No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 April 2009
Normally we do not think of living organisms as machines or as relays in complex, tightly coupled technological systems. Nonetheless, in recent years this is precisely the manner in which many environmental historians have come to approach the study of certain organisms and their natural or anthropogenic environments. Over the millennia and across the globe, humans have so manipulated certain organisms that they have come to exist solely as parts of technological systems or industrialized chains of production and consumption. Technological artifacts are, of course, only nature refashioned: nonetheless, modern industrialized societies tend to view themselves as gradually distancing themselves from, replacing, or, in some instances, even killing nature with their advanced technologies and gadgetries, when actually they are only refashioning their inseparable relationship to it.
1. This subfield of environmental history is often called “envirotech.” As the name suggests, it bridges scholarship in the history of technology and environmental history. See LeCain, Timothy, “What Is Envirotech? Some Emergent Properties of a New Historical Subfield,” The Envirotech Newsletter 5 (2005): 1, 4–5.Google Scholar
2. The intriguing argument that human enterprises, such as industry, science, and technology, have so transformed nature that the planet no longer exists in its previously recognizable form, whatever that might have been for people, is articulated nicely in McKibben, Bill, The End of Nature (New York, 1997).Google Scholar
3. See chapter one of my The Lost Wolves of Japan, foreword by William Cronon (Seattle, 2005). In many respects, the morphological development of the Japanese wolf, C.l. hodophilax, and hence its taxonomic designation, was the product of anthropogenic environmental forces in Japan's early modern and modern histories.
4. Russell, Edmund, “Evolutionary History: Prospectus for a New Field,” Environmental History 8 (04 2003): 205–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. On the “big chicken” industry in the United States, see Striffler, Steve, Chicken: The Dangerous Transformation of America's Favorite Food (New Haven, 2005).Google Scholar
6. Pollan, Michael has discussed the theme of “co-evolution” in relationship to certain desirable plants in The Botany of Desire: A Plant's-Eye View of the World (New York, 2002).Google Scholar
7. Russell, Edmund, “Introduction: The Garden in the Machine: Toward an Evolutionary History of Technology,” in Industrializing Organisms: Introducing Evolutionary History, ed. Schrepfer, Susan R. and Scranton, Philip, Hagley Perspectives on Business and Culture, vol. 5 (New York, 2004), 1, 4, 8, 11, 13.Google Scholar
8. Daniel, Pete, Toxic Drift: Pesticides and Health in the Post-World War II South (Baton Rouge, 2005).Google Scholar
9. Buhs, Joshua Blu, The Fire Ant Wars: Nature, Science, and Public Policy in Twentieth-Century America (Chicago, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Weiner, Jonathan explores some insect resistances in The Beak of the Finch (New York, 1994), 253–255.Google Scholar
11. Fitzgerald, Deborah Kay, Every Farm a Factory: The Industrial Ideal in American Agriculture (New Haven, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. For an excellent treatment of forms of biomagnification, see Steingraber, Sandra, Having Faith: An Ecologist's Journey to Motherhood (Cambridge, 2001).Google Scholar
13. Perrow, Charles, Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies (New York, 1984; repr., Princeton, 1999), 14, 233, 295, 296.Google Scholar
14. On social networks, see Padgett, John F. and Ansell, Christopher K., “Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434,” American Journal of Sociology 98, no. 6 (05 1993): 1259–1265Google Scholar. As for ecosystems, the British plant ecologist Arthur Tansley coined the term “ecosystem” in 1935. He wrote that “the whole system (in the sense of physics) including not only the organism-complex, but also the whole complex of physical factors forming what we call the environment of the biome—the habitat factors in the widest sense.” See McIntosh, Robert P., The Background of Ecology: Concepts and Theory (Cambridge, 1985), 193.Google Scholar
15. Goldsmith, Marian R., Shimada, Toru, and Abe, Hiroaki, “The Genetics and Genomics of the Silkworm, Bombyx mori,” Annual Review of Entomology 50 (01 2005): 71–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. A standard treatment of Heian Japanese aesthetics and cultural sensibilities is Morris, Ivan, The World of the Shining Prince: Court Life in Ancient Japan (New York, 1964).Google Scholar
17. Goldsmith, Shimada, and Abe, “The Genetics and Genomics of the Silkworm,” 71–100.
18. Masaaki, Kasai, Mushi to Nihon bunka (Insects and Japanese culture) (Tokyo, 1997), 72–73.Google Scholar
19. Kojiki (Record of Ancient Matters), translated with an introduction and notes by Donald L. Philippi (Tokyo, 1968), 87.
20. Ibid., 313.
21. Walker, Brett L., “Commercial Growth and Environmental Change in Early Modern Japan: Hachinohe's Wild Boar Famine of 1749,” Journal of Asian Studies 60, no. 2 (Spring 2001): 329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Partner, Simon, Toshié: A Story of Village Life in Twentieth-Century Japan (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 2004), 17–20.Google Scholar
23. An excellent treatment of early modern Japanese rural lending institutions is Toby, Ronald P., “Both a Borrower and a Lender Be: From Village Moneylender to Rural Banker in the Tempô Era,” Monumenta Nipponica 46, no. 4 (Winter 1991): 483–512Google Scholar. In the context of Japan's “household system,” it fell on the shoulders of peasant women such as Matsuo Taseko to care for silkworms and thereby elevate the wealth of their husbands' households. See Walthall, Anne, The Weak Body of a Useless Woman: Matsuo Taseko and the Meiji Restoration (Chicago, 1998).Google Scholar
24. For example, Lady Nijo lamented the death of her lover, the emperor, with a poem that referred to the seasonal (and hence representative of transient) calls of insects and deer. See The Confessions of Lady Nijo, trans. Brazell, Karen (Stanford, 1973).Google Scholar
25. Lurie, David B., “Orientomology: The Insect Literature of Lafcadio Hearn (1850–1904),” in JAPANimals: History and Culture in Japan's Animal Life, ed. Pflugfelder, Gregory M. and Walker, Brett L. (Ann Arbor, 2005), 245–262.Google Scholar
26. Hearn, Lafcadio, Kwaidan: Stories and Studies of Strange Things (Boston, 1904; repr., Rutland, Vt., 1971), 184, 207–12.Google Scholar
27. In 1900, Japanese built 1,396 slaughterhouses throughout their country. At these slaughterhouses, between 1893 and 1902, employees dispatched over 1.7 million cattle to fuel the workers and soldiers of modern Japan. Pigs were an important industrialized organism as well. See The Department of Agriculture and Commerce, ed. Japan in the Beginning of the 20th Century (Tokyo, 1904), 184–200.Google ScholarPubMed
28. “The Livestock Industry of Japan,” Report Number 30, General Headquarters, Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers, Natural Resources Section, APO 500, 18 April 1944.
29. Dower, John W., Embracing Defeat: Japan in the Wake of World War II (New York, 1999), 133.Google Scholar
30. Barenblatt, Daniel, A Plague upon Humanity: The Hidden History of Japan's Biological Warfare Program (New York, 2004), 9–10.Google Scholar
31. “Japanese Use the Chinese as ‘Guinea Pigs’ to Test Germ Warfare,” Rocky Mountain Medical Journal 39, no. 8 (08 1942): 571–572Google Scholar; Materials on the Trial of Former Servicemen of the Japanese Army Charged with Manufacturing and Employing Bacteriological Weapons (Moscow, 1950)Google Scholar; Powell, John W., “A Hidden Chapter in History,” The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 37, no. 8 (10 1981): 49–50.Google Scholar
32. Russell, Edmund P., “‘Speaking of Annihilation’: Mobilization for War Against Human and Insect Enemies, 1914–1945,” Journal of American History 82, no. 4 (03 1996): 1505–1506, 1508, 1511, 1522–27Google Scholar. On the dehumanization of the enemy, both in the United States and Japan, see Dower, John W., War Without Mercy: Race and Power in the Pacific War (New York, 1986).Google Scholar
33. Buddhist beliefs provide one reason why Japanese cultivators believed that talismans from shrines such as Mt. Zozu's Konpira, on Shikoku Island, prevented serious insect damage. See Thal, Sarah, Rearranging the Landscape of the Gods: The Politics of a Pilgrimage Site in Japan, 1573–1912 (Chicago, 2005), 106–107.Google Scholar
34. Mun, J. H., Song, Y. H., Heong, K. L., and Roderick, G. K., “Genetic Variation among Asian Populations of Rice Planthoppers, Nilaparvata lugens and Sogatella furcifera (Hemiptera: Delphacidae): Mitochondrial DNA Sequences,” Bulletin of Entomological Research 89 (1999): 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. In what is called the kokudaka system, the Tokugawa regime measured the wealth of feudal domains and their retainers according to an amount called koku, wherein one koku equaled 5.1 bushels of rice. The philosophy behind this amount was that one koku of rice could feed a human for one year.
36. The Ten Foot Square Hut and Tales of the Heike, trans. Sadler, A. L. (Sydney, 1928), 123–124.Google Scholar
37. Borgen, Robert, Suguwara no Michizane and the Early Heian Court (Honolulu, 1986), 278–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. For more on whaling in Japan, see Kalland, Arne and Moeran, Brian, Japanese Whaling: End of an Era? (London, 1992)Google Scholar. See also Kalland, Arne, Fishing Villages in Tokugawa Japan (Honolulu, 1995).Google Scholar
39. Isao, Kikuchi, Kinsei no kikin (Early modern Japan's famines) (Tokyo, 1997), 82–89.Google Scholar
40. Totman, Conrad, Early Modern Japan (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1993), 236–238.Google Scholar
41. Once again, these two terms refer to Japanese imperial reign names. The Tenmei period lasted from 1781 to 1788; the Tenpo period lasted from 1830 to 1843.
42. The need to get more productivity out of rural lands with fewer laborers also led to the development of nitrogenous fertilizers. See Molony, Barbara, Technology and Investment: The Prewar Japanese Chemical Industry (Cambridge, Mass., 1990), 17–266Google Scholar. For more recent data on fertilizer use, see Vogel, David, “Consumer Protection and Protectionism in Japan,” Journal of Japanese Studies 18, no. 1 (Winter 1992): 131–132.Google Scholar
43. The Meiji Japanese adoption and adaptation of Euro-American science is covered in Bartholomew, James R., The Formation of Science in Japan (New Haven, 1989).Google Scholar
44. On the role of foreign experts in refashioning Hokkaido and agricultural practices there, see Hokkaido Prefectural Government, ed. Foreign Pioneers: A Short History of the Contribution of Foreigners to the Development of Hokkaido (Sapporo, 1968)Google Scholar. See also Fujita, Fumiko, American Pioneers and the Japanese Frontier: American Experts in Nineteenth-Century Japan (Westport, Conn., 1994)Google Scholar; Maki, John M., William Smith Clark: A Yankee in Hokkaido (Sapporo, 1996).Google Scholar
45. Whorton, James, Before Silent Spring: Pesticides and Public Health in Pre-DDT America (Princeton, 1974), 8–9, 12, 15–16, 20, 22, 64–65.Google Scholar
46. Shoichi, Matsunaka, Nihon ni okeru noyaku no rekishi (Japan's agricultural chemical history) (Tokyo, 2002), 9–11Google Scholar. For more specific information on plant disease, insects, and insecticides from the Meiji period through the 1950s, see Henshubu, Tennensha Jiten, ed. Byochu noyaku jiten (Dictionary of agricultural chemicals for disease and insects) (Tokyo, 1955).Google Scholar
47. Historian Irokawa Daikichi famously discovered a draft, nineteenth-century constitution, written by commoners, tucked in the attic of a rural farmhouse. The writings of Jefferson and Rousseau inspired much of the unofficial document. See Irokawa, Daikichi, The Culture of the Meiji Period, trans. Jansen, Marius (Princeton, 1988)Google Scholar. Nonetheless, Ito Hirobumi and his advisers, when drafting the official Meiji Constitution of 1889, relied mostly on Prussian monarchical theories. See Gluck, Carol, Japan's Modern Myths: Ideology in the Late Meiji Period (Princeton, 1985).Google Scholar
48. Elton, Charles S., The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants (London, 1958; repr., Chicago, 2000), 52–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49. Aldrin and dieldrin are closely related chemicals that fall under the cyclodiene classification of chlorinated hydrocarbons. Once sprayed in the environment, both chemicals bioconcentrate and biomagnify in a manner that kills or inhibits the reproductive success of many nonhuman species, especially in avian species.
50. Quammen, David, Monster of God: The Man-eating Predator in the Jungles of History and the Mind (New York, 2003), 426–427.Google Scholar
51. Narisue, Tachibana, Kokon chomonju (Notable tales old and new), vol. 2, in Shincho Nihon koten shusei (Shincho collection of classical Japanese literature), vol. 76, ed. Koichi, Nishio and Yasuharu, Kobayashi (Tokyo, 1986), 372Google Scholar. For a description of this collection, see Dykstra, Yoshiko K., “Notable Tales Old and New: Tachibana Narisue's Kokon Chomonju,” Monumenta Nipponica 47, no. 4 (Winter 1992): 469–493.Google Scholar
52. Shikibu, Murasaki, The Tale of Genji, trans. and with intro. by Seidensticker, Edward G. (New York, 1997), 671.Google Scholar
53. Churyo manroku, cited in Kasai, Mushi to Nihon bunka, 132–33.
54. Morisada, Kitagawa, Ruiju kinsei fuzokushi (Record of various modern customs), ed. Iwao, Muromatsu (Tokyo, 1928), 167.Google Scholar
55. Clausen, Curtis P., King, J. L., and Teranishi, Cho, “The Parasites of Popillia Japonica in Japan and Chosen (Korea), and Their Introduction into the United States,” United States Department of Agriculture Department Bulletin 1429 (01 1927): 1–55.Google Scholar
56. See, for example, Yuji, Watanabe, Kurashi ni hisomu kagaku dokubutsu jiten (A Dictionary of chemical poisons that lurk in our daily lives) (Tokyo, 2002), 74Google Scholar; Gen, Nakaminami, Noyaku genron (The principles of agricultural chemicals) (Tokyo, 2001), 23–25Google Scholar; Yoshiaki, Miura, Kagaku osen to ningen no rekishi (Chemical contamination and human history) (Tokyo, 1999), 73–74Google Scholar; Akio, Yasuhara, Shinobi yoru kagaku busshitsu osen: Chikyu tanjo, seitaikei, gendai bunmei ni okeru kagaku busshitsu osen no keifu (Exposing chemical contamination: The birth of earth, ecological structure, and the genealogy of chemical contamination in the context of modern civilizatation) (Tokyo, 1999), 143–145Google Scholar; Mitsuru, Ando, Yokuwakaru noyaku osen: Jintai to kankyo o mushibamu gosei kagaku busshitsu (Agricultural chemical contamination: The synthetic chemical compounds that ruin human bodies and the environment) (Tokyo, 1990), 21–25.Google Scholar
57. Nash, Linda, “The Fruits of Ill-Health: Pesticides and Workers' Bodies in Post–World War II California,” Osiris 19 (2004): 205, 208Google Scholar. See also Nash, Linda, “Finishing Nature: Harmonizing Bodies and Environments in Late-Nineteenth-Century California,” Environmental History 8 (01 2003): 25–52.Google Scholar
58. Klaassen, Curtis D., ed. Casarett & Doull's Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons, 5th ed. (New York, 1996), 655.Google Scholar
59. Namba, Tatsuji, “Oxime Therapy for Poisoning by Alkylphosphate-Insecticides,”Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Congress on Occupational Health, July 25–29, 1960(1961):757.Google Scholar
60. Tanimura, Takashi, “Embryotoxicity of Acute Exposure to Methyl Parathion in Rats and Mice,” Archives of Environmental Health 15 (11 1967): 609–613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61. Namba, “Oxime Therapy for Poisoning by Alkylphosphate-Insecticides,” 757–58.
62. Shinsaku, Uemura, Hiroshi, Kawamura, Machiko, Tsuji, Shigeyuki, Tomita, and Shizuo, Maeda, Noyaku dokusei no jiten (Dictionary of toxic agricultural chemicals) (Tokyo, 2002), 146–147.Google Scholar
63. Markowitz, Gerald and Rosner, David, Deceit and Denial: The Deadly Politics of Industrial Pollution (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 2002).Google Scholar
64. Kenkyukai, Kankyo Horei, ed. Kankyo kogai nenkan (Yearbook of environmental public damage) (Tokyo, 1973), 137.Google Scholar
65. Koshi, Shimokawa, ed. Kankyoshi nenpyo: Showa-Heisei hen (Environmental history chronology: Showa and Heisei periods), vol. 2 (Tokyo, 2004), 193.Google Scholar
66. For some examples of the deadly consequences of parathion use, see Daniel, Toxic Drift, 108–24.
67. Kabushikigaisha, Sumitomo Kagaku Kogyo, ed. Sumitomo Kagaku Kogyo Kabushikigaisha shi (A history of Sumitomo Chemical) (Osaka, 1981), 305–309.Google Scholar
68. Klaassen, ed., Casarett & Doull's Toxicology, 673.
69. Takahashi, Yoshimoto, Hirasawa, Hideto, and Koyama, Keiko, “Restriction of Suicide Methods: A Japanese Perspective,” Archives of Suicide Research 4 (1998): 103–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
70. The fixation with mercury was in part due to the outbreak of “Minamata disease,” or methyl-mercury poisoning, in southern Japan. See Huddle, Norie and Reich, Michael with Stiskin, Nahum, Island of Dreams: Environmental Crisis in Japan, foreword by Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich and afterword by Ralph Nader (New York, 1975), 102–132Google Scholar; Upham, Frank K., Law and Social Change in Postwar Japan (Cambridge, Mass., 1989), 28–77Google Scholar; Ui, Jun, Industrial Pollution in Japan (Tokyo, 1992), 103–132Google Scholar; and George, Timothy S., Minamata: Pollution and the Struggle for Democracy in Postwar Japan (Cambridge, Mass., 2001)Google Scholar. On the pathology of “Minamata disease,” see Harada, Masazumi with Smith, Aileen M., “Minamata Disease: A Medical Report,” in Smith, W. Eugene and Smith, Aileen M., Minamata (New York, 1975), 180–192Google Scholar; Tsubaki, Tadao and Irukayama, Katsuro, ed. Minamata Disease: Methylmercury Poisoning in Minamata and Niigata, Japan (Tokyo and Amsterdam, 1977)Google Scholar; Takeuchi, Tadao and Eto, Komyo, The Pathology of Minamata Disease: A Tragic Story of Water Pollution (Fukuoka, 1999).Google Scholar
71. Sumitomo Kagaku Kogyo Kabushikigaisha, ed. Sumitomo Kagaku Kogyo Kabushikigaisha shi, 543–44.
72. Shimokawa, ed. Kankyoshi nenpyo: Showa-Heisei hen, 283.