Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T08:36:35.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using vignettes to improve understanding of Social Security and annuities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2021

Anya Samek ,
Arie Kapteyn Open the ORCID record for Arie Kapteyn [Opens in a new window]  and
Andre Gray
Anya Samek*
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, USA
Arie Kapteyn
Affiliation:
National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, USA University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Andre Gray
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Evidence shows that people have difficulty understanding complex aspects of retirement planning, which leads them to under-utilize annuities and claim Social Security benefits earlier than is optimal. To target this problem, we developed vignettes about the consequences of different annuitization and claiming decisions. We evaluated our vignettes using an experiment with a representative online panel of nearly 2,000 Americans. In our experiment, respondents were either assigned to a control group with no vignette, to a written vignette, or to a video vignette. They were then asked to give advice to hypothetical persons on annuitization or Social Security claiming, and were asked factual questions about these concepts. We found evidence that being exposed to vignettes led respondents to give better advice. For example, the gap between advised claim age for a relatively healthy person versus a relatively sick person was larger by nearly a year in the vignette treatments than in the control group. Furthermore, the vignettes increased financial literacy related to these concepts by 10–15 percentage points. Interestingly, the mode of communication did not have a significant impact – the video and written vignettes were equally effective.

Keywords

Social Securityannuitiesconsequence messagingonline surveyexperimentD14C90C83
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , July 2022 , pp. 326 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, KP (2013) The usability of print and online video instructions. Technical Communication Quarterly 22, 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alsan, M, Garrick, O and Graziani, G (2019) Does diversity matter for health? Experimental evidence from Oakland. American Economic Review 109, 4071–4111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benartzi, S, Previtero, A and Thaler, RH (2011) Annuitization puzzles. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 25, 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulware, LE, Cooper, LA, Ratner, LE, LaVeist, TA and Powe, NR (2003) Race and trust in the health care system. Public Health Reports 118, 358–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, JR, Kapteyn, A, Luttmer, EFP and Mitchell, OS (2017) Cognitive constraints on valuing annuities. Journal of the European Economic Association 15, 429–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, JR, Kapteyn, A, Luttmer, EF, Mitchell, OS and Samek, A (2019) Behavioral impediments to valuing annuities: complexity and choice bracketing. PRC WP2019-5 Pension Research Council Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A (2019) Advertising: the contribution of applied cognitive psychology. Applied Cognitive Psychology 33, 168–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halberstam, Y and Knight, B (2016) Homophily, group size, and the diffusion of political information in social networks: evidence from twitter. Journal of Public Economics 143, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinberg, A, Hung, AA, Kapteyn, A, Lusardi, A, Samek, AS and Yoong, J (2014) Five steps to planning success. Experimental evidence from US households. No. w20203. National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, A, Jones, D and Woodworth, L (2020) Physician-Patient Race-Match and Patient Outcomes. Working Paper, Montana State University.Google Scholar
Klapper, L, Lusardi, A and Van Oudheusden, P (2015) Financial literacy around the world. World Bank. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
List, A and Ballenger, EE (2019) Comprehension across mediums: the case of text and video. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 31, 514–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusardi, A and Mitchell, OS (2007) Baby boomer retirement security: the roles of planning, financial literacy, and housing wealth. Journal of Monetary Economics 54, 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusardi, A and Mitchell, OS (2011) Financial literacy and planning: Implications for retirement wellbeing. No. w17078. National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusardi, A, Samek, A, Kapteyn, A, Glinert, L, Hung, A and Heinberg, A (2017) Visual tools and narratives: new ways to improve financial literacy. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance 16, 297–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, M, Smith-Lovin, L and Cook, JM (2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27, 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez-Arce, F, Yoong, J and Rabinovich, L (2019) The effect of informational prompts about spousal benefits on social security claim intentions. Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poterba, JM, Venti, SF and Wise, DA (2011) Were they prepared for retirement? Financial Status at advanced ages in the HRS and AHEAD cohorts. Investigations in the Economics of Aging. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 21–69.Google Scholar
Rabinovich, L and Samek, A (2018) ‘No regrets’: qualitative evidence on early claiming of social security retirement. Journal of Aging Studies 46, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samek, A and Sydnor, J (2017) Simplifying Health Insurance Choice with Consequence Graphs. Technical report, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Weller, JA, Dieckmann, NF, Tusler, M, Mertz, CK, Burns, WJ and Peters, E (2013) Development and testing of an abbreviated numeracy scale: a Rasch analysis approach. The Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 26, 198–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Samek et al. supplementary material

Samek et al. supplementary material 1

Download Samek et al. supplementary material(File)
File 431.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Samek et al. supplementary material

Samek et al. supplementary material 2

Download Samek et al. supplementary material(File)
File 534.5 KB