Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-5wl6q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-10T23:06:07.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reply to Rogers Smith

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

Karen Orren
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Forum
Copyright
Copyright © The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. To be distinguished, however, from Smith's overreaching on the point. I concluded my earlier comment: “If one were asked to reduce American liberal culture to a single principle of momentum, it would be resistance to established hierarchy. For new situations, inspiration might well be sought in other directions.” Smith transposes these words as Orren's “insisting … that the ‘single principle of momentum’ of American political culture is ‘resistance to established hierarchy,’” a posture Smith deems “peculiar” and potentially supportive of “dangerous complacency.” In any case, he says, it is a conclusion my “meager evidence” has not “earned.” See note 1 in my comment above on the occasion for this affront to natural justice.

2. Orren, Karen, “The Union Officer Before and After the Wagner Act,” Industrial Relations Research Association, Proceedings (forthcoming), 1996.Google Scholar

3. See Orren, Karen, “A War Between Officers: The Enforcement of Slavery Law in the Northern United States” (Part 1), Annual Meeting of the Social Science History Association, 1993, 37 pp.Google Scholar; and (Part 2): “Habeas Corpus,” Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, 1994, 57 pp.

4. See Britton, ed. Nichols, F. M. (1865), vol. 1, 197Google Scholar; SirSmith, Thomas, De Republica Anglorum, ed. Dewar, Mary (1982), 135–36Google Scholar; SirPollock, Frederick and Maitland, Frederic William, The History of English Law Before the Time of Edward I, vol. 1 (1968)Google Scholar, chap. 2, sec. 2. See also Maitland, F. W., Domesday Book and Beyond (1960), 4761Google Scholar; and Dockes, Pierre, Medieval Slavery and Liberation (1982), 238–39.Google Scholar

5. Pollock, and Maitland, , History of English Law, vol. 1, chap. 2, secs. 6 and 7Google Scholar. See also Williams, Robert A., “The Algebra of Federal Indian Law: The Hard Trail of Decolonizing and Americanizing the White Man's Indian Jurisprudence,” Wisconsin Law Review 1986 (1986), 219–99Google Scholar; and Bush, Jonathan A., “‘You're Gonna Miss Me When I'm Gone’: Early Modem Common Law Discourse and the Case of the Jews,” Wisconsin Law Review 1993 (1993): 1225–85.Google Scholar