Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:35:20.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rossella bromleyi n. sp.: The first entirely preserved fossil sponge species of the genus Rossella (Hexactinellida) from the Upper Cretaceous of Bornholm, Denmark

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Anke Brückner  and
Dorte Janussen
Anke Brückner
Affiliation:
FU Berlin, Institut für Geologische Wissenschaften, Paläontologie, Malteserstr. 74-100, Haus D, D-12249 Berlin, Germany,
Dorte Janussen
Affiliation:
Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum Senckenberg, Sektion Marine Evertebraten I, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt/M., Germany,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new lyssacinosan hexactinellid, Rossella bromleyi n. sp., is described from the Upper Cretaceous of Arnager Pynt, Bornholm (Denmark). The sponge shows a cup-shaped form with a broad, moderately dense root tuft, which contains three- and four-rayed orthotropal anchors characteristic for Rossella. The skeleton is composed of bundles of diactines, hexactines of two orders, and pentactines. Diactine bundles are mainly in the growth direction or diagonal to it. Prostalia lateralia are pentactines with the paratangential rays protruding beyond the outer surface of the sponge body. Hypodermalia are absent.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 79 , Issue 1 , January 2005 , pp. 21 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barthel, D., and Tendal, O. S. 1994. Antarctic Hexactinellida, p. 154. In Wägele, J. W. and Sieg, J. (eds.), Synopsis of the Antarctic Benthos, 6. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein.Google Scholar
Bodzioch, A. 1994. Paleoecology of hexactinellid sponges from the epicontinental Triassic of Poland, p. 35–44. In van Soest, R., van Kempen, T., and Braekman, J. C. (eds.), Sponges in Time and Space. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Bowerbank, J. S. 1869a. A monograph of the siliceo-fibrous sponges. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1869(1):66–100.Google Scholar
Bowerbank, J. S. 1869b. A monograph of the siliceo-fibrous sponges. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1869(2):323–351.Google Scholar
Bromley, R. 1979. Field meeting in southern Scandinavia, 18–28 September 1975. Proceedings of the Geological Association, 90:181–191.Google Scholar
Brongniart, A. 1828. Histoire des végétaux fossiles, ou recherches botaniques et géologiques sur les végétaux renfermés dans les diverses couches du globe. Dufour, G. and d'Ocagne, E., Paris, 488 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brückner, A., Janussen, D., and Schneider, S. 2003. Eine neue Poriferen-Fauna aus dem Septarienton (Oligozän, Rupelium) von Bad Freienwalde (NE-Deutschland) und der erste fossil erhaltene Vertreter der nicht-rigiden Hexactinelliden-Gattung Asconema. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 77(2):263–280.Google Scholar
Burton, M. 1929. Porifera, Part II, Antarctic sponges, British Antarctic (“Terra Nova”) Expedition 1910. Zoology, 6(4):393–423.Google Scholar
Burton, M. 1932. Sponges. Discovery Reports, 6:237–392.Google Scholar
Carter, H. J. 1872. On two new sponges from the Antarctic Sea, and on a new species of Tethya from Shetland; together with observations on the reproduction of sponges commencing from zygosis of the sponge-animal. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 9:409–435.Google Scholar
Christensen, W. K. 1985. The Albian to Maastrichtian of southern Sweden and Bornholm, Denmark: a review. Cretaceous Research, 5:313–327.Google Scholar
Du Dresnay, R., Termier, G., and Termier, H. 1978. Les hexactinellides (lyssakides et dictyonines) du Lias Marocain. Géobios, 11(3):269–295.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 1960. Late Paleozoic sponge faunas of the Texas region. The siliceous sponges. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 120:1–160.Google Scholar
Gehling, J. G., and Rigby, J. K. 1996. Long expected sponges from the Neoproterozoic Ediacara fauna of South Australia. Journal of Paleontology, 70(2):185–195.Google Scholar
Gravesen, P., Rolle, F., and Suklyk, F. 1982. Lithostratigraphy and sedimentary evolution of the Triassic, Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous of Bornholm, Denmark. Geological Survey of Denmark, B7:1–51.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1872. Classification of sponges. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 4(IX):458.Google Scholar
Gry, H. 1960. Geology of Bornholm. Guide to excursions Nos. A45 and C40. International Geological Congress, 21 Session, Norden, 16 p.Google Scholar
Jørgart, T., and Nielsen, A. T. 1995. Geology of the island Bornholm (Denmark), p. 115–135. In Katzung, G., Hunke, H., and Obst, K. (eds.), Geologie des südlichen Ostseeraumes: Umwelt und Geologie. Exkursionsführer zur 147. Hauptversammlung der Geologischen Gesellschaft, Terra Nostra, 95(6).Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., and Christensen, W. K. 1991. Coniacian and Santonian ammonites from Bornholm, Denmark. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, 38:206–226.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, R. 1907. Porifera Hexactinellida. National Antarctic Expedition (S.S. ‘Discovery’) 1901–1904. Natural History, III:1–25.Google Scholar
Kling, S. A., and Reif, W.-E. 1969. The Paleozoic history of amphidisc and hemidisc sponges: new evidence from the Carboniferous of Uruguay. Journal of Paleontology, 43(6):1429–1434.Google Scholar
Kott, R., and Wuttke, M. 1987. Untersuchungen zur Morphologie, Paläokologie und Taphonomie von Retifungus rudens Rietschel 1970 aus dem Hunsrückschiefer (Bundesrepublik Deutschland). Geologisches Jahrbuch von Hessen, 115:11–27.Google Scholar
Mehl, D. 1992. Die Entwicklung der Hexactinellida seit dem Mesozoikum. Paläobiologie, Phylogenie und Evolutionsökologie. Berliner geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, E2:1–164.Google Scholar
Mehl, D., and Erdtmann, B.-W. 1994. Sanshapentella dapingi n. gen., n. sp.—a new hexactinellid sponge from the Early Cambrian (Tommotian) of China. Berliner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, E13:315–318.Google Scholar
Mehl, D., and Hauschke, N. 1995. Hyalonema cretacea n. sp., erste körperlich erhaltene Amphidiscophora (Porifera, Hexactinellida) aus dem Mesozoikum. Geologie und Paläontologie in Westfalen, 38:89–97.Google Scholar
Mehl, D., and Mostler, H. 1993. Neue Spicula aus dem Karbon und Perm: Konsequenzen für die Evolutionsökologie der Hexactinellida (Porifera), Strategien ihrer Gerüstbildung im Spätpaläozoikum und frühen Mesozoikum. Geologisch-Paläontologische Mitteilungen Innsbruck, 19:1–28.Google Scholar
Mehl, D., Wuttke, M., and Kott, R. 1997. Beiträge zur Spongien-Fauna des Hunsrückschiefers (II) Beschreibung eines neuen Kieselschwammes (Hexactinellida, “Rossellimorpha,” fam., gen. et sp. indet). Neues Jahrbuch für Paläontologie, Monatshefte, 1997(2):79–92.Google Scholar
Mostler, H. 1989. Mikroskleren hexactinellider Schwämme aus dem Lias der Nördlichen Kalkalpen. Jahrbuch der Geologischen Bundes-Anstalt, 132(4):687–700.Google Scholar
Mostler, H., and Mosleh-Yazdi, A. 1976. Neue Poriferen aus den oberkambrischen Gesteinen der Milaformation im Elburzgebirge (Iran). Geologisch-Paläontologische Mitteilungen Innsbruck, 5(1):1–36.Google Scholar
Noe-Nygaard, N., and Surlyk, F. 1985. Mound bedding in a sponge-rich Coniacian chalk, Bornholm, Denmark. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, 34:237–249.Google Scholar
Pickett, J., and Rigby, K. 1983. Sponges from the Early Devonian Garra Formation, New South Wales. Journal of Paleontology, 57(4):720–741.Google Scholar
Pisera, A., and Bodzioch, A. 1991. Middle Triassic lychniscosan sponges from Upper Silesia (southern Poland), and the history of hexactinosan and lychniscosan sponges. Acta Geologica Polonica, 41(3–4):192–207.Google Scholar
Pisera, A., and Busquets, P. 2002. Eocene siliceous sponges from the Ebro Basin (Catalonia, Spain). Geobios, 35:321–346.Google Scholar
Pisera, A., Rigby, J. K., and Bylund, K. G. 1996. Lower Triassic hexactinellid sponges from the Confusion Range, Western Utah. Brigham Young University Geological Studies, 41:139–148.Google Scholar
Ravn, J. P. J. 1918. Kridtaflejringerne paa Bornhols sydvestkyst og deeeres fauna. II Turonet. Danmarks Geologiske Undersoegelse II Reihe, 37:7–37.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H. 1964. Upper Cretaceous Hexactinellida of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Part IV (1964). Palaeontographical Society, 1963:xlix–cliv.Google Scholar
Reitner, J., and Wörheide, G. 2002. Non-lithistid fossil Demospongiae—origins of their palaeobiodiversity and highlights in history of preservation, p. 52–70. In Hopper, J., van Soest, R. W., and Willenz, P. (eds.), Systema Porifera. A Guide to the Classification of Sponges. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1966. Protospongia hicksi Hinde from the Middle Cambrian of western Utah. Journal of Paleontology, 40:549–554.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1981. The sponge fauna of the Eocene Castle Hayne Limestone from east-central North Carolina. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 16:123–144.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1983. Sponges of the Middle Cambrian Marjum Limestone from the House Range and Drum Mountains of western Millard County, Utah. Journal of Paleontology, 57:240–270.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1986. Sponges of the Burgess Shale (Middle Cambrian) British Columbia. Palaeontographica Canada, 2:1–105.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., and Gosney, T. C. 1983. First reported Triassic lyssacid sponges from North America. Journal of Paleontology, 57(4):787–796.Google Scholar
Salomon, D. 1990. Ein neuer lyssakiner Kieselschwamm, Regadrella leptotoichica (Hexasterophora, Hexactinellida) aus dem Untercenoman von Baddeckenstedt (Nordwestdeutschland). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Monatshefte, 1990(6):342–352.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O. 1870. Grundzüge einer Spongien-Fauna des Atlantischen Gebietes. Gustav Fischer, Leipzig, 88 p.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O. 1880. Die Spongien des Meerbusen von Mexico (und des Caraibischen Meeres). Zweites (Schluss-) Heft. Gustav Fischer, Jena, 66 p.Google Scholar
Schrammen, A. 1912. Die Kieselspongien der oberen Kreide von Nordwestdeutschland. Palaeontographica, 4:281–385.Google Scholar
Schulze, F. E. 1897. Revision des Systems der Asconematiden und Rosselliden. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1:520–558.Google Scholar
Schulze, F. E., and Kirkpatrick, R. 1910. Die Hexactinelliden der deutschen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903. “Deutsche Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903,” XII. Zoologie, IV:1–61.Google Scholar
Steiner, M., Mehl, D., Reitner, J., and Erdtmann, B.-D. 1993. Oldest entirely preserved sponges and other fossils from the lowermost Cambrian and a new facies reconstruction of the Yangtze Platform (China). Berliner geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, E9:293–329.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, K. R. 2002. Order Lyssacinosida. Family Rossellidae, p. 1441–1505. In Hopper, J., van Soest, R. W., and Willenz, P. (eds.), Systema Porifera. A Guide to the Classification of Sponges. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Topsent, E. 1901. Notice préeliminaire dur les éponges recueilles par l'Expedition antarctique belge. Archives de Zoologie expérimentale et générale, notes et revue, 1 (1901):1–11.Google Scholar
Topsent, E. 1915. Une Rossella des Acores (Rossella nodastrella n.sp.). Bulletin de l'Institut Océanographique de Monaco, 303:1–6.Google Scholar
Topsent, E. 1916. Diagnoses d'eponges recueillies dans l'Antarctique par le Pourquoi-Pas? Bulletin du Muséum national d'Historie naturelle, 22(3):163–172.Google Scholar
Topsent, E. 1917. Spongiaires. In Joubin, L. (ed.), Deuxième Expédition Antarctique Française (1908–1910) Commandée par le Dr. Jean Charcot. Sciences Physiques: Documents Scientifiques Paris. Masson & Cie, Paris, 88 p.Google Scholar
Topsent, E. 1928. Spongiaires de l'Atlantique et de la Méditerranée provenant des croisières du Prince Albert ler de Monaco. Résultats des Campagnes Scientifiques du Prince Monaco. Imprimerie de Monaco, LXXIV:1–376.Google Scholar
Tröger, K.-A., and Christensen, W. K. 1991. Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian–Santonian) inoceramid bivalve faunas from the island of Bornholm, Denmark. Danmarks Geologiske Undersøgelse, A28:7–45.Google Scholar
von Zittel, K. A. 1877. Studien ueber fossile Spongien; 1 Abteilung, Hexactinellidae. Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-Physikalischen Klasse der königlichen Bayrischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 13(1):1–63.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1920. Middle Cambrian Spongiae. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collection, 67:261–364.Google Scholar