of Charities and Corrections, 1915, 111; Minutes of the State Board of Charities and Corrections, December 12, 1916 to November 12, 1918, Box 18626, Colorado State Archives, Denver, 103.Google Scholar

57. Thirteenth Biennial Report of the State Board of Charities and Corrections of Colorado (Denver, 1916), 19.Google Scholar

58. Best, The Blind, 565; Irwin, Robert B. and McKay, Evelyn C., Blind Relief Laws: Their Theory and Practice (New York, 1929), 105.Google Scholar

59. Irwin, Robert B., “Relation of Commission to Other Agencies,” Outlook for the Blind 11 (04 1917): 39.Google Scholar

60. Forbes, James, “A Feudal Survival—the Blind Pension,” Charities and the Commons 15 (3 02 1906): 616, 618.Google Scholar

61. Quote, Best, The Blind, 549; see also Irwin and Irwin, Blind Relief Laws, 21.

62. Wright, Lucy, “The Pension Question in Massachusetts,” Outlook for the Blind 9 (01 1916): 75–76Google Scholar; Best, The Blind, 549; Irwin and Irwin, Blind Relief Laws, 4, 21.

63. Quote, Lies, Eugene T., “Public Outdoor Relief in Chicago,”in Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections, 1916(Chicago,1916), 346Google Scholar; see also Wright, “The Pension Question,” 74; Best, The Blind, 550; Irwin and Irwin, Blind Relief Laws, 5.

64. Wright, “The Pension Question,” 77–78; Irwin, “Relation of Commission,” 41; Lies, “Public Outdoor Relief,” 347.

65. Irwin and Irwin, Blind Relief Laws, 5.

66. Irwin, “Relation of Commission,” 39.

67. Irwin and Irwin, Blind Relief Laws, 5.

68. Stricker, Louis, “Blindness in Hamilton County,” Studies from the Helen S. Trounstine Foundation 1 (1 09 1918): 63.Google Scholar

69. Best, The Blind, 551.

70. First quote, Irwin and Irwin, Blind Relief Laws, 3; second quote, “Ohio Relief for the Blind,” Outlook for the Blind 9 (October 1915): 45; see also Wright, “The Pension Question,” 73.

71. Stricker, “Blindness in Hamilton County,” 104; Irwin and Irwin, Blind Relief Laws, 20–24, 27–28.

72. First quote, Irwin and Irwin, Blind Relief Laws, 3; second quote, “Ohio Relief for the Blind,” 45.

73. Shotwell, Ambrose M., “Outdoor Relief for the Blind,” Outlook for the Blind 11 (07 1917): 30.Google Scholar

74. Irwin, “Relation of Commission,” 41.

75. Colorado Industrial Workshop for the Blind, 1912, 4–5.

76. United Workers for the Blind of Colorado Minutes, vol. 1, 46.Google Scholar

77. Bureau of the Census, The Blind Population, 1920, 20–21.

78. Ibid., 46.

79. House Journal of the General Assembly of the State of Colorado, Twenty-first Session (Denver, 1917), 75.Google Scholar

80. Irwin and Irwin, Blind Relief Laws, 14.

81. State Teacher for the Adult Blind, 1916–1918, 8; Irwin and Irwin, Blind Relief Laws, 38.

82. Denver Post, 10 August 1941, sec. 1, 10; 18 January 1947, 2; 23 January 1947, 4.

83. Irwin and Irwin, Blind Relief Laws, 38.

84. United Workers for the Blind of Colorado Minutes, vol. 1, 40, 45–46.Google Scholar

85. Quotes, Rocky Mountain News, 31 January 1917, 2; see also United Workers for the Blind of Colorado Minutes, vol. 1, 52, 56Google Scholar; Irwin and Irwin, Blind Relief Laws, 38.

86. United Workers for the Blind of Colorado Minutes, vol. 1, 56.Google Scholar

87. Quote, Irwin and Irwin, Blind Relief Laws, 38; see also United Workers for the Blind of Colorado Minutes, vol. 1, 58, 60.Google Scholar

88. United Workers for the Blind of Colorado Minutes, vol. 1, 66–67, 72.Google Scholar

89. Ibid., 81.

90. Quote, State Teacher for Adult Blind, 1916–1918, 8; see also United Workers for the Blind of Colorado Minutes, vol. 1, 94.Google Scholar

91. Colorado Federation of Women's Clubs Official Year Book, 1918–1919, University of Colorado Archives, Boulder, Colorado, 92–93Google Scholar; Abstract of Votes Cast-1918 Election-State of Colorado (Denver, 1919), 26–27Google Scholar; Irwin and Irwin, Blind Relief Laws, 38.

92. State Teacher for Adult Blind, 1918–1920, 7–8.

93. Costilla County Commissioner Records, vol. 7, Costilla County Courthouse, San Luis, Colorado, 86–87.Google Scholar

94. Biennial Report of Auditor of State of Colorado, 1919–1920 (Denver, 1920)Google Scholar, see chart in back.

95. Fourteenth Biennial Report of the State Board of Charities and Corrections of Colorado (Denver, 1918), 57.Google Scholar

96. Quote, Laws Passed at the Twenty-second Session of the General Assembly of the State of Colorado (Denver, 1919), 313Google Scholar. For the entire law, see 310–14.

97. Twenty-second Session of the General Assembly, 311–13; Blind Benefit Application, Box 26959, Colorado State Archives, Denver.

98. Quote, Twenty-second Session of the General Assembly, 311. For the entire law, see 310–14.

99. Montezuma County Commissioners Records, vol. 3, Montezuma County Courthouse, Cortez, Colorado, 579.Google Scholar

100. Twenty-second Session of the General Assembly, 312.

101. Montezuma County Commissioners Records, vol. 3, 579Google Scholar; Montezuma County Poor Reports, 1901–1910 and 1912–19, Boxes 4967A and 4968A, Colorado State Archives, Denver.Google Scholar

102. Teller County Poor Reports, 1919–1920, Boxes 4967A and 4968A, Colorado State Archives, Denver.Google Scholar

103. United Workers for the Blind of Colorado Minutes, vol. 1, 117.Google Scholar

104. United Workers for the Blind of Colorado Minutes, vol. 1, 124.Google Scholar

105. Ibid., 140.

106. Krainz, “Implementing Poor Relief,” 266–80.

107. Rev. Brooks, Charles F., “The Activities and Administration of a State Central Authority for Work with the Adult Blind” (Master's thesis, University of Denver, 1939), 85Google Scholar; Grace Eleanor Wilson, “The History and Development of the Denver Bureau of Public Welfare,” Denver Department of Social Services' informal archives, 15–16.

108. Quote, Twenty-second Session of the General Assembly, 312; see also Brooks, “Work with the Adult Blind,” 85; Wilson, “Denver Bureau of Public Welfare,” 15–16.

109. Auditor of State of Colorado, 1919–1920, 130.

110. Mrs. Lute Wilcox to Governor Oliver H. Shoup, 1922, Box 26959, Colorado State Archives, Denver.

111. Bureau of the Census, The Blind Population, 1920, 110–11.

112. United Workers for the Blind of Colorado Minutes, vol. 1, 140.Google Scholar

113. Biennial Report of Auditor of State of Colorado, 1921–1922 (Denver, 1923), 8.Google Scholar

114. Mrs. Lute Wilcox to Governor Oliver H. Shoup, 1922.

115. Guy T. Justis to Mrs. Lute Wilcox, 12 October 1923, and Mr. Lute Wilcox to Guy T. Justis, 15 October 1923, United Workers for the Blind of Colorado, Minutes, vol. 1, located inside the back cover.

116. Denver Times, 23 August 1917, 1; Rocky Mountain News, 23 January 1924, 11; Wilson, “Denver Bureau of Public Welfare,” 17; Grigg, “The Colorado State Board of Charities and Corrections,” 110; First Biennial Report of the State Department of Charities and Corrections, 1923–24 (Denver, 1925), 7.

117. State Department of Charities and Corrections, 1923–24, 29–32.

118. Ibid., 33.

119. United Workers for the Blind of Colorado, Minutes, vol. 1, 279.Google Scholar

120. Quote, “Vinton, 1921 A.A.W.B. Convention,” Outlook for the Blind 15 (Summer 1921): 87Google Scholar; Biennial Report of the State Teacher for Adult Blind, 1920–1922 (Denver, 1923), 6Google Scholar; Koestler, The Unseen Minority, 13–24.

121. Latimer, H. R., “The Importance of Organization in Work for the Blind,” Outlook for the Blind 16 (Summer 1922): 43.Google Scholar

122. For examples of this trend, see “Getting a Job for the Blind,” Outlook for the Blind 16 (09 1923): 22–24Google Scholar; Childs, J. J., “Blindness as Affected by the Popular Attitude,” 17 (12 1923): 29–31Google Scholar; “Opportunity—Not Pity,” 17 (March 1924): 36; “The Right Man in the Right Place,” 18 (September 1924): 40; “Blindness Versus Employment,” 18 (December 1924): 49–50.

123. State Department of Charities and Corrections, 1923–24, 29; “American Foundation for the Blind, Nation-Wide Service,” Outlook for the Blind, 18 (03 1925): 6Google Scholar; “What the American Foundation for the Blind Has Done During 1924 and 1925,” Outlook for the Blind 19 (12 1925): 8.Google Scholar

124. Rocky Mountain News, 24 February 1925, 3. Helen Keller's strong endorsement of blind people's ability to support themselves predates her association with the AFB. See Keller, Helen, Out of the Dark: Essays, Letters, and Addresses on Physical and Social Vision (Garden City, N.Y., 1914), 125–259Google Scholar; Kim Nielsen, “Helen Keller and the Politics of Civic Fitness,” in New Disability History, 268–72; and Catherine J. Kudlick, “The Outlook of The Promise and the Problem with the Outlook: Two Advocacy Journals Reinvent Blind People in Turn-of-the-Century America,” in New Disability History, 200–202.

125. Rocky Mountain News, 27 February 1925, 11.

126. Jackson, Kenneth T., The Ku Klux Klan in the City, 1915–1930 (New York, 1967), 216.Google Scholar

127. Goldberg, Robert Alan, Hooded Empire: The Ku Klux Klan in Colorado (Urbana, Ill., 1981), 8.Google Scholar

128. House Journal of the General Assembly of the State of Colorado, Twenty-fifth Session (Denver, 1925), 105–112, quote on page 111.Google Scholar

129. Goldberg, Hooded Empire, 86.

130. Ibid., 87–95; Senate Journal of the General Assembly of the State of Colorado, Twenty-fifth Session (Denver, 1925), 1156Google Scholar; House Journal of the State of Colorado, Twenty-fifth Session, 1236–37.

131. Laws Passed at the Twenty-fifth Session of the General Assembly of the State of Colorado (Denver, 1925), quotes 169, 172Google Scholar. For the entire law, see 168–76.

132. Wilcox, Lute, “President's Report for 1925,” Society of the United Workers for the Blind of Colorado, Minutes, vol. 2, the National Federation of the Blind of Colorado, Littleton, located between pages 6 and 7.Google Scholar

133. United Workers for the Blind of Colorado, Minutes, vol. 1, 299.Google Scholar

134. Wilcox, “President's Report for 1925.”

135. “Report of the State Commission for the Blind from June 2, 1925 to December 1, 1926,” Box 26962, File 10, Colorado State Archives, Denver, 1. While the United Workers were powerless to reverse completely the changes in the blind benefit law, they were, nevertheless, able to enact some small modifications. Another blind benefit law passed the legislature in 1927, which softened the previous act. The 1927 law allowed, in part, applicants under forty to receive benefits when the commission believed “the case is extreme.” Despite these legal changes, the state's spending for blind benefits remained largely unchanged. See Laws Passed at the Twenty-sixth Session of the General Assembly of the State of Colorado (Denver, 1927), 210–214, quote 213Google Scholar; “The State-wide Social Welfare Survey of Colorado—The Administration of Colorado's Blind Benefit Act,” Colorado Historical Society, Mss 1224, File Folder 1, Denver, 1.

136. “Report of the State Commission for the Blind from June 2, 1925 to December 1, 1926,” 2–4.

137. “Biennial Report of the State Commission for the Blind, 1928–1930,” Box 13791, Colorado State Archives, Denver, 4.Google Scholar

138. Best, Blindness and the Blind, 550–54.

139. tenBroek and Matson, Hope Deferred, 59.

140. Quote, Koestler, The Unseen Minority, 178, see also 176–79; tenBroek and Matson, Hope Deferred, 59–63; Irwin, As I Saw It, 178–81.

141. The creation of the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program in 1972 attempted to standardize and unify state-run programs, including Title X; nevertheless, various disabilities and causes of poverty still receive different treatment within SSI and in other welfare programs. In fact, at the same time that the federal government created SSI, it also established a separate program for black-lung sufferers, once again fracturing the welfare state. See Berkowitz, Edward D., Disabled Policy: America's Programs for the Handicapped (New York, 1987).Google Scholar