Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:56:44.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Possible beneficial ponderomotive force effects on fast-wave coupling in tokamaks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

V. A. Petržílka
V. A. Petržílka
Affiliation:
Institute of Plasma Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Za Slovankou 3, P.O. Box 17, 182 11 Praha 8, Czech Republic
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

At lower-hybrid frequencies in tokamaks, ponderomotive forces at fast-wave launching typically lead in the vicinity of the launching structure to a boundary plasma density increase. This results in a decrease in the reflection coefficient, and, in detached plasmas, to the appearance of a local electric field maximum at several centimetres from the launching grill structure; this electric field maximum is connected to the reversal of the plasma density gradient near the grill mouth because of ponderomotive force effects.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , June 1994 , pp. 433 - 440
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, P. L. & Bhadra, D. K. 1986 Nucl. Fusion 26, 897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbato, E., De Marco, F., Jaeger, F. E. et al. , 1992 ENEA Frascati Internal Report 92/ 04.Google Scholar
El Shaer, M. 1986 IPP Garching Research Report III/ 118.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, A., Morishita, T. & Furutani, Y. 1980 Plasma Phys. 22, 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golant, V. 1971 Zh. Tekh. Fiz. 41, 2392.Google Scholar
Klíma, R. 1966 Soviet Phys. JETP 23, 534.Google Scholar
Lecturer, F., Soeldner, F. X., Giannone, L., Schubert, R. & Petržílka, V. 1991 Proceedings of the 18th EPS Conference on Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics, Berlin (ed. Suender, D.), vol. III, p. 409. European Physical Society.Google Scholar
McWilliams, R. & Mok, Y. 1985 Fusion Technol. 7, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreau, D. 1986 Proceedings of the intor Specialists Meeting on Noninductive Current Drive, IPP Garching Report NET-PM-86–003, p. 421.Google Scholar
Olson, L., McWilliams, R., Glanz, J. & Motley, R. W. 1984 NucI. Fusion 24, 1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, T. L. 1986 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 14, 934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pericoli-Ridolfini, V. 1991 Nuci. Fusion 31, 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petržílka, V. 1991 Proceedings of the IAEA Meeting on Fast Wave Current Drive, Aries (ed. Moreau, D., Peysson, Y. & Becoulet, A.), p. 190. CEA Cadarache.Google Scholar
Petržílka, V., Klíma, R. & Pavlo, P. 1983 J. Plasma Phys. 30, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petržílka, V., Leuterer, F., Soeldner, F. X., Giannone, L. & Schubert, R. 1991 Nucl. Fusion 31, 1758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinsker, R. I., Duvall, R. E., Fortoang, C. M. & Colestock, P. L. 1986 Nuci. Fusion 26, 941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanuki, H. & Ogino, T. 1977 Phys. Fluids 20, 1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seki, M., Ikeda, I., Imai, T., Ushigusa, K., Naitou, O., Ide, S., Kondoh, T., Nemoto, M., Takeuchi, H., Suganuma, K., Sawahata, M., Takasa, A., Takahashi, S. & Yamamoto, T. 1992 Proceedings of the international Conference on Plasma Physics, Innsbruck, vol. II, p. 985. European Physical Society.Google Scholar
Theilhaber, K. 1982 Nucl. Fusion 22, 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theilhaber, K. & Bers, A. 1980 Nucl. Fusion 20, 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Nieuwenhove, R., Van Oost, G., Koch, R., Vandeplas, P. E. & Noterdaeme, J.-M. 1988 Proceedings of the 16th EPS Conference on Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics, Venice, vol. 3, p. 412. European Physical Society.Google Scholar
Wong, K. M. & Ono, M. 1983 Nucl. Fusion 23, 805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, K. M. & Ono, M. 1984 Nuci. Fusion 24, 615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar