Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T11:32:13.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recovery measures of underfunded pension funds: higher contributions, no indexation or pension cuts?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2016

LEO DE HAAN
LEO DE HAAN*
Affiliation:
Economics and Research Division, De Nederlandsche Bank, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using recovery plan data of 213 underfunded Dutch pension funds for the years 2011, 2012 and 2013, discrete choice models are estimated describing pension funds' choices between three recovery measures: higher contributions, no indexation and pension cuts. The estimation results suggest, first, that pension cuts are more likely when the funding ratio is very low, there is little time left for recovery, the pension fund is not a corporate pension fund, and its participants are still relatively young. Second, the results suggest that Dutch pension funds consider contribution increase first, no indexation second and pension cuts only as a last resort.

Keywords

G23G28G32Pension fundsfunding ratioregulationrecovery plans
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , October 2018 , pp. 437 - 468
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author would like to thank two anonymous referees and the editor (David Love), Jacob Bikker, Laurence Booth, Dirk Broeders, Jakob de Haan, Paul Hilbers, Jeroen Hinloopen, Steven Jonk, Agnes Joseph, Sebastiaan Pool, Maarten van Rooij, participants of the 2015 World Finance Conference (Buenos Aires) and the Netspar Pension Day (Utrecht, 2015), and seminar participants at DNB for useful comments on earlier versions. Patrick Colijn, Henk van Kerkhoff and Enrico Vroombout provided valuable data assistance. The views expressed are the author's and do not necessarily reflect official positions of DNB.

References

Beetsma, R. M. W. J. and Bucciol, A. (2011) Differentiating indexation in Dutch pension funds. De Economist, 159: 323–360.Google Scholar
Bikker, J. A. and Vlaar, P. J. G. (2007) Conditional indexation in defined benefit pension plans in the Netherlands. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 32: 494–515.Google Scholar
Bikker, J. A., Broeders, D., Hollanders, D., and Ponds, E. (2012) Pension funds’ asset allocation and participant age: a test of the life-cycle model. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 79(3): 595–618.Google Scholar
Bikker, J. A., Knaap, T., and Romp, W. E. (2014) Measuring and explaining implicit risk sharing in defined benefit pension funds. Applied Economics, 46(17): 1996–2009.Google Scholar
Blome, S., Fachiner, K., Franzen, D., Scheuenstuhl, G., and Yermo, J. (2007) Pension fund regulation and risk management: results from an ALM optimisation exercise. In Lindeman, D. and Yermo, J. (eds), Protecting Pensions: Policy Analysis and Examples from OECD Countries. OECD Private Pensions Series No. 8, pp. 161–212.Google Scholar
Broeders, D. and Pröpper, M. (2010) Risk-based supervision of pension funds in the Netherlands. In Micocci, M., Gregoriou, G. N., and Masala, G. B. (eds), Pension Fund Risk Management: Financial and Actuarial Modeling. Boca Raton: Chapmann & Hall, pp. 473–508.Google Scholar
Broeders, D., Hilbers, P., Rijsbergen, D., and Shen, N. (2014) What drives pension indexation in turbulent times? An empirical examination of Dutch pension funds. De Economist, 162: 41–70.Google Scholar
Bucciol, A. and Beetsma, R. M. W. J. (2010) Inter- and intra-generational consequences of pension buffer policy under demographic, financial and economic shocks. CESifo Economic Studies, 56(3): 366–403.Google Scholar
Chen, D. H. J., Beetsma, R. M. W. J., Ponds, E. H. M., and Romp, W. E. (2014) Intergenerational risk-sharing through funded pension and public debt. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 15(2): 127–159.Google Scholar
Davis, E. P. and De Haan, L. (2012) Pension fund finance and sponsoring companies. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 11(3): 439–463.Google Scholar
De Haan, L. and Hinloopen, J. (2003) Preference hierarchies for internal finance, bank loans, bond, and share issues: evidence for Dutch firms. Journal of Empirical Finance, 10: 661–681.Google Scholar
De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) (2013) Five years in the pensions sector: curtailment and indexation in perspective. DNBulletin 7 March. Available online at http://www.dnb.nl/en/news/news-and-archive/dnbulletin-2013/dnb286393.jsp.Google Scholar
Federation of the Dutch Pension Funds (2010) The Dutch Pension System: an Overview of the Key Aspects. The Hague.Google Scholar
Hinz, R. and Van Dam, R. (2008) Risk-based supervision of pension funds in the Netherlands. In Brunner, G., Hinz, R., and Rocha, R. (eds), Risk-based Supervision of Pension Funds: Emerging Practices and Challenges. Washinton DC: The World Bank. pp. 51–94Google Scholar
Pino, A. and Yermo, J. (2010) The impact of the 2007–2009 crisis on social security and private pension funds: a threat to their financial soundness? International Social Security Review, 63(2): 5–30.Google Scholar
Ponds, E. H. M. and Van Riel, B. (2009) Sharing risk: the Netherlands’ new approach to pensions. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 8(1): 91–105.Google Scholar
Rauh, J. D. (2009) Risk shifting versus risk management: investment policy in corporate pension plans. Review of Financial Studies, 22(7): 2687–2734.Google Scholar
Smid, L. (2010) Herstelbronnen van pensioenfondsen: een analyse op basis van herstelplannen (Sources of recovery for pension funds: an analysis of recovery plans). Tijdschrift voor Pensioenvraagstukken, 2010/1: 3–7.Google Scholar
Stroop, B. (2008) Het dekkingsgraadsjabloon nader verklaard (Explanation of the funding ratio template). De Actuaris, July/September, 27–29/48–51.Google Scholar
The Pension Regulator (2007) Recovery plans: an initial analysis. Available online at http://www.thepensionsregulator.gov.uk.Google Scholar
Van Ewijk, C. (2009) Credit crisis and Dutch pension funds: who bears the shock? De Economist, 157(3): 337–351.Google Scholar
Van Rooij, M., Siegmann, A., and Vlaar, P. (2008) Market valuation, pension fund policy and contribution volatility. De Economist, 156(1): 73–93.Google Scholar
Veltrop, D. B., Hermes, N., Postma, T. J. B. M. and De Haan, J. (2015) A tale of two factions: why and when factional demographic faultlines hurt board performance. Corporate Governance: an International Review, 23(2): 145–160.Google Scholar