Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:51:30.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shape Analysis of Frasnian Species of the Late Devonian Conodont Genus Palmatolepis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2017

Gilbert Klapper  and
C. T. Foster Jr.
Gilbert Klapper
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242
C. T. Foster Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Multielement taxonomy and shape analysis have led to substantial revisions in the taxonomic concepts of 13 Frasnian species of Palmatolepis, which previously have been based largely on visual discrimination of the Pa elements. Septimembrate apparatuses have been recognized in three species and diagnostic Pb elements are associated with the Pa elements of eight others. The multielement reconstructions thus derived provide the a priori classification that is tested by the canonical variate analysis of the outlines of the Pa elements. The outlines are digitized from a TV image and quantified by calculating mean tangent angles within a specified number of intervals between landmarks. The mean tangent angles for each interval are the variables used in the canonical variate analysis. In a series of comparisons limited to three species each, all 13 species separate into isolated clusters that are completely congruent with the a priori groups based, with two exceptions, on multielement taxonomy. Thus, shape analysis provides a rigorous separation of closely similar species that have been difficult to distinguish by visual discrimination of the Pa elements. Shape analysis is treated herein as an integral part of the systematic descriptions. Newly described species are P. bohemica, P. boogaardi, P. luscarensis, and P. muelleri. The new taxonomic concepts lead to significant revisions in the biostratigraphic ranges of a number of species of Palmatolepis involved in the zonation and graphic correlation of the Frasnian Stage.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 67 , Issue S32: The Paleontological Society Memoir 32: Shape Analysis of Frasnian Species of the Late Devonian Conodont Genus Palmatolepis , July 1993 , pp. 1 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © 1993, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, W. I. 1966. Upper Devonian conodonts and the Devonian–Mississippian boundary of north-central Iowa. Journal of Paleontology, 40:395–415.Google Scholar
Austin, R. L., Orchard, M. J., and Stewart, I. J. 1985. Conodonts of the Devonian System from Great Britain, p. 93–166. In Higgins, A. C. and Austin, R. L. (eds.), A Stratigraphical Index of Conodonts. Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, West Sussex.Google Scholar
Balinski, A. 1979. Brachiopods and conodonts from the Frasnian of the Debnik Anticline, southern Poland. Palaeontologia Polonica, 39:3–95.Google Scholar
Barnett, S. G. 1970. A new stage for orienting microfossils. Journal of Paleontology, 44:1133–1134.Google Scholar
Barskov, I. S., Alekseev, A. S., Kononova, L. I., and Migdisova, A. V. 1987. Opredelitel' Konodontov Verkhnego Devona i Karbona. Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta, Geologicheskiy Fakul'tet, 144 p.Google Scholar
Becker, R. T., Feist, R., Flajs, G., House, M. R., and Klapper, G. 1989. Frasnian–Famennian extinction events in the Devonian at Coumiac, southern France. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris, 309(II):259–266.Google Scholar
Becker, R. T., House, M. R., Kirchgasser, W. T., and Playford, P. E. 1991. Sedimentary and faunal changes across the Frasnian/Famennian boundary in the Canning Basin of Western Asutralia. Historical Biology, 5:183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, R. T., House, M. R., Kirchgasser, W. T., and Playford, P. E. 1992. Devonian goniatite biostratigraphy and timing of facies movements in the Frasnian of the Canning Basin, Western Australia. Geological Society of London, Special Publication 70:293–321.Google Scholar
Belka, Z., and Wendt, J. 1992. Conodont biofacies patterns in the Kellwasser Facies (upper Frasnian/lower Famennian) of the eastern Anti-Atlas, Morocco. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 91:143–173.Google Scholar
Bischoff, G. 1956. Oberdevonische Conodonten (tol δ) aus dem Rheinischen Schiefergebirge. Notizblatt des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung, 84:115–137.Google Scholar
Bischoff, G. and Sannemann, D. 1958. Unterdevonische Conodonten aus dem Frankenwald. Notizblatt des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung, 86:87–110.Google Scholar
Bischoff, G. and Ziegler, W. 1957. Die Conodontenchronologie des Mitteldevons und des tiefsten Oberdevons. Abhandlungen des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung, 22, 136 p.Google Scholar
van den Boogaard, M., and Kuhry, B. 1979. Statistical reconstruction of the Palmatolepis apparatus (Late Devonian conodontophorids) at the generic, subgeneric, and specific level. Scripta Geologica, 49, 57 p.Google Scholar
Branson, E. B., and Mehl, M. G. 1933. A study of Hinde's types of conodonts preserved in the British Museum. The University of Missouri Studies, 8:133–156, 165–167.Google Scholar
Druce, E. C. 1976. Conodont biostratigraphy of the Upper Devonian Reef Complexes of the Canning Basin, Western Australia. Australia Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, Bulletin 158, 303 p.Google Scholar
Dusar, M., and Dreesen, R. 1985. Stratigraphy of the upper Frasnian and Famennian deposits in the region of Hamoir-sur-Ourthe (Dinant Synclinorium, Belgium). Belgian Geological Survey Professional Paper 209, 55 p.Google Scholar
Dzik, J. 1991. Evolution of oral apparatuses in the conodont chordates. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 36:265–323.Google Scholar
Feist, R., and Klapper, G. 1985. Stratigraphy and conodonts in pelagic sequences across the Middle–Upper Devonian boundary, Montagne Noire, France. Palaeontographica, Abteilung A, 188:1–18.Google Scholar
Fuchs, A. 1987. Conodont biostratigraphy of the Elbingerode Reef Complex, Harz Mountains. Acta Geologica Polonica, 37:33–50.Google Scholar
Glenister, B. F., and Klapper, G. 1966. Upper Devonian conodonts from the Canning Basin, Western Australia. Journal of Paleontology, 40:777–842.Google Scholar
Han, Y. 1987. Study on Upper Devonian Frasnian/Famennian boundary in Maanshan, Zhongping, Xiangzhou, Guangxi. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, 17:171–194.Google Scholar
Hass, W. H. 1956. Age and correlation of the Chattanooga Shale and the Maury Formation. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 286, 47 p.Google Scholar
Hass, W. H. 1959. Conodonts from the Chappel Limestone of Texas. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 294-J:365–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinde, G. J. 1879. On conodonts from the Chazy and Cincinnati Group of the Cambro-Silurian, and from the Hamilton and Genesee-Shale divisions of the Devonian, in Canada and the United States. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 35:351–369.Google Scholar
House, M. R., Kirchgasser, W. T., Price, J. D., and Wade, G. 1985. Goniatites from Frasnian (Upper Devonian) and adjacent strata of the Montagne Noire. Hercynica, 1:1–21.Google Scholar
House, M. R., and Price, J. D. 1985. New Late Devonian genera and species of tornoceratid goniatites. Palaeontology, 28:159–188.Google Scholar
Huddle, J. W. 1968. Redescription of Upper Devonian conodont genera and species proposed by Ulrich and Bassler in 1926. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 578, 55 p.Google Scholar
Irwin, S. E. B., and Orchard, M. J. 1991. Upper Devonian–Lower Carboniferous conodont biostratigraphy of the Earn Group and overlying units, northern Canadian Cordillera, p. 185–213. In Orchard, M. J. and McCracken, A. D. (eds.), Ordovician to Triassic Conodont Paleontology of the Canadian Cordillera. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 417.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. G., and Klapper, G. 1992. North American Midcontinent Devonian T–R cycles. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin 145:127–135.Google Scholar
Klapper, G. 1989. The Montagne Noire Frasnian (Upper Devonian) conodont succession, p. 449–468. In McMillan, N. J., Embry, A. F., and Glass, D. J. (eds.), Devonian of the World. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 14, volume III (imprint 1988).Google Scholar
Klapper, G. 1990. Frasnian species of the Late Devonian conodont genus Ancyrognathus . Journal of Paleontology, 64:998–1025.Google Scholar
Klapper, G. 1991. Multielement species-level taxonomy of Palmatolepis (Late Devonian, Frasnian). Program and abstracts of the Canadian Paleontology Conference I and Pander Society Meeting, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, August 1991:43.Google Scholar
Klapper, G., and Foster, C. T. Jr. 1986. Quantification of outlines in Frasnian (Upper Devonian) platform conodonts. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 23:1214–1222.Google Scholar
Klapper, G., and Foster, C. T. Jr. 1987. Outline analysis of platform conodonts. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 19(7):728.Google Scholar
Klapper, G., and Foster, C. T. Jr. 1991. Outline analysis of Late Devonian conodonts. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 23(5):A279.Google Scholar
Klapper, G., and Furnish, W. M. 1963. Conodont zonation of the early Upper Devonian in eastern Iowa. Iowa Academy of Science Proceedings, 69:400–410 (imprint 1962).Google Scholar
Klapper, G., and Lane, H. R. 1985. Upper Devonian (Frasnian) conodonts of the Polygnathus biofacies, N.W.T., Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 59:904–951.Google Scholar
Klapper, G., and Lane, H. R. 1989. Frasnian (Upper Devonian) conodont sequence at Luscar Mountain and Mount Haultain, Alberta Rocky Mountains, p. 469–478. In McMillan, N. J., Embry, A. F., and Glass, D. J. (eds.), Devonian of the World. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 14, volume III (imprint 1988).Google Scholar
Klapper, G., and Philip, G. M. 1971. Devonian conodont apparatuses and their vicarious skeletal elements. Lethaia, 4:429–452.Google Scholar
Klapper, G., and Philip, G. M. 1972. Familial classification of reconstructed Devonian conodont apparatuses, p. 97–114. In Lindström, M. and Ziegler, W. (eds.), Symposium on Conodont Taxonomy. Geologica et Palaeontologica, Special Volume 1.Google Scholar
Kuz'min, A. V., and Melnikova, L. I. 1991. Raschlenenie po konodontam Franskikh i nizhnefamenskikh otlozheniy yuzhnoy chasti Khoreyverskoy vpadiny (Timano-Pechorskaya provintsiya). Byulleten' Moskovskogo Obshchestva Ispytateley Prirody, otdel geologicheskiy, 66:62–72.Google Scholar
Lane, H. R. 1968. Symmetry in conodont element-pairs. Journal of Paleontology, 42:1258–1263.Google Scholar
Lange, F.-G. 1968. Conodonten-Gruppenfunde aus Kalken des tieferen Oberdevon. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 2:37–57.Google Scholar
Lohmann, G. P. 1983. Eigenshape analysis of microfossils: a general morphometric procedure for describing changes in shape. Mathematical Geology, 15:659–672.Google Scholar
MacLeod, N. 1991. Extensions of the Eigenshape technique to incorporate landmarks and analyze non-closed curves. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 23(5):A472.Google Scholar
Miller, A. K., and Youngquist, W. 1947. Conodonts from the type section of the Sweetland Creek Shale in Iowa. Journal of Paleontology, 21:501–517.Google Scholar
Mound, M. C. 1968. Upper Devonian conodonts from southern Alberta. Journal of Paleontology, 42:444–524.Google Scholar
Mouravieff, A. N. 1970. Conodontes du Frasnien de la Belgique: Biostratigraphie et aspects écologiques. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Catholique de Louvain, 141 p.Google Scholar
Mouravieff, A. N. 1982. Conodont stratigraphic scheme of the Frasnian of the Ardennes, p. 101–118. In Bigey, F. et al., Papers on the Frasnian–Givetian Boundary. Geological Survey of Belgium, Brussels.Google Scholar
Müller, K. J. 1956. Zur Kenntnis der Conodonten-Fauna des europäischen Devons, 1. Die Gattung Palmatolepis . Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, 494:1–70.Google Scholar
Müller, K. J., and Müller, E. M. 1957. Early Upper Devonian (Independence) conodonts from Iowa, part 1. Journal of Paleontology, 31:1069–1108.Google Scholar
Narkiewicz, M. 1978. Stratigraphy and facies development of the Upper Devonian in the Olkusz-Zawiercie Area, southern Poland. Acta Geologica Polonica, 28:415–470.Google Scholar
Nicoll, R. S. 1985. Multielement composition of the conodont species Polygnathus xylus xylus Stauffer, 1940 and Ozarkodina brevis (Bischoff and Ziegler, 1957) from the Upper Devonian of the Canning Basin, Western Australia. Bureau of Mineral Resources Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics, 9:133–147.Google Scholar
Orchard, M. J. 1989. Conodonts from the Frasnian–Famennian boundary interval in western Canada, p. 35–52. In McMillan, N. J., Embry, A. F., and Glass, D. J. (eds.), Devonian of the World. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 14, volume III (imprint 1988).Google Scholar
Orr, R. W., and Klapper, G. 1968. Two new conodont species from Middle–Upper Devonian boundary beds of Indiana and New York. Journal of Paleontology, 42:1066–1075.Google Scholar
Ovnatanova, N. S. 1976. Novye pozdnedevonskie konodonty Russkoy Platformy. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, 1976(2):106–115.Google Scholar
Ovnatanova, N. S., and Kuz'min, A. V. 1991. Konodonty tipovykh razrezov Domanikovoy svity na yuzhnom Timane. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Seriya Geologicheskaya, 1991(3):37–50.Google Scholar
Pollock, C. A. 1968. Lower Upper Devonian conodonts from Alberta, Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 42:415–443.Google Scholar
Puchkov, V. N., Klapper, G., and Mashkova, T. V. 1982. Natural assemblages of Palmatolepis from the Upper Devonian of the northern Urals. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 26:281–298 (imprint 1981).Google Scholar
Savage, N. M. 1992. Late Devonian (Frasnian and Famennian) conodonts from the Wadleigh Limestone, southeastern Alaska. Journal of Paleontology, 66:277–292.Google Scholar
Schindler, E. 1990. Die Kellwasser-Krise (hohe Frasne–Stufe, Ober-Devon). Göttinger Arbeiten zur Geologie und Paläontologie, 46, 115 p.Google Scholar
Schumacher, D. 1971. Conodonts and biostratigraphy of the “Kenwood” Shale (Upper Devonian), p. 68–77, 100–107, 143–151. In Clark, D. L. (ed.), Conodonts and biostratigraphy of the Wisconsin Paleozoic. Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, Information Circular 19.Google Scholar
Seddon, G. 1970. Pre-Chappel conodonts of the Llano Region, Texas. Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin, Report of Investigations 68, 130 p.Google Scholar
Selwood, E. B., Edwards, R. A., Simpson, S., Chesher, J. A., Hamblin, R. J. O., Henson, M. R., Riddolls, B. W., and Walters, R. A. 1984. Geology of the country around Newton Abbot. British Geological Survey, England and Wales, Memoir for 1:50,000 geological sheet 339, New Series, 212 p.Google Scholar
Stauffer, C. R. 1938. Conodonts of the Olentangy Shale. Journal of Paleontology, 12:411–443.Google Scholar
Sweet, W. C. 1988. The Conodonta: Morphology, Taxonomy, Paleoecology, and Evolutionary History of a Long-Extinct Animal Phylum. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 212 p.Google Scholar
Szulczewski, M. 1971. Upper Devonian conodonts, stratigraphy and facial development in the Holy Cross Mts. Acta Geologica Polonica, 21:1–129.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O., and Bassler, R. S. 1926. A classification of the toothlike fossils, conodonts, with descriptions of American Devonian and Mississippian species. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, 68(12): 63 p.Google Scholar
Waldman, J. L. 1990. Stratigraphy and depositional environments of the Upper Devonian Fenstermaker Limestone, Eureka County, Nevada. , Oregon State University, Corvallis, 159 p.Google Scholar
Winder, C. G. 1966. Conodont zones and stratigraphic variability in Upper Devonian rocks, Ontario. Journal of Paleontology, 40:1275–1293.Google Scholar
Youngquist, W. 1945. Upper Devonian conodonts from the Independence Shale (?) of Iowa. Journal of Paleontology, 19:355–367.Google Scholar
Youngquist, W. 1947. A new Upper Devonian conodont fauna from Iowa. Journal of Paleontology, 21:95–112.Google Scholar
Youngquist, W., and Miller, A. K. 1948. Additional conodonts from the Sweetland Creek Shale of Iowa. Journal of Paleontology, 22:440–450.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. 1958. Conodontenfeinstratigraphische Untersuchungen an der Grenze Mitteldevon/Oberdevon und in der Adorfstufe. Notizblatt des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung, 87:7–77.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. 1962. Taxionomie und Phylogenie Oberdevonischer Conodonten und ihre stratigraphische Bedeutung. Abhandlungen des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung, 38, 166 p.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. 1971a. Conodont stratigraphy of the European Devonian, p. 227–284. In Sweet, W. C. and Bergström, S. M. (eds.), Symposium on Conodont Biostratigraphy. Geological Society of America Memoir 127.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. 1971b. A field trip guidebook; post-symposium excursion, Sept. 15–18, 1971 to Rhenish Slate Mountains and Hartz Mountains. Philipps-University of Marburg, Symposium on Conodont Taxonomy, 47 p.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. 1973. Palmatolepis hassi, P. punctata , p. 281–282, 291–293. In Ziegler, W. (ed.), Catalogue of Conodonts, I. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W., and Sandberg, C. A. 1990. The Late Devonian standard conodont zonation. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 121, 115 p.Google Scholar