Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-ksm4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T02:10:07.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Symmetric spectrum current drive due to finite radial drift effects

Part of: Focus on Fusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2018

Peter J. Catto
Peter J. Catto*
Affiliation:
Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The drift surfaces of minority heated ions differ from flux surfaces due to finite poloidal gyroradius effects. As the minority poloidal gyroradius approaches radial scale lengths in the plasma, the difference between drift and flux surfaces can modify the heating and lead to a symmetric spectrum minority counter-current being driven. In response, a corresponding overall net co-current of comparable size is driven. This beneficial symmetric spectrum current drive in a tokamak is due to the parallel velocity asymmetry in the drift departure from a flux surface. As this new source of driven current is a side effect of minority heating it comes without any additional economic cost to reactor power balance. The symmetric spectrum current driven for near Maxwellian minorities is evaluated by an adjoint method and found to be modest. However, minority heating typically results in strong non-Maxwellian features on minority distributions so it may be possible to drive a significantly larger co-current. A related evaluation is performed for alpha particles in a deuterium minority heated plasma with a tritium majority. The low density of the alphas tends to keep this driven symmetric spectrum current small, but at very high heating levels a significant co-current might be driven. Other mechanisms to drive co-current with a symmetric spectrum are discussed and estimated, including asymmetric electron drag and focusing of the applied minority heating radio frequency fields.

Keywords

fusion plasmaplasma flowsplasma heating
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 84 , Issue 6 , December 2018 , 905840602
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antonsen, T. M. Jr. & Chu, K. R. 1982 Radio frequency current generation by waves in toroidal geometry. Phys. Fluids 25, 1295–1296.Google Scholar
Brambilla, M. 1999 Numerical simulation of ion cyclotron waves in tokamak plasmas. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 41, 1–34.Google Scholar
Calvo, I. & Parra, F. I. 2012 Long-wavelength limit of gyrokinetics in a turbulent tokamak and its intrinsic ambipolarity. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 54, 115007.Google Scholar
Catto, P. J. 1978 Linearized gyrokinetics. Plasma Phys. 20, 719–722.Google Scholar
Catto, P. J., Lee, J.-P. & Ram, A. K. 2017 A quasilinear operator retaining magnetic drift effects in tokamak geometry. J. Plasma Phys. 83, 905830611.Google Scholar
Catto, P. J. & Myra, J. R. 1992 A quasilinear description for fast wave minority heating permitting off magnetic axis heating in a tokamak. Phys. Fluids B 4, 187–199.Google Scholar
Catto, P. J., Myra, J. R. & Russell, D. A. 1994 A quasilinear, Fokker–Planck description of fast wave minority heating permitting off-axis tangency interactions. Phys. Plasmas 1, 52–63.Google Scholar
Catto, P. J., Tang, W. M. & Baldwin, D. E. 1981 Generalized gyrokinetics. Plasma Phys. 23, 639–650.Google Scholar
Chapman, I. T., Graves, J. P., Lennholm, M., Faustin, J., Lerche, E., Johnson, T. & Tholerus, S. 2015 The merits of ion cyclotron resonance heating schemes for sawtooth control in tokamak plasmas. J. Plasma Phys. 81, 365810601.Google Scholar
Cottrell, G. A. & Start, D. F. H. 1991 A large-orbit model of fast ion slowing down during ICRH: comparison with JET data. Nucl. Fusion 31, 61–71.Google Scholar
Eriksson, L.-G. & Helander, P. 1994 Monte Carlo operators for orbit-averaged Fokker–Planck equations. Phys. Plasmas 1, 308–314.Google Scholar
Eriksson, L.-G., Mantsinen, M., Borba, D., Fasoli, A., Heeter, R., Sharapov, S., Start, D. F. H., Carlsson, J., Gondhalekar, A., Hellsten, T. et al. 1998 Evidence for a wave-induced particle pinch in the presence of toroidally asymmetric ICRF waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1231–1234.Google Scholar
Fisch, N. J. 1981 Current generation by minority-species heating. Nucl. Fusion 21, 15–22.Google Scholar
Helander, P. & Catto, P. J. 2001 Neoclassical current drive by waves with a symmetric spectrum. Phys. Plasmas 8, 1988–1994.Google Scholar
Hellsten, T., Carlsson, J. & Eriksson, L.-G. 1995 Minority ion cyclotron current drive in tokamaks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3612–3615.Google Scholar
Jaeger, E. F., Berry, L. A., Dazevedo, E., Batchelor, D. B., Carter, M. D. & White, K. F. 2002 Advances in full-wave modeling of radio frequency heated, multidimensional plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 9, 1873–1881.Google Scholar
Kagan, G. & Catto, P. J. 2008 Arbitrary poloidal gyroradius effects in tokamak pedestals and transport barriers. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 50, 085010-25.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A. N. 1972 Quasilinear diffusion of an axisymmetric toroidal plasma. Phys. Fluids 15, 1063–1069.Google Scholar
Kennel, C. F. & Engelmann, F. 1966 Velocity space diffusion from weak plasma turbulence in a magnetic field. Phys. Fluids 9, 2377–2388.Google Scholar
Lee, X. S., Myra, J. R. & Catto, P. J. 1983 General frequency gyrokinetics. Phys. Fluids 26, 223–229.Google Scholar
Mantsinen, M. J., Ingesson, L. C., Johnson, T., Kiptily, V. G., Mayoral, M.-L., Sharapov, S., Alper, B., Bertalot, L., Conroy, S., Eriksson, L.-G. et al. 2002 Controlling the profile of ion-cyclotron-resonant ions in JET with the wave-induced pinch effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 115004-4.Google Scholar
Parra, F. I. & Calvo, I. 2011 Phase-space Lagrangian derivation of electrostatic gyrokinetics in general geometry. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 53, 045001.Google Scholar
Parra, F. I. & Catto, P. J. 2008 Limitations of gyrokinetics on transport time scales. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 50, 065014.Google Scholar
Parra, F. I. & Catto, P. J. 2010 Transport of momentum in full $f$ gyrokinetics. Phys. Plasmas 17, 056106.Google Scholar
Petrov, Yu. V. & Harvey, R. W. 2016 A fully-neoclassical finite-orbit-width version of the CQL3D Fokker–Planck code. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 58, 115001.Google Scholar
Stix, T. H. 1975 Fast-wave heating of a two-component plasma. Nucl. Fusion 15, 737–754.Google Scholar