Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:49:58.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermal effects on the dynamics of a two-gas gas-puff Ζ–θ pinch

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

M. H. Nasim
Affiliation:
Pakistan Atomic energy Commission, P.O. Box 1114, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
M. Salahuddin
Affiliation:
Pakistan Atomic energy Commission, P.O. Box 1114, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
Arshad M. Mirza
Affiliation:
Pakistan Atomic energy Commission, P.O. Box 1114, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan

Abstract

The imploding plasma column of a gas-puff Ζ-pinch has been used to compress the target-gas-embedded axial magnetic field in the presence of plasma pressure. The dynamics of a two-gas gas-puff Ζ-θ pinch is studied with different forms of applied current profiles. We find that the inclusion of a kinetic pressure term introduces the usual β–term, which delays and reduces the maximum compression. On the other hand, for fixed β, compression at an earlier time can be achieved for a large density ratio of the test to the driver gas at the interface position. For the pressure-free case, our earlier results are completely recovered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Apruzese, J. P., Davis, J. M. & Whitney, K. G. 1982 J. Appl. Phys. 53, 4020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braginskii, S. I. 1958 Soviet Phys. JETP 6, 494.Google Scholar
Felber, F. S., Malley, M. M., Wessel, F. J., Matzen, M. K., Palmer, M. A., Spielman, R. B., Liberman, M. A. & Velikovich, A. L. 1988 a Phys. Fluids 31, 2053.Google Scholar
Felber, F. S., Wessel, F. J., Wild, N. C., Rahman, H. U., Fisher, A., Fowler, C. M., Liberman, M. A. & Velikovich, A. L. 1988b J. Appl. Phys. 64, 3831.Google Scholar
Finken, K. H. & Ackermann, U. 1983 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 16, 773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, M. G. 1960 Proc. Phys. Soc. Lond. 76, 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, M. G., Bailey, J., Baldock, P., Bell, A. R., Cittenden, J. P., Choi, P., Coppins, M., Culverwell, I. D., Dangor, A. E., Figura, E. S., McCall, G. & Rickard, G. J. 1989 Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research, Nice, 12–19 October 1988, vol. II, p. 565. International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Kadomtsev, B. B. 1966 Reviews of Plasma Physics (ed. Leonotovich, M. A.), vol. 2, p. 153. Consultants Bureau.Google Scholar
Mirza, A. M., Iqball, M., Khattak, N. A. D. & Murtaza, G. 1993 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 7, 1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahman, H. U., Ney, P., Wessel, F. J., Fisher, A. & Rostoker, N. 1989 Proceedings of AlP 2nd International Conference on Dense ζ-Pinches, Laguna Beach, California (ed. Davis, J. & Rostoker, N.), p. 351, AIP.Google Scholar
Rahman, H. U., Ney, P., Wessel, F. J. & Rostoker, N. 1994 Comments Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion. 15, 339.Google Scholar
Ratakhin, N. A., Sorokin, S. A. & Chaikovasky, S. A. 1988 Proceedings of 7th International Conference on High Power Particle Beams, vol. II, (eds. Bauer, Walter & Schmidt, Winfried), p. 1204. Kernforschungszentrum, Karlsruhe, Germany.Google Scholar
Salahuddin, M. & Nasim, M. H. 1994 Physica Scripta 49, 345.Google Scholar
Sethian, J. D., Robson, A. E., Gerber, K. A. & DeSilva, A. W. 1987 Phys. Lett. 59 A, 892.Google Scholar
Wessel, F. J., Felber, F. S., Wild, N. C., Rahman, H. U., Ruden, E. & Fisher, A. 1986a Appl. Phys. Leit. 48, 1119.Google Scholar
Wessel, F. J., Wild, N. C., Fisher, A., Rahman, H. U., Ross, A. & Felber, F. S. 1986 b Rev. Sci. Instrum. 57, 2247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar