Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:28:16.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clio's Lost Tribe: Public Policy History Since 1978

Part of: JPH 30th Anniversary Most Cited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Julian E. Zelizer
Julian E. Zelizer
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Albany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Policy history has straddled two disciplines—history and policy analysis—neither of which has taken it very seriously. What unites those who study policy history is not that they are ”policy historians“ per se, but that they organize their analysis and narrative around the emergence, passage, and implementation of policy. Rather than a subfield, as the historian Paula Baker recently argued, policy history has resembled area studies programs. Policy history became an interdisciplinary arena for scholars from many different fields to interact. While founders hoped that policies would become an end in themselves, rather than something used to understand other issues, scholarship since 1978 has shown that the two are not mutually exclusive. In fact, some of the most innovative scholarship has come from social or political historians who have used policy to understand larger historical phenomena. In the process, the work provided a much richer understanding of how policymaking evolved.

Type
Critical Perspectives
Information
Journal of Policy History , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , July 2000 , pp. 369 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. 2000

References

Notes

1. For an another insightful history of policy history, see Graham, Hugh Davis, “The Stunted Career of Policy History: A Critique and an Agenda,” The Public Historian 15 (1993): 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar My work focuses much more on the professional and intellectual history of what policy historians have written since the 1970s. I would like to thank Edward Berkowitz, Donald Critchlow, Michael Grossberg, Richard Hamm, Michael Katz, Morton Keller, Eric Patashnik, Beryl Radin, and Nora Zelizer for their suggestions. I would especially like to thank Ellis Hawley for sharing his valuable documents with me.

2. Baker, Paula, “Remarks at a Roundtable Discussion on the State of Policy History And Its Future,”27 May 1999,paper presented at the 1999 Policy History Conference,Clayton, Missouri.Google Scholar

3. Berkowitz, Edward D., “The Historian as Policy Analyst: The Challenge of HEW,” The Public Historian 1 (1979): 17–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

4. For examples of articles that speak to the concerns of the historical profession, see Gillon, Steven M., “The Future of Political History,” Journal of Policy History 9 (1997): 240–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Silbey, Joel H., “The State of American Political History at the Millennium: The Nineteenth Century as a Test Case,” Journal of Policy History 11 (1999): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Schlesinger, Arthur M. Jr., The Age of Roosevelt: The Coming of the New Deal (Boston, 1959)Google Scholar; Leuchtenburg, William M., Franklin Roosevelt and the New Deal (New York, 1963)Google Scholar; Hofstadter, Richard, The Age of Reform: From Bryan to F.D.R. (New York, 1955).Google Scholar

6. Some of the landmark books that dealt with economic regulation in the Progressive and New Deal eras include Kolko, Gabriel, The Triumph of Conservatism (Glencoe, 1963)Google Scholar; Weinstein, James, The Corporate Ideal in the Liberal State (Boston, 1966)Google Scholar. To be sure, there were moderates who studied the relationship between business and economic policy. For one of the best works in this period, see Hawley, Ellis, The New Deal and the Problem of Monopoly (Princeton, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. See, for examples, Lubove, Roy, The Professional Altruist: The Emergence of Social Work as a Career, 1880–1930 (Cambridge, Mass., 1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Katz, Michael B., The Irony of Early School Reform: Educational Innovation in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Massachusetts (Cambridge, Mass., 1968).Google Scholar

8. Leff, Mark H., “Revisioning U.S. Political History,” The American Historical Review 100 (1995): 829–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Hays, Samuel P., “The Social Analysis of American Political History,” Political Science Quarterly 80 (1965): 373–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kleppner, Paul, The Cross of Culture: A Social Analysis of Midwestern Politics (New York, 1970)Google Scholar; Silbey, Joel H., Bogue, Allan G., and Flanigan, William H., eds., The History of American Electoral Behavior (Princeton, 1978).Google Scholar

10. Higham, John, History: Professional Scholarship in America (Baltimore, 1989), 68–86Google Scholar. See also Cooling, Benjamin Franklin, “History Programs in the Department of Defense,” The Public Historian 12 (1990): 43–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Trask, Roger R., “Small Federal History Offices in the Nation's Capital,” The Public Historian 13 (1991): 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11. Hewlett, Richard G., “The Practice of History in the Federal Government,” The Public Historian 1 (1978): 30–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12. Mooney-Melvin, Patricia, “Professional Historians and ‘Destiny's Gate,’” The Public Historian 17 (1995): 14–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13. Kelley, Robert, “Public History: Its Origins, Nature, and Prospects,” The Public Historian 1 (1978): 24–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14. Cited in Hamerow, Theodore S., Reflections on History and Historians (Madison, 1987), 8.Google Scholar

15. “Editor's Preface,” The Public Historian 1 (1978): 5.Google Scholar

16. Novick, Peter, That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession (Cambridge, 1988), 512–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17. Both quotations cited in Novick, That Noble Dream, 516–517.

18. See, for example, Rothman, David, The Discovery of the Asylum: Social Order and Disorder in the Early Republic (Boston, 1971)Google Scholar, and Boyer, Paul, Urban Masses and Moral Order in America, 1820–1920 (Cambridge, 1978)Google Scholar. Much of the scholarship on social control was influenced by Frances Fox Piven and Cloward, Richard A., Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare (New York, 1971).Google Scholar

19. Galambos, Louis, “The Emerging Organizational Synthesis in Modern American History,” Business History Review 44 (1970): 279–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, “Technology, Political Economy, and Professionalization,” Business History Review 57 (1983): 471–93.

20. Correspondence from Morton Keller, 26 August 1999.

21. Hawley, Ellis, “Remarks at a Roundtable Discussion on the State of Policy History And Its Future,”27 May 1999,paper presented at the 1999 Policy History Conference.Google Scholar

22. Morton Keller and Tom McGraw to Ellis Hawley, 13 July 1978, Hawley Papers.

23. Grossberg, Michael, “A Report of the Conference on the History of American Public Policy,” The Public Historian 1 (1979): 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24. Ibid., 25.

25. Graham, “The Stunted Career of Policy History,” 18.

26. Smith, James A., The Idea Brokers: Think Tanks and the Rise of the New Policy Elite (New York, 1991).Google Scholar

27. Home Page of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, http://qsilver.quensu.ca/appam/information.

28. Joseph Badaracco, “Report of the Conference on the History of American Public Policy,” 2–3 November 1979, and Morton Keller and Thomas McGraw to Ellis Hawley, 23 June 1980.

29. See, for example, Grable, Stephen W., “Applying Urban History to City Planning: A Case Study in Atlanta,” The Public Historian 1 (1979): 45–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stearns, Peter N., “History and Policy Analysis: Toward Maturity,” The Public Historian 4 (1982): 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30. See, for example, W. Andrew Achenbaum, “American Medical History: Social History and Medical History,” and Fox, Daniel, “History and Health Policy,” in The Journal of Social History 18 (1985): 343–364CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Reed, James, “Public Policy On Human Reproduction and the Historian,” The Journal of Social History 18 (1985): 383–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

31. Rothman, David J. and Wheeler, Stanton, eds., Social History and Social Policy (New York, 1981).Google Scholar

32. Herbert G. Gutman, “Mirrors of Hard, Distorted Glass: An Examination of Some Influential Historical Assumptions About the Afro-American Family and the Shaping of Public Policies, 1861–1965,” in Social History and Social Policy, 239–273.

33. Keller, Morton, Affairs of State: Public Life in Late Nineteenth-Century America (Cambridge, Mass., 1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Berkowitz, Edward and McQuaid, Kim, Creating the Welfare State: The Political Economy of Twentieth-Century Reform (New York, 1980)Google Scholar; Graebner, William, A History of Retirement: The Meaning and Function of an American Institution, 1885–1978 (New Haven, 1980)Google Scholar; Patterson, James T., America's Struggle Against Poverty, 1900–1980 (Cambridge, Mass., 1981)Google Scholar; Achenbaum, W. Andrew, Shades of Gray: Old Age, American Values, and Federal Policing Since 1920 (Boston, 1983)Google Scholar; Katz, Michael B., In The Shadow of the Poorhouse: A Social History of Welfare in America (New York, 1986).Google Scholar

34. McCraw, Thomas K., Prophets of Regulation: Charles Francis Adams, Louis D. Brandeis, James M. Landis, and Alfred E. Kahn (Cambridge, Mass., 1984).Google Scholar

35. May, Ernest R., “Lessons” of the Past: The Use and Misuse of History in American Policy (New York, 1973).Google Scholar

36. Neustadt, Richard E. and May, Ernest R., Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision Makers (New York, 1986), 275–284.Google Scholar

37. Robert, B. and Stevens, Rosemary, Welfare Medicine in America: A Case Study of Medicaid (New York, 1974)Google Scholar; Steiner, Gilbert, The Children's Cause (Washington, D.C., 1976)Google Scholar, Aaron, Henry, Politics and the Professors: The Great Society in Perspective (Washington, D.C., 1978)Google Scholar, and Derthick, Martha, Policymaking for Social Security (Washington, D.C., 1979)Google Scholar; Derthick, and Quirk, Paul J., The Politics of Deregulation (Washington, D.C., 1985).Google Scholar

38. Novick, That Noble Dream, 522–72.

39. Donald Critchlow to Ellis Hawley, 9 January 1984, and Donald Critchlow to Ellis Hawley, 1 February 1984, Hawley Papers.

40. Ibid.

41. Critchlow, Donald T. and Hawley, Ellis W., Federal Social Policy: The Historical Dimension (University Park, Pa., 1988).Google Scholar

42. Ibid, 6.

43. Critchlow, Donald T. and Hawley, Ellis W., eds., Poverty and Public Policy in Modern America (Chicago, 1989).Google Scholar

44. Abbot, Andrew, The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor (Chicago, 1988).Google Scholar

45. Mock, David B., “History in the Public Arena,” in Public History: An Introduction, eds. Howe, Barbara J. and Kemp, Emory (Malabar, Fla., 1986).Google Scholar

46. Berkowitz, Edward, “History, Public Policy, and Reality,” The Journal of Social History 18 (1984): 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

47. Neustadt and May, Thinking in Time.

48. Ibid., xxii.

49. Hugh Graham later echoed this proposal by claiming that historians were able to understand the “institutions that drive the policy process—their personality and culture, their values and memory, the legacy of their leaders.” Graham, Hugh Davis, “The Stunted Career of Policy History: A Critique and an Agenda,” Public Historian 15 (1993): 35–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

50. Wyszomirski, Margaret Jane, “Book Review: Thinking in Time,” The Journal of Politics 49 (1987): 607.Google Scholar

51. Achenbaum, W. Andrew, “Public History's Past, Present, and Prospects,” The American Historical Review 92 (1987): 1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

52. Donald Critchlow to Ellis Hawley, 20 February 1987, Hawley Papers. Arnold stepped down in 1990 because of his responsibilities to the Department of Political Science, leaving Critchlow as the only editor. Critchlow moved to Saint Louis University in 1991.

53. Skowronek, Stephen, Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920 (Cambridge, 1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Skocpol, Theda, and Evans, Peter, Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge, 1985).Google Scholar

54. Leff, “Revisioning U.S. Political History,” 849.

55. One exemplary publication comes from Sarah Binder. Her recent publication draws on a wealth of historical data to argue that partisan interests in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries were the primary factors shaping parliamentary rules for minority rights in Congress. Her work demonstrates clearly how majorities must grapple with rules inherited from the past. Binder, Sarah, Minority Rights, Majority Rules: Partisanship and the Development of Congress (Cambridge, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

56. Hawley, Ellis W., “Remarks at a Roundtable Discussion,”27 May 1999,paper presented to the 1999 Policy History Conference,Clayton, Missouri.Google Scholar

57. There were exceptions to this trend, which are discussed in the next section of this article.

58. Shartlet, Jeff, “Why Diplomatic Historians May Be the Victims of American Triumphalism,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, 24 09 1999.Google Scholar

59. For a wonderful overview of the public history movement, see the special issue of their journal, The Public Historian 21 (1999).Google Scholar

60. Graham, Otis L. Jr., “The Organization of American Historians and Public History—A Progress,” The Public Historian 18 (1996): 7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

61. American Historical Association, Perspectives 37 (1999): 59.Google ScholarPubMed

62. Mooney-Melvin, Patricia, “Professional Historians and ‘Destiny's Gate,’” The Public Historian 17 (1995): 21–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

63. Miller, Page Putnam, “Reflections on the Public History Movement,” The Public Historian 14 (1992): 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

64. Posner, Richard A., An Affair of State: The Investigation, Impeachment, and Trial of President Clinton (Cambridge, Mass., 1999), 230–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

65. Cited in Graham, Otis L., “Editor's Corner,” The Public Historian 15 (1993): 12Google Scholar. For the excellent book that emerged, see Graham, Otis L., Losing Time: The Industrial Policy Debate (Cambridge, Mass., 1992).Google Scholar

66. One notable example is Katz, Michael B., The “Underclass” Debate Views from History (Princeton, 1993).Google Scholar

67. Graham, Hugh Davis, “The Stunted Career of Policy History: A Critique and an Agenda,” The Public Historian 15 (1993): 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

68. “JPH Editor's Note,” Journal of Policy History 3 (1991): 350.Google Scholar

69. Achenbaum, W. Andrew, “Politics, Power, and Problems: Perspectives on Writing Policy History,” Journal of Policy History 1 (1989): 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

70. Katz, Michael B., The Undeserving Poor: From Poverty to the War on Welfare (New York, 1989).Google Scholar

71. Steinmo, Sven, Taxation and Democracy: Swedish, British, and American Approaches to Financing the Modern State (New Haven, 1993).Google Scholar

72. Gordon, Linda, Pitied But Not Entitled: Single Mothers and the History of Welfare (New York, 1994), 306.Google Scholar See also Kessler-Harris, Alice, “Designing Women and Old Fools: The Construction of the Social Security Amendments of 1939,” in U.S. History as Women's History: New Feminist Essays, eds. Kerber, Linda, Kessler-Harris, Alice, and Sklar, Kathryn Kish (Chapel Hill, 1995), 87–106Google Scholar; Boris, Eileen, Home to Work: Motherhood and the Politics of Industrial Homework in the United States (Cambridge, 1994)Google Scholar; Fraser, Nancy and Gordon, Linda, “‘Dependency’ Demystified: Inscriptions of Power in a Keyword of the Welfare State,” Social Politics 1 (1994): 4–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Muncy, Robyn, “Gender and Professionalization in the Origins of the U.S. Welfare State: The Careers of Sophonisba Breckinridge and Edith Abbott, 1890–1935,” Journal of Policy History 2 (1990): 290–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar For a nuanced and innovative analysis of this issue, see Mettler, Suzanne, “The Stratification of Social Citizenship: Gender and Federalism in the Formation of Old Age Insurance and Aid to Dependent Children,” Journal of Policy History 11 (1999): 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

73. Lieberman, Robert C., Shifting the Color Line: Race and the American Welfare State (Cambridge, Mass., 1998)Google Scholar; Quadagno, Jill, The Color of Welfare: How Racism Undermined the War on Poverty (New York, 1994)Google Scholar. For a pointed critique of this type of policy analysis, see Davies, Gareth and Derthick, Martha, “Race and Social Welfare Policy: The Social Security Act of 1935,” Political Science Quarterly 112 (1997): 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

74. Skocpol, Theda, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers (Cambridge, Mass., 1992), 539.Google Scholar See also Ladd-Taylor, Molly, Mother Work: Women, Child Welfare, and the State 1890–1930 (Urbana, Ill., 1994).Google Scholar

75. Bix, Amy Sue, “Diseases Chasing Money and Power: Breast Cancer and AIDS Activism Challenging Authority,” Journal of Policy History 9 (1997): 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also Turner, William B., “Lesbian/Gay Rights and Immigration Policy: Lobbying to End the Medical Model,” Journal of Policy History 7 (1995): 208–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

76. Berkowitz, Edward, Mr. Social Security: The Life of Wilbur Cohen (Lawrence, Kan., 1995).Google Scholar

77. See, for example, Lee, Frederic S., “From Multi-Industry Planning to Keynesian Planning: Gardiner Means, the American Keynesians, and National Economic Planning at the National Resources Committee,” Journal of Policy History 2 (1990): 186–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Skerry, Peter, “The Ambivalent Minority: Mexican Americans and the Voting Rights Act,” Journal of Policy History 6 (1994): 73–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zelizer, Julian E., “‘Where Is the Money Coming From?’ The Reconstruction of Social Security Finance, 1939–1950,” Journal of Policy History 9 (1997): 399–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jacobs, Meg, “The Politics of Purchasing Power: State-Building, Political Economy, and Consumption Politics, 1909–1959” (Ph.D. diss., University of Virginia, 1999)Google Scholar; Brinkley, Alan, The End of Reform: New Deal Liberalism in Recession and War (New York, 1995)Google Scholar; Weir, Margaret, Politics and Jobs: The Boundaries of Employment Policy in the United States (Princeton, 1992).Google Scholar

78. Graham, Hugh Davis, “Race, History, and Policy: African Americans and Civil Rights Since 1964,” Journal of Policy History 6 (1994): 12–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Graham, , The Civil Rights Era: Origins and Development of National Policy, 1960–1972 (New York, 1990).Google Scholar Gareth Davies showed how Lyndon Johnson's initial campaign against poverty framed its programs within popular American ideals of individualism and self-sufficiency. The book traces why these efforts were abandoned by the 1970s, but also hints that those older programs offered a vision of federal assistance that might have been more successful politically. See Davies, Gareth, From Opportunity to Entitlement: The Transformation and Decline of Great Society Liberalism (Lawrence, Kan., 1996).Google Scholar

79. Graham, Hugh Davis, “Legacies of the 1960s: The American ‘Rights Revolution’ in an Era of Divided Governance,” Journal of Policy History 10 (1998): 284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

80. Derthick, Martha, “Crossing Thresholds: Federalism in the 1960s,” Journal of Policy History 8 (1996): 64–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

81. Silverberg, Helene, “State Building, Health Policy, and the Persistence of the American Abortion Debate,” Journal of Policy History 9 (1997): 311–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar For another insightful example of international comparison to understand alternatives, see Davies, Gareth, “Understanding the War on Poverty: The Advantages of a Canadian Perspective,” Journal of Policy History 9 (1997): 425–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

82. Eckes, Alfred E., “Revisiting Smoot-Hawley,” Journal of Policy History 7 (1995): 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

83. Flamm, Michael W., “Price Controls, Politics, and the Perils of Policy by Analogy: Economic Demobilization After World War II,” Journal of Policy History 8 (1996): 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

84. Sugrue, Thomas J., The Origins of the Urban Crisis: Race and Inequality in Postwar Detroit (Princeton, 1996).Google Scholar

85. Beito, David T., “Mutual Aid, State Welfare, and Organized Charity: Fraternal Societies and the ‘Deserving’ and ‘Undeserving’ Poor, 1900–1930,” Journal of Policy History 5 (1993): 419–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

86. Howard, Christopher, The Hidden Welfare State: Tax Expenditures and Social Policy in the United States (Princeton, 1997).Google Scholar

87. Amenta, Edwin, Bold Relief: Institutional Politics and the Origins of Modern American Social Policy (Princeton, 1998).Google Scholar

88. Minchin, Timothy J., “Federal Policy and the Racial Integration of Southern Industry, 1961–1980,” Journal of Policy History 11 (1999): 347–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

89. Freeman, Jo, “The Political Culture of the Democratic and Republican Parties,” Political Science Quarterly 101 (1986): 327–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

90. For examples, see the following articles: Mucciaroni, Gary, “Political Learning and Economic Policy Innovation: The United States and Sweden in the Post–World War II Era,” Journal of Policy History 1 (1989): 391–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Childs, William R., “Origins of the Texas Railroad Commission's Power to Control Production of Petroleum: Regulatory Strategies in the 1920s,” Journal of Policy History 2 (1990): 353–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kinder, Douglas Clark, “Shutting Out the Evil: Nativism and Narcotics Control in the United States,” Journal of Policy History 3 (1991): 468–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Abbott, Carl, “Five Downtown Strategies: Policy Discourse and Downtown Planning,” Journal of Policy History 5 (1993): 5–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Eisner, Marc Allen, “Discovering Patterns in Regulatory History: Continuity, Change, and Regulatory Regimes,” Journal of Policy History 6 (1994): 157–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lasar, Matthew, “The Triumph of the Visual: Stages and Cycles in the Pornography Controversy from the McCarthy Era to the Present,” Journal of Policy History 7 (1995): 181–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Scott, Daryl Michael, “The Politics of Pathology: The Ideological Origins of the Moynihan Controversy,” Journal of Policy History 8 (1996): 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

91. Kelley, Robert, Battling The Inland Sea: Floods, Public Policy, and the Sacramento Valley, 2d ed. (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1998), 319–324.Google Scholar See also Kelley, , “The Interplay of American Political Culture and Public Policy: The Sacramento River as a Case Study,” Journal of Policy History 1 (1989): 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Webber, Carolyn and Wildavsky, Aaron, A History of Taxation and Expenditure in the Western World (New York, 1986)Google Scholar, and Dobbin, Frank, Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age (Cambridge, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar In my own book, I tried to show how political culture influenced Representative Wilbur Mills, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, and the tax policy community between the 1940s and 1970s. See Zelizer, Julian E., Taxing America: Wilbur D. Mills, Congress, and the State, 1945–1975 (Cambridge, 1998).Google Scholar

92. Hays, Samuel P., Beauty, Health, and Permanence: Environmental Politics in the United States, 1955–1985 (Cambridge, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

93. Critchlow, Donald T., Intended Consequences: Birth Control, Abortion, and the Federal Government in Modern America (New York, 1999).Google Scholar

94. Eisner, Marc Allen, “Institutional History and Policy Change: Exploring the Origins of the New Antitrust,” Journal of Policy History 2 (1990): 261–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

95. Keller, Affairs of State. In his more recent work, Keller continued to pursue these themes. See, for example, Keller, , Regulating a New Economy: Public Policy and Economic Change in America, 1900–1933 (Cambridge, Mass., 1990).Google Scholar

96. Balogh, Brian, Chain Reaction: Expert Debate and Public Participation in American Commercial Nuclear Power, 1945–1975 (Cambridge, 1991), 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

97. Haynes, John Earl, “Applied History or Propaganda? The Influence of History on Farm Credit Legislation in Minnesota,” The Public Historian 10 (1988): 32–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar