Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:55:32.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An empirical analysis of the annuity rate in Chile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2007

ROBERTO ROCHA ,
MARCO MORALES  and
CRAIG THORBURN
ROBERTO ROCHA*
Affiliation:
World Bank
MARCO MORALES
Affiliation:
Diego Portales University
CRAIG THORBURN
Affiliation:
World Bank
*
*Communications should be addressed to Roberto Rocha: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Empirical analyses of annuities markets have been limited to a few developed countries and restricted by data limitations. Chile provides excellent conditions for research on annuities due to the depth of its market and the availability of data. The paper utilizes a panel of life insurance company data to examine econometrically the main determinants of the annuity rate, defined as the internal rate of return on annuities. The results indicate that the annuity rate is determined by the risk-free interest rate, the share of privately issued higher yield securities in the portfolio of providers, as a proxy for the spread over the risk-free rate, the leverage of providers, the level of broker's commissions, the market share of individual providers, the level of the premium, and the degree of market competition. The results also show that efforts to improve market transparency produced structural shifts in the parameters of the annuity rate equation. The results are consistent with separate research on money's worth ratios, and indicate the need to develop appropriate financial instruments, allowing providers to hedge their risks while extracting higher returns, and also to ensure competition and transparency in annuities markets, in order to ensure good outcomes for annuitants.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 95 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arellano, M. (2003) Panel Data Econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J., Mitchell, O. S., Poterba, J. M., and Warshawsky, M. J. (2001) The Role of Annuity Markets in Financing Retirement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Choi, I. (2001) Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20: 249–272.Google Scholar
Delianedis, G. and Geske, R. (2001) The components of corporate credit spreads: default, recovery, tax, jumps, liquidity, and market factors. Working Paper 22-01, The Anderson School UCLA.Google Scholar
Duffee, G. R. (1998) The relation between treasury yields and corporate bond yield spreads. The Journal of Finance, 53(6): 2225–2241.Google Scholar
Duffee, G. R. (1999) Estimating the price of default risk. The Review of Financial Studies, 12(1): 197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, E. J., Gruber, M. J., Agrawal, D., and Mann, C. (2001) Explaining the rate spread on corporate bonds. The Journal of Finance, 56(1): 247–277.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1932) Statistical Methods for Research Workers. fourth edition. Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
G-10 (2005) Ageing and pension system reform: implications for financial markets and economic policies. Unpublished manuscript, September.Google Scholar
Honda, Y. (1985) Testing the error components model with non-normal disturbances. Review of Economic Studies, 52: 681–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., and Shin, Y. (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115: 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Estelle, Martinez, Guillermo, and Iglesias, Augusto (2006) The payout stage in chile: who annuitizes and why? Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 5(2): 121–154.Google Scholar
Levin, A., Lin, C. F., and Chu, C. (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddala, G. S. and Wu, S. (1999) A comparative study of unit roots with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61: 631–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, S. and Perron, P. (2001) Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica, 69: 1519–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perron, P. (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica, 57: 1361–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocha, R. and Thorburn, C. (2006) Developing Annuities Markets: The Experience of Chile. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorburn, C., Rocha, R., and Morales, M. (2006) An analysis of money's worth ratios in Chile. World Bank Working Paper No. 3926, June. The World Bank, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, E. (2005) Annuity markets: competition, regulation and myopia? Unpublished manuscript, December. Catholic University of Chile.Google Scholar
Wolswijk, G. and de Haan, J. (2005) Government debt management in the Euro area: recent theoretical developments and changes in practice. European Central Bank Occasional Paper No. 25, March.Google Scholar