Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:01:00.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of changing demographics and pensions on the demand for housing and financial assets*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2009

ALEŠ ČERNÝ ,
DAVID MILES  and
L'UBOMÍR SCHMIDT
ALEŠ ČERNÝ
Affiliation:
Cass Business School, City University London (e-mail: [email protected])
DAVID MILES
Affiliation:
Bank of England and Imperial College Business School, London (e-mail: [email protected])
L'UBOMÍR SCHMIDT
Affiliation:
UBS London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to analyse the impact of shifting demographics and changes in pension arrangements in a model that includes housing as both an investment asset and a consumption good. We consider the impact on welfare, and on macroeconomic aggregates, of some specific pension reforms. Using a calibrated OLG model with several sources of uncertainty, we find that the impact of ageing and of reform of social security upon the demand for housing and the level of owner occupation is substantial. We find that pension reform has a very significant impact on the demand for, and price of, housing. The interaction between pension reform and housing is a neglected subject and one which the results we present suggest is important.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , July 2010 , pp. 393 - 420
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auerbach, A. and Kotlikoff, L. (1987) Dynamic Fiscal Policy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Banks, J. and Johnson, P. (1994) Equivalence scale relativities revisited. The Economic Journal, 104(425): 883–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, K. (2004) Review of Housing Supply. Final report, Her Majesty's Treasury, UK.Google Scholar
Barsky, B., Juster, F. T., Kimball, M., and Shapiro, M. (1997) Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: an experimental approach in the health and retirement study. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 12(2): 537–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkovec, J. and Fullerton, D. (1992) A general equilibrium model of housing, taxes, and portfolio choice. The Journal of Political Economy, 100(2): 390–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breyer, F. (1989) On the intergenerational Pareto efficiency of pay as you go financial pension systems. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 145: 643–658.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. Y. and Cocco, J. F. (2003) Household risk management and optimal mortgage choice, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4): 1449–1494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J., Cocco, J., Gomes, F. and Maenhout, P. (2001) Investing retirement wealth: a life-cycle model. In Campbell, John Y. and Martin, Feldstein (eds), Risk Aspects of Investment-Based Social Security Reform. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocco, J. (2005) Portfolio choice in the presence of housing. Review of Financial Studies, 18(2): 535–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Nardi, M., Imrohoroglu, S., and Sargent, T. (1999) Projected US demographics and social security. Review of Economic Dynamics, 2(3): 575–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimson, E., Marsh, P., and Staunton, M. (2002) Triumph of the Optimists: 101 Years of Global Investment Return. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., and Wagner, G. (2005) Individual risk attitudes: new evidence from a large, representative, experimentally validated survey. IZA (Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit) Discussion Paper 1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Family Resources Survey (2003), Department for Work and Pensions, UK.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. V. and Ioannides, Y. M. (1983) A model of housing tenure choice. American Economic Review, 73(1): 98–113.Google Scholar
Horioka, C. Y. (2001) Are the Japanese selfish, dynastic or altruistic? Japanese Economic Review, 53(1): 26–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, R. G., and Judd, K. L. (1987) Social Security and Individual Welfare: Precautionary Saving, Borrowing Constraints, and the Payroll Tax. American Economic Review, 77(4): 630–646.Google Scholar
Iacoviello, M. (2005) House Prices, Borrowing Constraints, and Monetary Policy in the Business Cycle. The American Economic Review, 95(3): 739–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IMF (2004) World Economic Outlook. Washington, Chapter II.Google Scholar
Imrohoroglu, A., Imrohoroglu, S., and Joines, D. (1995) A life cycle analysis of social security. Economic Theory, 6: 83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imrohoroglu, A., Imrohoroglu, S., and Joines, D. (1999a) A dynamic stochastic general equilibrium analysis of social security. In Kehoe, T. and Prescott, E. (eds), The Discipline of Applied General Equilibrium. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Imrohoroglu, A., Imrohoroglu, S., and Joines, D. (1999b) Computational models of social security: a survey. In Marimon, R. and Scott, A. (eds), Computational Methods for the Study of Dynamic Economies. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kotlikoff, L., Smetters, K., and Walliser, J. (1999) Privatizing social security in the United States – comparing the options. Review of Economic Dynamics, 2: 532–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotlikoff, L. and Summers, L. (1981) The role of intergenerational transfers in aggregate capital accumulation. Journal of Political Economy, 89(4): 706–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lustig, H. N. and Van Nieuwerburgh, S. G. (2005) Housing collateral, consumption insurance, and risk premia: an empirical perspective. Journal of Finance, 60(3): 1167–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClements, L. D. (1977) Equivalence scales for children. Journal of Public Economics, 8(2): 191–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, D. K. (1997) A household level study of the determinants of income and consumption. The Economic Journal, 107(440): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, D. K. (2003) The UK mortgage market: taking a longer term view – interim report. Her Majesty's Treasury, UK.Google Scholar
Miles, D. K. (2004) The UK mortgage market: taking a longer term view – final report. Her Majesty's Treasury, UK.Google Scholar
Miles, D. K. and Černý, A. (2006) Risk, return and portfolio allocation under alternative pension systems with incomplete and imperfect financial markets. The Economic Journal, 116(2): 529–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office for National Statistics (2004a) Housing Statistics.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics (2004b) Interim Life Tables for Great Britain.Google Scholar
Sefton, J., Dutta, J., and Weale, M. (1997) A calibrated model of saving and income distribution for the UK. NIESR Discussion Paper 123.Google Scholar
Storesletten, K., Telmer, C., and Yaron, A. (1999) The risk sharing implications of alternative social security arrangements. Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 50: 213–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, A. (2004) The Pensirons Commission, first report, HMSO.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weale, M., Dutta, J., and Sefton, J. (2001) Income distribution and income dynamics in the United Kingdom. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16: 599–616.Google Scholar
Yao, R. and Zhang, H. H. (2005) Optimal consumption and portfolio choices with risky housing and borrowing constraints. Review of Financial Studies, 18(1): 197–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar