Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:19:02.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stimulated Brillouin scattering of an electromagnetic wave in a magnetoactive dissipative multi-ion-species plasma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

M. Bose
M. Bose
Affiliation:
Centre for Energy Studies, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi 110016, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Stimulated Brillouin scattering of an electromagnetic wave is investigated analytically in a dissipative magnetized plasma in the presence of negative ions. With an increase in the number of negative ions (maintaining quasi-neutrality), it is found that the growth rate of ion-acoustic waves decreases very slowly up to 50% concentration (i.e. half of the total ionic contribution) of negative ions. Further increase in the number density of negative ions beyond 50% results in a sharp fall in growth rate.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , April 1995 , pp. 127 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexff, I., Jones, W. D. & Montgomery, D. 1967 Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldis, H. A. & Walsh, C. J. 1983 Proceedings of International Conference on Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research, vol. 1, p. 97. International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA-CN-41/B 1-1, Viena.Google Scholar
Chen, F. F. 1974 Laser Interaction and Related Phenomena (eds. Hora, H. and Schwartz, H. J.), vol. 3A, p. 291. Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, O. S. & Cro, B. H. 1988 Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion 30, 1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, B. D., White, R. B. & Semac, T. K. 1971 Phys. Fluids 14, 2388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Intrator, T., Hershkowitz, N. & Stern, R. 1983 Phys. Fluids 26, 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, K. M., Bose, M. & Guha, S. 1986 Plasma Phys. Conir. Fusion 26, 677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K. F. 1974 Phys. Fluids 17, 1220, 1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendillo, M. & Forbes, J. 1982 J. Geophys. Res. 87, 8273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, M., Itoh, M., Nakamura, Y. & Itoh, T. 1975 Phys. Fluids 18, 651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishikawa, K. 1968 J. Phys. Soc. Japan 24, 916, 1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ono, M., Porkolab, M. & Chang, R. P. H. 1980 Phys. Fluids 23, 1956.Google Scholar
Ott, E., McBride, J. B. & Orens, J. H. 1972 Phys. Fluids 16, 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satya, Y. S., Jain, K. M., Guha, S. & Bose, M. 1985 J. Plasma Phys. 34, 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperling, J. L. & Perkins, F. W. 1974 Phys. Fluids 17, 1857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, C. J., Villeneuve, D. M. & Baldis, H. A. 1984 Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar