Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T22:27:55.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Annuity pricing in public pension plans: importance of interest rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2019

Nino Abashidze ,
Robert L. Clark ,
Robert G. Hammond ,
Beth M. Ritter  and
David Vanderweide
Nino Abashidze
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Robert L. Clark*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Robert G. Hammond
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Finance, and Legal Studies, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
Beth M. Ritter
Affiliation:
Department of Management, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
David Vanderweide
Affiliation:
Fiscal Research Division, North Carolina General Assembly, Raleigh, NC, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines the distribution options of 85 large public retirement plans covering general state employees, teachers, and local government employees. The interest rates used to price annuities vary considerably across the plans. As a result, retirees with the same monthly benefit if a single life benefit is chosen will have substantially different monthly benefits if they select a joint and survivor annuity. We examine the impact of variation in the pricing of annuity options using both cross-plan differences in interest rates and the change in the choice of annuity options in one plan after the price of options changes due to new assumed interest rates and mortality rates.

Keywords

Joint & survivor annuitiespricing of annuitiespublic pension plansH7J26J45
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , January 2021 , pp. 27 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

[email protected]

References

Aura, S (2005) Does the balance of power within a family matter? The case of the retirement equity act. Journal of Public Economics 89, 1699–1717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benatzi, S, Previtero, A and Thaler, R (2011) Annuitization puzzles. Journal of Economic Perspectives 25, 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J (2001) Private pensions, mortality risks, and the decision to annuitize. Journal of Public Economics 82, 29–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J and Poterba, J (2000) Joint life annuities and annuity demand by married couples. Journal of Risk and Insurance 67, 527–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J, Kling, JR, Mullainathan, S and Wrobel, MV (2008) Why don't people insure late-life consumption? A framing explanation of the under-annuitization puzzle. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 98, 304–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, M and Teppa, F (2007) The choice between an annuity and a lump sum: results from Swiss pension funds. Journal of Public Economics 91, 1944–1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, J and Reuter, J (2012) How do retirees value life annuities? Evidence from public employees. The Review of Financial Studies 25, 2601–2634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R and Cowell, J (2017) Annuity options in public pension plans. In Mitchell, O, Hammond, B and Utkus, S (eds), Financial Decision Making and Retirement Security in an Aging World. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 130–152.Google Scholar
Clark, R and Schieber, S (2004) Adopting cash balance pension plans: implications and issues. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 3, 271–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R, Morrill, M and Vanderweide, D (2014) Defined benefit pension plan distribution decisions by public sector employees. Journal of Public Economics 116, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, RL, Hammond, RG, Morrill, MS and Vanderweide, D (2018a) Annuity options in public pension plans: the curious case of social security leveling. Journal of Retirement 6, 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R, Pathak, A and Pelletier, D (2018b) Supplemental retirement savings plans in the public sector: participation and contribution decisions by school personnel. Journal of Labor Research 39, 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R, Hammond, R and Vanderweide, D (2019) Navigating complex financial decisions at retirement: evidence from annuity choices in public sector pensions. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 18, 594–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, K and Nicholson, S (1998) Selection of A Joint-and-Survivor Pension. Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion, Paper No. 1175-98.Google Scholar
Johnson, R, Uccello, C and Goldwyn, J (2005) Who foregoes survivor protection in employer-sponsored annuities. The Gerontologist 45, 26–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGill, D, Brown, K, Haley, J, Schieber, S and Warshawsky, M (2010) Fundamentals of Private Pensions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Novy-Marx, R and Rauh, JD (2009) The liabilities and risks of state-sponsored pension plans. Journal of Economic Perspectives 23, 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew (2018) State Public Pension Funds’ Investment Practices and Performance: 2016 Update. Philadelphia, PA: Pew. Available at https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-briefs/2018/09/state-public-pension-funds--investment-practices-and--performance-2016-data-update (Accessed 5 March 2019).Google Scholar
Wisconsin Legislative Council (2016) 2015 Comparative Study of Major Public Pension Systems. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Legislative Council. Available at https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/misc/lc/comparative_retirement_study/2015_retirement.pdf.Google Scholar