Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:09:49.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of financial knowledge and demographic variables on passive and active investment in Chile's pension plan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2014

WERNER D. KRISTJANPOLLER  and
JOSEPHINE E. OLSON
WERNER D. KRISTJANPOLLER
Affiliation:
Departamento de Industrias, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Av. España 1680, Valparaíso, Chile (e-mail: [email protected])
JOSEPHINE E. OLSON
Affiliation:
Joseph M. Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, 308 Mervis Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper contributes to research on defined contribution (DC) retirement plans by examining how financial knowledge and demographic factors influenced Chile's pension holders' choice between a default life-cycle retirement plan and active management. About one third of Chileans held default funds in 2009; younger people, men, people with lower incomes, and people with low financial knowledge were more likely to choose the default. For active investors, we examined what variables influenced their choice. Nearly three quarters of active investors chose more risky funds that the defaults for their age group. However, risk taking tended to decrease with age and to increase with income, financial knowledge and risk tolerance.

Keywords

D14E21D81DC Pension PlansFinancial LiteracyPortfolio ChoiceRetirementChilean Multi-fund System
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , July 2015 , pp. 293 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Agnew, J., Balduzzi, P., and Sundén, A. (2003) Portfolio choice and trading in a large 401(k) plan. The American Economic Review, 93(1): 193–215.Google Scholar
Agnew, J. R. and Szykman, L. R. (2005) Asset allocation and information overload: the influence of information display, asset choice, and investor experience. The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 6(2): 57–70.Google Scholar
Almenberg, J. and Dreber, A. (2012) Gender, stock market participation and financial literacy. SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, No. 737. Available online at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1880909.Google Scholar
Almenberg, J. and Säve-Söderbergh, J. (2011) Financial literacy and retirement planning in Sweden. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 10(4): 585–598.Google Scholar
Arano, K., Parker, C., and Terry, R. (2010) Gender based risk aversion and retirement asset allocation. Economic Inquiry, 48(1): 147–155.Google Scholar
Arenas de Mesa, A., Bravo, D., Behrman, J. R., Mitchell, O. S., and Todd, P. (2006) The Chilean pension reform turns 25: lessons from the social protection survey. NBER Working Paper No. 12401. Available online at http://www.nber.org/papers/w12401.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. and Messy, F. (2012) Measuring financial literacy: results of the OECD/International Network on Financial Education (INFE) pilot study. OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions, No. 15. Available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k9csfs90fr4-en.Google Scholar
Barber, B. M. and Odean, T. (2001) Boys will be boys: gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1): 261–292.Google Scholar
Barrientos, C. and Ruiz, J. L. (2011) Determinantes de la elección de multifondos en las AFP chilenas y efecto default. Proceedings of XXVII ENEFA, 4: 573–592.Google Scholar
Bernasek, A. and Shwiff, S. (2001) Gender, risk and retirement. Journal of Economic Issues, 35(2): 345–356.Google Scholar
Berstein, S., Fuentes, O., and Torrealba, N. (2010) In an individually funded pension system: how can risks be mitigated? Working Paper 36, Superintendenica de Pensionses, Chile. Available online at http://ideas.repec.org/p/sdp/sdpwps/36.html.Google Scholar
Berstein, S., Fuentes, O., and Villatoro, F. (2013) Default investment strategies in a defined contribution pension system. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 12(4): 379–414.Google Scholar
Booth, P. and Yakoubov, Y. (2000) Investment policy for defined-contribution pension scheme members close to retirement. North American Actuarial Journal, 4(2): 1–19.Google Scholar
Byrne, A., Blake, D., Cairns, A., and Down, K. (2007) Default funds in U. K. defined-contribution plans. Financial Analysts Journal, 63(4): 40–51.Google Scholar
Calvet, L. E. and Sodini, P. (2014) Twin picks: disentangling the determinants of risk-taking in household portfolios. Journal of Finance, 69(2): 869–908.Google Scholar
Calvet, L. E., Campbell, J. Y., and Sodini, P. (2007) Down or out: assessing the welfare costs of household investment mistakes. Journal of Political Economy, 115(5): 707–757.Google Scholar
Calvet, L. E., Campbell, J. Y., and Sodini, P. (2009) Fight or flight? Portfolio rebalancing by individual investors. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(1): 301–348.Google Scholar
Cronqvist, H. (2006) Advertising and portfolio choice. PhD thesis. University of Chicago. In ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.Google Scholar
Cronqvist, H. and Thaler, R. H. (2004) Design choices in privatized social security systems: learning from the Swedish experience. American Economic Review, 94(2): 424–428.Google Scholar
Croson, R. and Gneezy, U. (2009) Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2): 448–474.Google Scholar
Dahlquist, M., Martinez, J. V., and Söderlind, P. (2012) Individual investor activity and performance. Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper No. 8744. Available online at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1988676.Google Scholar
Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., and Wagner, G. G. (2011) Individual risk attitudes: measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3): 522–550.Google Scholar
Dwyer, P. D., Gilkeson, J. H., and List, J. A. (2002) Gender differences in revealed risk taking: evidence from mutual fund investors. Economics Letters, 76: 151–158.Google Scholar
Eckel, C. C. and Grossman, P. J. (2008) Forecasting risk attitudes: an experimental study using actual and forecast gamble choices. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Gallery, G. and Gallery, N. (2005) Paradox of choice in a mandatory pension savings system: challenges for Australia retirement income policy. Policy and Politics, 33(3): 519–532.Google Scholar
Gerrans, P. and Clark-Murphy, M. (2004) Gender differences in retirement savings decisions. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 3(2): 145–164.Google Scholar
Gomes, F. J., Kotlikoff, L. J., and Viceira, L. M. (2008) Optimal life-cycle investing with flexible labor supply: a welfare analysis of life-cycle funds. American Economic Review, 98(2): 297–303.Google Scholar
Halko, M., Kaustia, M., and Alanko, E. (2012) The gender effect in risky asset holdings. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 83(1): 66–81.Google Scholar
Hastings, J. and Tejeda-Ashton, L. (2008) Financial literacy, information and demand elasticity: survey and experimental evidence from Mexico. NBER Working Paper No. 14538. Available online at http://www.nber.org/papers/w14538.Google Scholar
Hastings, J., Mitchell, O. S., and Chyn, E. (2011) Fees, framing, and financial literacy in the choice of pension manager. In Mitchell, O. S. and Lusardi, A. (eds), Financial Literacy: Implications for Retirement Security and the Financial Marketplace. New York: Oxford University Press, Ch. 6.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. S. and Kamenica, E. (2010) Choice proliferation, simplicity seeking, and asset allocation. Journal of Public Economics, 94(7–8): 530–539.Google Scholar
Landerretche, O. and Martínez, C. (2013) Voluntary savings, financial behaviour, and pension financial iteracy: evidence from Chile. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 12(3): 251–297.Google Scholar
Lusardi, A. (2012) Numeracy, financial literacy, and financial decision-making. Numeracy, 5(1): Article 2.Google Scholar
Lusardi, A. and Mitchell, O. (2007 a) Baby boomer retirement security: the role of planning, financial literacy, and housing wealth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54: 205–224.Google Scholar
Lusardi, A. and Mitchell, O. (2007 b) Financial literacy and retirement planning: new evidence from the RAND American life panel. Michigan Retirement Research Center Research Paper No. WP 2007-157. Available online at http://hdl.handle.net/10419/25534.Google Scholar
Lusardi, A. and Mitchell, O. (2008) Planning and financial literacy. How do women fare? American Economic Review, 98(2): 413–417.Google Scholar
Madrian, B. C. and Shea, D. F. (2001) The power of suggestion: inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 66(4): 1149–1187.Google Scholar
Mitchell, O. S. and Utkus, S. (2012) Target-date funds in 401(k) retirement plans. NBER Working Paper 17911. Available online at http://www.nber.org/papers/w17911.Google Scholar
Mitchell, O. S., Mottola, G., Utkus, S., and Yamaguchi, T. (2008) The dynamics of lifecycle investing in 401(k) plans. PARC Working Papers, WPS 08-06. Available online at http://repository.upenn.edu/parc_working_papers/19/.Google Scholar
Mitchell, O. S., Mottola, G. R., Utkus, S. P., and Yamaguchi, T. (2009) Default, framing and spillover effects: the case of lifecycle funds in 401(k) plans. NBER Working Paper 15108. Available online at http://www.nber.org/papers/w15108.pdf.Google Scholar
Morrin, M., Broniarczyk, S. M., and Inman, J. J. (2012) Plan format and participation in 401(k) plans: the moderating role of investor knowledge. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 31(2): 254–268.Google Scholar
Papke, L. E. (1998) How are participants investing their accounts in participant directed individual account pension plans? American Economic Review, 88(2): 212–216.Google Scholar
Raddatz, C. and Schmukler, S. (2011) Deconstructing herding: evidence from pension fund investment behavior. Policy Research Working Paper Series 5700, World Bank. Available online at http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-5700.Google Scholar
Rozinka, E. and Tapia, W. (2007) Survey of investment choice by pension fund members. OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions, No. 7. Available online at http://www.oecd.org/finance/private-pensions/37977416.pdf.Google Scholar
Säve-Söderbergh, J. (2012) Self-directed pensions: gender, risk and portfolio choices. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 114(3): 705–728.Google Scholar
Sundén, A. (2006) The Swedish experience with pension reform. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(1): 133–148.Google Scholar
Sundén, A. and Surette, B. (1998) Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans. American Economic Review, 88(2): 207–211.Google Scholar
Tapia, W. and Yermo, J. (2007) Implications of behavioural economics for mandatory individual account pension systems. OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions, No. 11. OECD Publishing. Available online at http://www.oecd.org/finance/private-pensions/37977416.pdf.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R. (2003) Libertarian paternalism. American Economic Review, 93(2): 175–179.Google Scholar
Van Rooij, M., Lusardi, A., and Alessie, R. (2011) Financial literacy and stock market participation. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(2): 449–472.Google Scholar

Survey References

Sub-Secretariat de Social Protection of Chile (2006). Survey of Social Protection (SSP) 2006. www.proteccionsocial.cl

Sub-Secretariat de Social Protection of Chile (2009). Survey of Social Protection (SSP) 2009. www.proteccionsocial.cl