Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T03:24:25.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does retirement flexibility provide a hedge against macroeconomic risk?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2016

YVONNE ADEMA ,
JAN BONENKAMP  and
LEX MEIJDAM
YVONNE ADEMA
Affiliation:
CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, Den Haag, Netherlands (e-mail: [email protected])
JAN BONENKAMP
Affiliation:
All Pensions Group (APG) and Netspar, Amsterdam, Netherlands
LEX MEIJDAM
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and CentER, Tilburg University, and Netspar, Tilburg, Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Retirement flexibility is often seen as a hedge against macroeconomic risks such as capital market risks, which justifies more risky asset portfolios. This paper analyses the robustness of this claim in both a partial equilibrium and general equilibrium setting. We show that this positive relationship between risk taking and retirement flexibility is weakened and under some conditions even turned around if not only capital market risks, but also productivity risks are considered. Productivity risk in combination with a high elasticity of substitution between consumption and leisure creates a positive correlation between asset returns and labour income, reducing the willingness of consumers to bear risk.

Keywords

E21G11J26Retirement (in)flexibilityportfolio choicegeneral equilibriumintratemporal substitution elasticity
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 1 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We are grateful to Casper van Ewijk, Devis Geron, Jochen Mierau, Ward Romp and Ed Westerhout for their comments on earlier versions of this paper. We also wish to thank the participants of the Netspar pension workshop in Utrecht (November 10, 2010), the participants of the Netspar International Pension Workshop in Turin (June 16, 2011) and the participants of the Annual Congress of the International Institute of Public Finance in Ann Arbor, Michigan (August 8, 2011) for helpful comments and suggestions.

References

Adema, Y. (2008) Chapter 4: Pensions, inflation risk and portfolio choice. In The International Spillover Effects of Ageing and Pensions. Tilburg: Tilburg University, pp. 99–145.Google Scholar
Adema, Y., Bonenkamp, J. and Meijdam, L. (2016) Flexible pension take-up in social security. International Tax and Public Finance, 23: 316–342.Google Scholar
Asch, B., Haider, S. and Zissimopoulos, J. (2005) Financial incentives and retirement: evidence from federal civil service workers. Journal of Public Economics, 89: 427–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attanasio, O. and Weber, G. (1995) Is consumption growth consistent with intertemporal optimization? Evidence for the consumer expenditure survey. Journal of Political Economy, 103: 1121–1157.Google Scholar
Basak, S. (1999) On the fluctuations in consumption and market returns in the presence of labor and human capital. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 23: 1029–1064.Google Scholar
Baxter, M. and Jermann, U. (1997) The international diversification puzzle is worse than you think. American Economic Review, 87: 170–180.Google Scholar
Beetsma, R. and Bovenberg, A. (2009) Pensions and intergenerational risk-sharing in general equilibrium. Economica, 76: 364–386.Google Scholar
Benzoni, L., Collin-Dufresne, P. and Goldstein, R. (2007) Portfolio choice over the life-cycle when the stocks and labor markets are cointegrated. Journal of Finance, 62: 2123–2167.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O. and Fisher, S. (1989) Lectures on Macroeconomics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloemen, H. (2011) The effect of private wealth on the retirement rate: an empirical analysis. Economica, 78: 637–655.Google Scholar
Bodie, Z., Merton, R. and Samuelson, W. (1992) Labor supply flexibility and portfolio choice in a life cycle model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 16: 427–449.Google Scholar
Bohn, H. (2009) Intergenerational risk sharing and fiscal policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 56: 805–816.Google Scholar
Bovenberg, A. and Uhlig, H. (2008) Pension systems and the allocation of macroeconomic risk. In Reichlin, L. and West, K. (eds), NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics 2006. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 241–344.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. and Viceira, L. (2002) Strategic Asset Allocation; Portfolio Choice for Long-Term Investors. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. and Viceira, L. (2005) The term structure of the risk-return tradeoff. Financial Analysts Journal, 61: 34–44.Google Scholar
Choi, K. and Shim, G. (2006) Disutility, optimal retirement, and portfolio selection. Mathematical Finance, 16: 443–467.Google Scholar
Choi, K., Shim, G. and Shin, Y. (2008) Optimal portfolio, consumption-leisure and retirement choice problem with CES utility. Mathematical Finance, 18: 445–472.Google Scholar
Coile, C. and Gruber, J. (2001) Social security incentives for retirement. In Wise, D. (ed.) Themes in the Economics of Aging. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 311–341.Google Scholar
Diamond, P. (1965) National debt in a neoclassical growth model. American Economic Review, 55: 1126–1150.Google Scholar
Diamond, P. and Mirrlees, J. (1978) A model of social insurance with variable retirement. Journal of Public Economics, 10: 295–336.Google Scholar
Erosa, A., Fuster, L. and Kambourov, G. (2012) Labor supply and government programs: a cross-country analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 59: 84–107.Google Scholar
Farhi, E. and Panageas, S. (2007) Saving and investing for early retirement: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 83: 87–121.Google Scholar
French, E. (2005) The effects of health, wealth, and wages on labour supply and retirement behaviour. Review of Economic Studies, 72: 395–427.Google Scholar
Gottardi, P. and Kubler, F. (2011) Social security and risk sharing. Journal of Economic Theory, 146: 1078–1106.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. and Wise, D. (1999) Social Security and Retirement around the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, L. and Singleton, K. (1983) Stochastic consumption, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of asset returns. Journal of Political Economy, 91: 249–265.Google Scholar
Juillard, M. and Kamenik, O. (2005) Solving sdge models: approximation about the stochastic steady state. Computing in Economics and Finance 2005, 106, Society for Computational Economics.Google Scholar
Krueger, A. and Pischke, S. (1992) The effects of social security on labor supply: a cohort analysis of the notch generation. Journal of Labor Economics, 10: 412–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, D. and Kubler, F. (2006) Pareto-improving social security reform when financial markets are incomplete!? American Economic Review, 96: 737–755.Google Scholar
OECD (2011) Pensions at a Glance: Retirement-Income Systems in OECD and G20 Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Olovsson, C. (2010) Quantifying the risk-sharing welfare gains of social security. Journal of Monetary Economics, 57: 364–375.Google Scholar
Pestieau, P. and Possen, U. (2010) Retirement as a hedge. Netspar Discussion Paper no. 05/2010-049.Google Scholar
Pijoan-Mas, J. (2006) Precautionary savings or working longer hours? Review of Economic Dynamics, 9: 326–352.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. (1958) An exact consumption loan model of interest with or without the social contrivance of money. Journal of Political Economy, 66: 467–482.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Adema supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Adema supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 185.9 KB