Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:27:31.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Small Fusulinids from the Pennsylvanian of Ohio

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2017

Richard D. Hoare
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio 43403
Myron T. Sturgeon
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens 45701

Abstract

Small fusulinids are common in the Atokan and most Desmoinesian marine units in Ohio but less common in Missourian and Virgilian units. Twenty-one taxa are recognized. Five new species are proposed, including Millerella? elegantula, Eostaffella? recondita, Eostaffella inusitata, Pseudostaffella douglassi, and Pseudoendothyra ohioensis. Several specimens of uncertain taxonomic assignment are also included.

Approximately one-third of the previously recognized taxa were originally described from Europe and about one-half from western North America. Millerella? carbonica Grozdilova and Lebedeva, Eostaffella rjasanensis Rauzer-Chernousova, E. mutabilis Rauzer-Chernousova, and E. acuta Grozdilova and Lebedeva are reported from North America for the first time. The known ranges of several species have been extended significantly. These conclusions support the concept of a greater cosmopolitanism of Pennsylvanian foraminifers than has been generally recognized.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1994, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, R. D. 1954. Desmoinesian fusulinids of northeastern Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Circular 31, 67 p.Google Scholar
Brady, H. B. 1869. Notes on the foraminifera of mineral veins and the adjacent strata. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, London, 39th Meeting:381382.Google Scholar
Brazhnikova, N. E. 1951. New data on the foraminiferal faunas of the western part of the Donbass Basin. Akademiya Nauk Ukrainskoi SSR, Institut Geologicheski, Trudy, Serii Stratigrafiya i Paleontologii, No. 5:73106 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Brindle, W. D. 1992. Paleobiology of Fusulinacea from the Putnam Hill Limestone Member of the Allegheny Formation (Des Moinesian, northern Appalachian Basin). Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 189 p.Google Scholar
Cassity, P. E., and Langenheim, R. L. 1966. Pennsylvanian and Permian fusulinids of the Bird Spring Group from Arrow Canyon, Clark County, Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 40:931968.Google Scholar
Chuvashov, B. I., Ivanova, R. M., and Kolchina, A. N. 1984. Upper Paleozoic deposits of the eastern slope of the Urals (stratigraphy and geologic history). Akademia Nauk SSSR, Ural'skii Nauchni Tsentr, Sverdlovsk, 231 p. [in Russian].Google Scholar
Condit, D. D. 1912. Conemaugh Formation in Ohio. Geological Survey of Ohio Bulletin 17, 363 p.Google Scholar
Conrey, G. W. 1921. Geology of Wayne County. Geological Survey of Ohio Bulletin 24, 155 p.Google Scholar
Douglass, R. C. 1987. Fusulinid biostratigraphy and correlations between the Appalachian and Eastern Interior Basins. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1451, 95 p.Google Scholar
Douglass, R. C., and Nestell, M. K. 1984. Fusulinids of the Atoka Formation, Lower–Middle Pennsylvanian, south-central Oklahoma, p. 1939. In Sutherland, P. K. and Manger, W. L. (eds.), The Atokan Series (Pennsylvanian) and its Boundaries—A Symposium. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin 136.Google Scholar
Galloway, J. J., and Harlton, B. H. 1928. Some Pennsylvanian foraminifera from Oklahoma, with special reference to the genus Orobias . Journal of Paleontology, 2:338357.Google Scholar
Galloway, J. J., and Ryniker, C. 1930. Foraminifera from the Atoka Formation of Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Circular 21, 36 p.Google Scholar
Ginkel, A. C. van. 1965. Carboniferous fusulinids from the Cantabrian Mountains (Spain). Leidse Geologische Mededelingen, 34, 225 p.Google Scholar
Ginkel, A. C. van. 1986a. Carboniferous fusulinids of the Oued el Hamar Formation (Colomb-Béchar, Algeria). Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Series B, 89:201241.Google Scholar
Ginkel, A. C. van. 1986b. Fusulinid foraminifera of Westphalian C age near the top of the Kenadza strata (Colomb-Béchar, Algeria). Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Series B, 89:313335.Google Scholar
Ginkel, A. C. van. 1987. Systematics and biostratigraphy of fusulinids of the Lena Formation (Carboniferous) near Puebla de Lillo (León, Nw Spain). Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Series B, 90:189276.Google Scholar
Groves, J. R. 1983. Calcareous foraminifers and algae from the type Morrowan (Lower Pennsylvanian) region of northeastern Oklahoma and northwestern Arkansas. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin 133, 65 p.Google Scholar
Groves, J. R. 1984a. Taxonomic, nomenclatural, and stratigraphic notes on the primitive fusulinid Pseudostraffella Thompson, 1942. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 14:6976.Google Scholar
Groves, J. R. 1984b. Foraminifers and biostratigraphy of the Arco Hills, Bluebird Mountain, and lower Snaky Canyon Formations (Mid-Carboniferous) of east-central Idaho. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 14:282302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, J. R. 1988. Calcareous foraminifers from the Bashkirian stratotype (Middle Carboniferous, south Urals) and their significance for intercontinental correlations and the evolution of the Fusulinidae. Journal of Paleontology, 62:368399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, J. R. 1991. Fusulinacean biostratigraphy of the Marble Falls Limestone (Pennsylvanian), western Llano region, central Texas. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 21:6795.Google Scholar
Groves, J. R. 1992. Stratigraphic distribution of non-fusulinacean foraminifers in the Marble Falls Limestone (Lower–Middle Pennsylvanian), western Llano Region, central Texas. Oklahoma Geological Survey Circular, 94:145161.Google Scholar
Grozdilova, L. P., and Lebedeva, N. S. 1950. New data on the Middle Carboniferous staffelloids of the western slope of the Urals. Vsesoyuznii Neftianoi Nauchno-Issledovatel'skii Geologorazvedochnii Institut (VNIGRI), Trudy, Mikrofauna SSSR, 50:546 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Harlton, B. H. 1928. Pennsylvanian foraminifera of Oklahoma and Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 1:305310.Google Scholar
Herrick, C. L. 1887. A sketch of the geological history of Licking County, accompanying an illustrated catalogue of Carboniferous fossils from Flint Ridge, Ohio. Denison University Science Laboratory Bulletin, 2:570, 144–148.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D., and Sturgeon, M. T. 1981. Foraminifera from the Washingtonville shale (Upper Desmoinesian) in the Appalachian Basin. Annual Meeting of the Geological Society of America (Cincinnati), Abstracts with Program, 13:473.Google Scholar
Ivanova, R. M. 1973. The Bashkirian Stage of the eastern slope of the south Urals. Akademia Nauk SSSR, Ural'skii Filial, Trudy Institut Geologii i Geokhimii, Sbornik po Voprosam Stratigrafii No. 15, 82:8794 [in Russian].Google Scholar
King, W. E. 1973. Fusulinids Millerella and Eostaffella from the Pennsylvanian of New Mexico and Texas. New Mexico State Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Memoir 26, 34 p.Google Scholar
King, W. E. 1984. Millerella sandersoni, a new name for Millerella extensus King, 1973. Journal of Paleontology, 58:1421.Google Scholar
Kireeva, G. D. 1949. Some new species of fusulinids from the Carboniferous limestones of the Donbass region. Geologo-Issledovatel'skii Raboty, SSSR, Glavnoe Upravlenie po Razvedkam Uglya, Trudy, 6:2555 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Lebedeva, N. S. 1966. Foraminifera from the Middle Carboniferous of northern Timan. Trudy Vsesoyuznogo Neftyanogo Nauchno-Issledovatel'skogo Geologorazvedochnogo Instituta (VNIGRI), vypusk 250, Mikrofauna SSSR, Sbornik, 14:176229 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Lee, J. S., Chen, S., and Chu, S. 1930. The Huanglung Limestone and its fauna. Academia Sinica, Memoirs of the National Research Institute of Geology, 9:85143.Google Scholar
Liem, N. V. 1974. On uncoiled and rectilinear fusulinids. Voprosy Mikropaleontologii, 17:2226 [in Russian with English summary].Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R., and Tappan, H. 1964. Sarcodina, chiefly “Theocamoebians” and Foraminiferida. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise of Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. C, Protista (2). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, 2 vols., 900 p.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R., and Tappan, H. 1987. Foraminiferal Genera and Their Classification. Von Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, 2 vols., 970 p.Google Scholar
Mamet, B. L., Mikhailoff, N., and Mortelmans, G. 1970. La stratigraphie du Tournaisien et du Viséen inférieur de Landelies. Comparison avec les coupes du Tournaisis et du bord nord du synclinal de Namur. Mémoires de la Société belge de Géologie, de Paléontologie, et d'Hydrologie, Sér. 8, No. 9, 81 p.Google Scholar
Mark, C. G. 1911. The Mercer limestone and its associated rocks in the Newark–Zanesville region. Denison University, Science Laboratory Bulletin, 16:267313.Google Scholar
Marple, M. F. 1955. Small foraminifera of the Pottsville Formation in Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science, 55:8189.Google Scholar
Marshall, F. C. 1969. Lower and Middle Pennsylvanian fusulinids from the Bird Spring Formation near Mountain Springs Pass, Clark County, Nevada. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 16:97154.Google Scholar
Mikhailov, A. V. 1939. On the characteristics of the genera of Lower Carboniferous foraminifera in the territory of the USSR. Glavnoye Geologicheskoye Upravlenie, Leningradskogo Geologicheskogo Upravlenia, 3:4761 [in Russian with English summary].Google Scholar
Möller, V. von. 1878. Die spiral-gewunden Foraminiferen des russichen Kohlenkalks. Mémoires de l'Académie Impériale des Sciences de St.-Pétersbourg, 7éme Séries, volume 25, 147 p.Google Scholar
Moore, W. L. 1964. Notes on the morphology and taxonomic position of the fusulinid Millerella marblensis Thompson. Journal of Paleontology, 38:294305.Google Scholar
Morningstar, H. 1922. Pottsville fauna of Ohio. Ohio Geological Survey Bulletin 25, 312 p.Google Scholar
Needham, C. E. 1937. Some New Mexico Fusulinidae. New Mexico School of Mines, State Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Bulletin 14, 59 p.Google Scholar
Nodine-Zeller, D. E. 1977. Microfauna from Chesterian (Mississippian) and Morrowan (Pennsylvanian) rocks in Washington County, Arkansas, and Adair and Muskogee Counties, Oklahoma, p. 89100. In Sutherland, P. K. and Manger, W. L. (eds.), Upper Chesterian–Morrowan Stratigraphy and the Mississippian–Pennsylvanian Boundary in Northeastern Oklahoma and Northwestern Arkansas. Oklahoma Geological Survey Guidebook 18.Google Scholar
Norton, C. W. 1975. Foraminiferal distribution and paleogeography of the Brush Creek marine event (Missourian: Pennsylvanian) in the Appalachian Basin. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 146 p.Google Scholar
Putrya, F. S. 1956. Stratigraphy and foraminifera of the Middle Carboniferous deposits of the greater Donbass. Vsesoyuznii Neftianoi Nauchno-Issledovatel'skii Geologorazvedochnii Institut (VNIGRI), Trudy, Mikrofauna SSSR, Sbornik 8, 98:333485 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Rauzer-Chernousova, D. M. 1948. Material and foraminiferal fauna from the Carboniferous deposits of central Kazakhstan. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy Institut Geologicheskii Nauk, Geologicheskaya Seria 21, 66:127.Google Scholar
Rauzer-Chernousova, D. M., Gryslova, N. D., Kireeva, G. D., Leontovich, G. E., Safonova, T. P., and Chernova, E. I. 1951. Middle Carboniferous fusulinids of the Russian Platform and adjacent regions. Akademyia Nauk SSSR, Institut Geologicheskii Nauk, Ministerstvo Neftianoi Promyshlennosti SSSR, Trudy, 380 p. [in Russian].Google Scholar
Rich, M. 1961. Stratigraphic section and fusulinids of the Bird Spring Formation near Lee Canyon, Clark County, Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 35:11591180.Google Scholar
Ross, C. A., and Sabins, F. F. Jr. 1965. Early and Middle Pennsylvanian fusulinids from southeast Arizona. Journal of Paleontology, 39:173209.Google Scholar
Ross, C. A., and Tyrrell, W. W. Jr. 1965. Pennsylvanian and Permian fusulinids from the Whetstone Mountains, southeast Arizona. Journal of Paleontology, 39:615635.Google Scholar
Roth, R., and Skinner, J. W. 1930. The fauna of the McCoy Formation, Pennsylvanian of Colorado. Journal of Paleontology, 4:332352.Google Scholar
Rumjanseva, Z. S. 1970. Stratigraphy and foraminifers of Namurian and lower Bashkirian deposits of the Chatkalsky Mountain system. Ministerstvo Geologii USSR, Tashkentskii Geologorazvedochni Trest, “Tashkentgeologiya” Komplesnaya Geologosbemochnaya Poiskovaya Ekspeditziya, Sbornik, 9:138184 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Skinner, J. W. 1931. Primitive fusulinids of the mid-continent region. Journal of Paleontology, 5:253259.Google Scholar
Skinner, J. W., and Wilde, G. L. 1954. New Early Pennsylvanian fusulinids from Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 28:796803.Google Scholar
Skipp, B., Baesemann, J. F., and Brenckle, P. L. 1985. A reference area for the Mississippian–Pennsylvanian (Mid-Carboniferous) boundary in east-central Idaho, U.S.A. Dixième Congrès International de Stratigraphie et de Géologie du Geologie du Carbonifere, Madrid, 1983, C. R., 4:403428.Google Scholar
Slade, M. L. 1961. Pennsylvanian and Permian fusulinids of the Ferguson Mountain area, Elko County, Nevada. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 8:5592.Google Scholar
Smyth, P. 1957. Fusulinids from the Pennsylvanian rocks of Ohio. The Ohio Journal of Science, 57:257283.Google Scholar
Smyth, P. 1974. Fusulinids from the Appalachian Basin. Journal of Paleontology, 48:856858.Google Scholar
Staff, H. von. 1912. Monographie der Fusulinen. Teil III; Die Fusulinen (Schellwienien) Nordamerikas. Palaeontographica, 59:157191.Google Scholar
St. Jean, J. Jr. 1957. A Middle Pennsylvanian foraminiferal fauna from Dubois County, Indiana. Indiana Department of Conservation, Geological Survey Bulletin 10, 66 p.Google Scholar
Stout, W. 1918. Geology of Muskingum County. Ohio Geological Survey Bulletin 21, 351 p.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. L. 1935a. The fusulinid genus Staffella in America. Journal of Paleontology, 9:111120.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. L. 1935b. Fusulinids from the Lower Pennsylvanian Atoka and Boggy Formations of Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology, 9:291306.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. L. 1936. Pennsylvanian fusulinids from Ohio. Journal of Paleontology, 10:673683.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. L. 1937. Fusulinids of the subfamily Schubertellinae. Journal of Paleontology, 11:118125.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. L. 1942. New genera of Pennsylvanian fusulinids. American Journal of Science, 240:403420.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. L. 1944. Pennsylvanian Morrowan rocks and fusulinids of Kansas. State Geological Survey of Kansas Bulletin 52, Pt. 7:411431.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. L. 1947. Stratigraphy and fusulinids of pre-Desmoinesian Pennsylvanian rocks, Llano Uplift, Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 21:147164.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. L. 1948. Studies of American fusulinids. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Protozoa, Article 1, 184 p.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. L. 1951. New genera of fusulinid foraminifera. Contributions from the Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, 2:115119.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. L., Shaver, R. H., and Riggs, E. A. 1959. Early Pennsylvanian fusulinids and ostracods of the Illinois Basin. Journal of Paleontology, 33:770792.Google Scholar
de Verneuil, E. 1846. On the Fusulina in the Coal formation of Ohio. American Journal of Science, 2:293.Google Scholar
de Verneuil, E. 1847. Note sur le parallélisme des roches des dépots paléozoiques de l'Amérique Septentrionale avec ceux de l'Europe, etc. Société Géologique de France Bulletin, 4:646710.Google Scholar
Verville, G. J., and Sanderson, G. A. 1988. Early Atokan fusulinids from the lower Antler overlap sequence, Lander and Humbolt Counties, Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 62:520529.Google Scholar