Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:37:00.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnetized plasma-wall transition layer with cold ions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2010

D. D. TSKHAKAYA Sr. ,
F. BINT-E-MUNIR  and
S. KUHN
D. D. TSKHAKAYA Sr.
Affiliation:
Association EURATOM-ÖAW, Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria ([email protected]) Institute of Physics, Georgian Academy of Sciences, Tbilisi, Georgia
F. BINT-E-MUNIR
Affiliation:
Association EURATOM-ÖAW, Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria ([email protected]) Department of Physics, Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan
S. KUHN
Affiliation:
Association EURATOM-ÖAW, Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The magnetized plasma-wall transition (MPWT) layer occurring, for example near a tokamak diverter, typically consists of three distinct sublayers: the Debye sheath (DS), the magnetic presheath (MPS) and the collisional presheath (CPS), with characteristic lengths λD (electron Debye length), ρi (ion gyroradius) and λ (smallest relevant ion collision length), respectively. For analytical simplicity one usually assumes the ordering λD ≪ ρi ≪ λ, or, equivalently, and (‘asymptotic three-scale (A3S) limit’), in which the three sublayers are precisely defined. In the present work the equations and length scales governing the transition, or the ‘intermediate’ regions between neighboring sublayers (DS–MPS, MPS–CPS), in the A3S limit are derived, allowing one to avoid the singularities arising from the ϵDm → 0 and ϵmc → 0 approximations. The MPS entrance and the related Bohm–Chodura condition is defined in a natural way. It is found that in the hydrodynamic Ti = 0 approximation the intermediate scales and equations have a universal form and a similar structure not only for the MPS–DS and CPS–MPS transitions but also for the DS–CPS transition in the non-magnetized case.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 76 , Special Issue 3-4: In Honor of Professor Padma Kant Shukla on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday , August 2010 , pp. 559 - 567
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Stangeby, P. C. 2000 The Plasma Boundary of Magnetic Fusion Devices. Bristol, UK: IoP, p. 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Chodura, R. 1982 Phys. Fluids 25, 1628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Kuhn, S., Riemann, K.-U., Jelic, N., Tskhakaya, D. D. Sr., Tskhakaya, D. Jr. and Stanojevic, M. 2006 Phys. Plasmas 13, 013503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Riemann, K.-U. 1994 Phys. Plasmas 1, 552; Riemann, K.-U. 2000 J. Tech.Phys. 41, 1, Special Issue, 89–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Riemann, K.-U., Seebacher, J., Tskhakaya, D. D. Sr. and Kuhn, S. 2005 Plasma Phys. Cont. Fusion 47, 1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Bint-e-Munir, F., Kuhn, S. and Tskhakaya, D. D. 2007 In: Proceedings of 34th EPS Conference on Plasma Phys, Warsaw, Poland, 2–6 July 2007, ECA vol. 31F, p. 119.Google Scholar
[7]Hille, E. 1974 Ordinary Differential Equations in the Complex Domain. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar