Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:31:08.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Switched-on evolution due to a temporal electron charge drifting subthermally through a warm collisional plasma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

Lim Chee-Seng
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, National University of Singapore, Singapore 0511, Republic of Singapore

Abstract

An electron charge is suddenly switched on while drifting through a warm collisional plasma. It acts thereafter with an arbitrary time-dependence. The evolution of the plasma, initially at rest, is considered in two and three dimensions. A general solution is first established for drift-modified slow plasma modes and then employed in subthermal drift analysis. Its abrupt switch-on causes the electron charge to release, during subthermal drift, a fully symmetric thermal front Г which subsequently expands ahead of it into an undisturbed receding expanse. A transversely symmetric response develops inside Г. On switch-off, the drifting charge releases another thermal front Г0 which also precedes it but trails non-concentrically behind Г. Plasma response continues after switch-off. Response properties between Г and Г0 differ strikingly from those inside Г0. Applications are next considered, first in three dimensions, for a subthermal pulsating electron with a generally complex frequency ω. The prepermanent state response inside Г comprises an axisymmetric dominant component ø plus a spherically symmetric transient component øtr. ø acquires the frequency ω. øtr has amplitudes dependent on and wave crests independent of both frequency ω and drift; it suffers a fast (slow) ω–independent temporal attenuation in a collisional (collisionless) plasma. The geometrical drift wave structure of ø is closely examined for real ω and a collisionless plasma. Every energy surface associated with ø nucleates at the electron; from there, it evolves slower than a phase surface, which eventually ‘disappears’ past Г. The leading energy surface, which nucleated at switch-on, develops permanently inside Г; it serves as an energy front that seals off the energy sustaining ø since switch-on. Finally, the two-dimensional evolving drift field of an activated antenna line is computed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chambers, Ll. G. 1965 J. Fluid Mech. 22, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Ll. G. 1967 Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 15, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chee-Seng, L., Majumdar, S. R. & Westbrook, D. R. 1976 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 349, 205.Google Scholar
Chee-Seng, L. 1977 Quart. Appl. Math. 35, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chee-Seng, L. 1978 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 364, 181.Google Scholar
Chenevier, P., Dolique, J. M. & Perès, H. 1973 J. Plasma Phys. 10, 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, G. 1969 Phys. Fluids, 12, 2707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdélyi, A., Magnus, W., Oberhettinger, F. & Tricomi, F. G. 1954 Tables of Integral Transforms. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Fiala, V. 1970 IEEE Trans. AP-18, 834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiala, V. 1973 J. Plasma Phys. 10, 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiala, V. 1979 Czech. J. Phys. B 29, 589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebenstreit, H. & Suchy, K. 1978 Kleinheubacher Ber. 21, 135.Google Scholar
Hebenstreit, H. 1979 Z. Naturforsch. 34a, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, G. & Montgomery, D. 1967 Phys. Fluids, 10, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krall, N. A. & Trivelpiece, A. W. 1973 Principles of Plasma Physics. McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehl, H. H. 1974 Phys. Fluids, 17, 1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing, E. W., Lamont, A. & Fielding, P. J. 1971 J. Plasma Phys. 5, 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K. F. 1974 Phys. Fluids, 17, 1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1960 Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 252, 397.Google Scholar
Michel, E. 1976 J. Plasma Phys. 15, 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, D., Joyce, G. & Sugihara, R. 1968 Plasma Phys. 10, 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, P. M. & Feshbach, H. 1953 Methode of Theoretical Physics, vol. 1. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mourgues, G., Fijalkow, E. & Feix, M. R. 1980 Plasma Phys. 22, 367.Google Scholar
Stenflo, L., Yu, M. Y. & Shukla, P. K. 1973 Phys. Fluids, 16, 450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storey, L. R. O. & Thiel, J. 1978 Phys. Fluids, 21, 2325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storey, L. R. O., Thiel, J. & Boswell, R. W. 1980 Phys. Fluids, 23, 654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wait, J. R. 1964 Can. J. Phys. 42, 1760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C.-L., Joyce, G. & Nicholson, D. R. 1981 J. Plasma Phys. 25, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar