Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:26:23.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The structure of hydromagnetic shock waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

R. J. Bickerton ,
L. Lenamon  and
R V. W. Murphy
R. J. Bickerton
Affiliation:
Culham Laboratory, U.K.A.E.A., Abingdon, Berks., England
L. Lenamon
Affiliation:
Culham Laboratory, U.K.A.E.A., Abingdon, Berks., England
R V. W. Murphy
Affiliation:
Culham Laboratory, U.K.A.E.A., Abingdon, Berks., England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We discuss the structure of hydomagnetic shock waves of various types. The plasma is treated in the two fluid approximation and coffisional transport coefficients are used. This treatment should be valid in a collisional plasma subject to the usual caveat about the use of transport coefficients in situations where the density, temperature, etc., may change significantly over a mean free path. The approach may also have some validity for collisionless shocks if the dissipation mechanisms involve instabilities of sufficiently fine scale and high frequency that they can be described by effective transport coefficients.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , March 1971 , pp. 177 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. E. 1962 Magneto Hydrodynamic Shocks, M.I.T. Monograph.Google Scholar
Chapman, S. & Cowling, T. G. 1939 The Mathematical Theory of Non-Uniform Gaes. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geiger, W., Kaeppeler, M. J. & Magyet, B. 1962 Nuclear Fusion Supplement, Part 2, 403.Google Scholar
Germain, P. 1962 Rev. Mod. Phys. 32, 951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulikovskii, A. O. & Lyubimov, O. A. 1961 Appl. Math. Mech. 25, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, J. W. M., Hols, L. S., Parkinson, M. J. & Sheffield, J. 1965 Nature, Lond. 208, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, J. W. M., Godenbaum, O. E., Iiyosni, A., Hols, L. S. & Hardcastle, R. A. 1967 Nature 216, 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, J. W. M. et al. 1969 Contribution to Proceedings of Study Group on Collisionless Shocks, ESRO Report SP–51, pp. 97 and 207.Google Scholar
Robson, A. E. & Sheffleld, J. 1968 Third IAEA Symposium on Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear. Fusion Research Novosibirsk, Paper CN-24/A-6.Google Scholar
Sagdeev, R. Z. 1967 Proc. Symp. in. Applied Mathe. XVIII, 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, L. Jr, 1956 Phyics of Fully Ionised Gasee. Interacience.Google Scholar
Stringer, T. E. 1963 Plasma Phys. (J. N. E. Part C) 5, 89.Google Scholar
Woods, L. C. 1969 a On strong transverse magnetogasdynamic shock waves, Culham Report, CLM-R96.Google Scholar
Woods, L. C. 1969b Plasma Phys. 11, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar