Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:55:55.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetic diffusion and current profiles during current reversal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

I. P. Shkarofsky
Affiliation:
MPB Technologies Inc., Sainte-Anne do Bellevue, Québec
Magdi Shoucri
Affiliation:
Institut de Rechercho de l'Hydro-Québec, Varennes, Québec

Abstract

Computer studies are performed on the temporal changes of magnetic flux surfaces and current density profiles in a tokamak (of 25 cm minor radius) undergoing current reversal. The flux on the plasma boundary is forced to vary in time so as to model a total current reversal from positive to negative in about 5 ms. A two-dimensional computer code with radial and azimuthal spatial variations has been written, as well as a simpler one-dimensional code with only radial variation. The two-dimensional code shows that the flux variation takes place in way showing the formation of magnetic islands. Both codes show that the current penetration in the plasma is much slower than the reversal time. This slow resistive penetration occurs even with an enhanced resistivity factor which increases towards the boundary and with a temperature profile which decays in time towards zero current. After maintaining a constant flat negative current for certain period, results are also obtained on the profiles during reversing back rom negative to positive current and maintaining the constant positive current.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ames, W. 1971 Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations. Barnes and Nobles.Google Scholar
Dellis, A. N. & Hosea, J. C. 1973 Princeton University Report, MATT-969.Google Scholar
Dimock, D. L., Eubank, H. P., Hinnov, E., Johnson, L. C. & Meservey, E. 1973 Nucl. Fusion, 13, 271.Google Scholar
Hawryluk, R. J., Bol, K. & Johnson, D. 1979 Nucl. Fusion, 19, 1519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawryluk, R. J., Bretz, N., Dimock, D., Hinnov, E., Johson, D., Monticello, D., McCune, D. & Suckewer, S. 1980 Princeton University Report PPPL-1572.Google Scholar
Hosea, J. C. 1974 Symposium on Plasma Heating in Toroidal Devices, Varenna, Italy, p. 189. Editrico Compositori, Bologna.Google Scholar
Kirillov, V. D., Turbnikov, B. A. & Truskin, S. A. 1975 Soviet J. Plasma Phys. 1, 117.Google Scholar
McBride, J. B., Klein, H. H., Byrne, R. N. & Krall, N. A. 1975 Nucl. Fusion, 15, 393.Google Scholar
Mirnov, S. V. 1969 Nucl. Fusion, 9, 57.Google Scholar
Webb, S. J. 1977 Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Innsbruck, p. 245. IAEA.Google Scholar