Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:59:58.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Albian (Cretaceous) asteroids (Echinodermata) from Texas and their paleobiological implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Daniel B. Blake  and
Robert Reid III
Daniel B. Blake
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801
Robert Reid III
Affiliation:
1709 Tremont Av., Fort Worth, Texas 76107
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An asteroid fauna is described from the Albian (Cretaceous) interval of the Washita Group of central Texas. New genera and species are Alkaidia sumralli, (Benthopectinidae), Capellia mauricei (Goniasteridae), and Betelgeusia reidi (Radiasteridae). Additional new genera are Fomalhautia (Goniasteridae), and Denebia and Altairia (Ophidiasteridae). Crateraster texensis (Goniasteridae), new combination, is similar to the European type species, C. quinqueloba. An unnamed species of Crateraster and an unassigned goniasterid are also present. All Washita genera are extinct, but all belong to extant families. The fauna is largely distinct from that of the somewhat younger European Cretaceous chalk.

The Radiasteridae (e.g., Betelgeusia) is inferred to hold a basal position in the Paxillosida; Betelgeusia extends the range of the family back to the Cretaceous, closer to the diversification of the living asteroid orders. Asteroids capable of burying themselves in sediment (and only self-buriers) share some form of channelization for the passage of water currents between the primary ossicles of the body surface. Channels in Betelgeusia indicate semi-infaunal habits similar to those of living Astropecten and Luidia. Betelgeusia represents the third semi-infaunal paxillosidan family now known from the Cretaceous, although none are known from older rocks, suggesting a broadening of the asteroid adaptive zone during the Cretaceous. The Goniasteridae, Radiasteridae, and Benthopectinidae are less important in shelf settings today than they appear to have been during Washita deposition, whereas the Astropectinidae, Luidiidae, and the Echinasteridae are absent from the Washita although they are common today in similar settings.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , May 1998 , pp. 512 - 532
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkins, W. S. 1920. The Weno and Pawpaw formations of the Texas Comanchean. University of Texas Bulletin, 1856, 172 p.Google Scholar
Adkins, W. S. 1928. Handbook of Cretaceous Fossils. University of Texas Bulletin, 2838, 385 p.Google Scholar
Adkins, W. S., and Winton, W. M. 1920. Paleontological Correlation of the Fredericksburg and Washita Formations in North Texas. University of Texas Bulletin, 1945, 128 p.Google Scholar
Birkeland, C., Chia, F.-S., and Strathmann, R. R. 1971. Development, substratum selection, delay of metamorphosis and growth in the seastar, Mediaster aequalis Stimpson. Biological Bulletin, 141:99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blainville, H. M. de. 1830. Zoophytes, Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles. F. G. Levrault, Strasbourg, 60 p.Google Scholar
Blake, D. B. 1973. Ossicle morphology of some Recent asteroids and description of some west American fossil asteroids. University of California Publications in the Geological Sciences, 104, 59 p.Google Scholar
Blake, D. B. 1984. The Benthopectinidae (Asteroidea: Echinodermata) of the Jurassic of Switzerland, Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 77:631–647.Google Scholar
Blake, D. B. 1987. A classification and phylogeny of post-Palaeozoic sea stars (Asteroidea: Echinodermata). Journal of Natural History, 21:481–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, D. B. 1988a. Paxillosidans are not primitive asteroids: A hypothesis based on functional considerations, p. 309–314. In Burke, R. D., Mladenov, P. V., Lambert, P. and Parsley, R. L. (eds.), Echinoderm Biology. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Blake, D. B. 1988b. A first fossil member of the Ctenodiscidae (Asteroidea, Echinodermata). Journal of Paleontology, 62:626–631.Google Scholar
Blake, D. B., and Aronson, R. B. 1998. Eocene stelleroids (Echinodermata) at Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Journal of Paleontology, 72:339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breton, G. 1992. Les Goniasteridae (Asteroidea, Echinodermata) jurassiques et crétacés de France: taphonomie, systématique, biostratigraphie, paléobiogéographie, évolution. Bulletin Trimestriel de la Société Géologique Normandie et Amis Muséum du Havre, Fascicule Hors Série, Supplément au Tome 78, Fascicule 4, 590 p.Google Scholar
Breton, G. 1997. Patterns and processes of heterochrony in Mesozoic goniasterid sea-stars. Lethaia, 30:135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A., and Phelps, J. 1990. The Del Rio Formation, p. 95–102. In San Antonio Student Geological Society (compilers), Cretaceous Geology North and Northwest of Del Rio, Texas. The University of Texas at San Antonio. San Antonio, Texas.Google Scholar
Clark, A. M. 1962. Asteroidea. Reports B.A.N.Z. Antarctic Research Expedition, B9, 104 p.Google Scholar
Clark, A. M. 1989. An index of names of recent Asteroidea—Pt. 1: Paxillosida and Notomyotida, p. 225–348. In Jangoux, M. and Lawrence, J. M. (eds.), Echinoderm Studies 3. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Clark, A. M., and Downey, M. E. 1992. Starfishes of the Atlantic. Chapman and Hall, London; 794 p.Google Scholar
Finsley, C. 1989. A Field Guide to Fossils of Texas. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, 189 p.Google Scholar
Fisher, W. K. 1916. Notes on the systematic position of certain genera and higher groups of starfishes. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 29:1–6.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. 1841. A History of British Starfish and Other Animals of the Class Echinodermata. John Van Voorst, London. 267 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, A. S. 1986. Goniasteridae (Asteroidea, Echinodermata) from the Late Cretaceous of north-west Europe. Pt. 1. Introduction. The genera Metopaster and Recurvaster. Mesozoi. Research, 1:1–69.Google Scholar
Gale, A. S. 1987. Goniasteridae (Asteroidea, Echinodermata) from the Late Cretaceous of north-west Europe. 2. The genera Calliderma, Crateraster, Nymphaster and Chomataster. Mesozoi. Research, 1:151–186.Google Scholar
Gislén, T. 1924. Echinoderm studies. Zoologiska Bidrag från Uppsala, 9:1–316.Google Scholar
Goldfuss, G. A. 1831. Petrefacta Germaniae, Teil 3:165–240. Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1840. A synopsis of the genera and species of the class Hypostoma (Asterias Linnaeus). Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 6:175–184, 275-290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heddle, D. 1967. Versatility of movement and origins of asteroids, p 125-141. In Millott, N. (ed.), Echinoderm Biology. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 20, 240 p.Google Scholar
Hess, H. 1972. Eine Echinodermen-Fauna aus dem mittleren Dogger des Aargauer Juras. Schweizerische Paläontologische Abhandlungen, 92, 87 p.Google Scholar
Hinote, R. E. 1978. Analysis of fossil communities in the Del Rio Formation, Upper Cretaceous, Texas. Unpublished , , 174 p.Google Scholar
Jangoux, M. 1982. Food and feeding mechanisms: Asteroidea, p. 117–160. In Jangoux, M. and Lawrence, J. M. (eds.), Echinoderm Nutrition. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
de Loriol, P. 1908. Note sur quelques stellérides du Santonien d'Abou-Roach. Bulletin de l'Institut Égyptien, Series 5, 2:169–184.Google Scholar
Lozo, F. E., and Smith, C. I. 1964. Revision of Comanche Cretaceous stratigraphic nomenclature, southern Edwards Plateau, southwest Texas. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, 14:285–306.Google Scholar
Ludwig, H. 1910. Notomyota, eine neue Ordnung der Seesterne. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 23:435–466.Google Scholar
Maluf, L. Y. 1988. Composition and distribution of the central eastern Pacific echinoderms. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles Count Technical Report, 2, 242 p.Google Scholar
Mancini, E. A. 1977. Depositional environment of the Grayson Formation (Upper Cretaceous) of Texas. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, 27:334–351.Google Scholar
Marsh, L. M., and Campbell, A. C. 1991. A new species of Ferdina (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) from the Sultanate of Oman with discussion of the relationships of the genus within the family Ophidiasteridae. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Zoology), 57:213–219.Google Scholar
Perrier, E. 1884. Mémoire sur les étoiles de mer recueillis dans la Mer des Antilles et al Golfe de Mexique. Nouvelles Archives du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 6:127–276.Google Scholar
Peyer, B. 1944. Beiträge zur Kenntnis von Rhät und Lias. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 36:303–326.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, H. W. 1950. Cretaceous Asteroidea and Ophiuroidea. Danmarks Geologiske Unders⊘gelse, II. Raekke, 77, 134 p.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, H. W. 1972. Lower Tertiary Crinoidea, Asteroidea and Ophiuroidea from Northern Europe and Greenland. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab Biologiske Skrifter 19, 7, 84 p.Google Scholar
Schulz, M.-G., and Weitschat, W. 1981. Phylogenie und Stratigraphie der Asteroideen der nordwestdeutschen Schreibkreide Teil II: Crateraster/Teichaster-Gruppe und Gattung Ophryaster. Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg, 51:27–42.Google Scholar
Scott, R. W., Fee, D., Magee, R., and Laali, H. 1978. Epeiric depositional models for the Lower Cretaceous Washita Group. Texas Bureau of Economic Geology Report of Investigations. 94, 24 p.Google Scholar
Smith, A. G., Smith, D. G. and Funnell, B. M. 1994. Atlas of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Coastlines. Cambridge University Press, 99 p.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1913. The evolution of the Cretaceous Asteroidea. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 214:99–177.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K., and Wright, C. W. 1966. Asterozoans, p. U4–U107. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. U, Echinodermata 3. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Verrill, A. E. 1870. Notes on Radiata in the Museum College. 3. On the geographical distribution of echinoderms of the Pacific coast of America. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Sciences, 1:323–351.Google Scholar
Verrill, A. E. 1894. Descriptions of new species of starfishes and ophiurans. Proceedings of the U. S. National Museum, 17:245–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walenkamp, J. H. C. 1976. The asteroids of the coastal waters of Surinam. Zoologische Verhandelingen, 147, 92 p.Google Scholar
Walenkamp, J. H. C. 1979. Asteroidea (Echinodermata) from the Guyana Shelf. Zoologische Verhandelingen, 170, 98 p.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, M. 1975. Coral-reef asteroids of Guam. Biotropica, 7:12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar