Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:53:06.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Replacement name for Tetradium Dana, 1846

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

H. Miriam Steele-Petrovich
H. Miriam Steele-Petrovich*
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, University of Tulsa, 600 South College Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74104-3189, USA,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It was shown recently that Tetradium Dana, 1846 (type species: Tetradium fibratum Safford, 1856), a common Middle and Upper Ordovician fossil, is a calcareous filamentous florideophyte alga (Phylum Rhodophyta) (Steele-Petrovich, 2009a, 2009b), and not a tabulate coral or a chaetetid sponge, as traditionally classified. Reassigning Tetradium Dana from an animal to an alga subjects it to the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (ICBN) (McNeill et al., 2006), which makes it a later homonym of Tetradium Loureiro, 1790 (see Farr et al., 1979), a Recent tree of the citrus family (Rutaceae). According to the ICBN (Articles 14, 53.1, 54.1), the name Tetradium Dana cannot be conserved and must be replaced, since Tetradium Loureiro is currently in use.

Type
Taxonomic Note
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 85 , Issue 4 , July 2011 , pp. 802 - 803
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bassler, R. S. 1950. Faunal lists and descriptions of Paleozoic corals. Memoir of the Geological Society of America, 44:1–315.Google Scholar
Cronquist, A. 1960. The divisions and classes of plants. Botanical Reviews, 26:425–482.Google Scholar
Dana, J. D. 1846. Structure and classification of zoophytes: narrative of the United States exploring expedition during the years 1838, 1839, 1840, 1841, 1842 under the command of Charles Wilkes, U.S.N., Vol. 7. G.P. Putnam, Philadelphia, 740 p.Google Scholar
Farr, E. R., Leussink, J. A., and Stafleu, F. A. (Eds). 1979. Index Nominum Genericorum (Plantarum). Vol. 3, p. 1737. Bohn, Scheltema, and Holkema, Utrecht.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1847. Palaeontology of New York. Vol. I. Containing descriptions of the organic remains of the lower division of the New-York system. Van Benthuysen, Albany, New York, 338 p., 33 pls. Google Scholar
Häntzschel, W. 1975. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, Part W, Miscellanea: Supplement 1, trace fossils and problematica. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, 269 p.Google Scholar
Hill, D. 1981. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, Part F, Coelenterata: Supplement 1, rugosa and tabulata, Vol. 2. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, 762 p.Google Scholar
Loureiro, J. de. 1790. Flora cochinchinensis. Two volumes, Royal Academy of Sciences, Lisbon, 745 p.Google Scholar
McNeill, J., Barrie, F. R., Burdet, H. M., Demoulin, V., Hawksworth, D. L., Marhold, K., Nicolson, D. H., Prado, J., Silva, P. C., Skog, J. E., Wiersema, J. H. and Turland, N. J. 2006. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Vienna Code). Electronic version (http://ibot.sav.sk/icbn/main.htm).Google Scholar
Nicholson, H. A. 1879. On the structure and affinities of the “tabulate corals” of the Palaeozoic Period with critical description of illustrative species. William Blackwood, Edinburgh and London, 342 p. 15 pls. Google Scholar
Okulitch, V. J. 1935. Tetradidae—a revision of the genus Tetradium . Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada (Section IV), 29:49–74.Google Scholar
Okulitch, V. J. 1936. On the genera Heliolites, Tetradium, and Chaetetes . American Journal of Science, 32:361–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1931. Notes on invertebrate fossils with descriptions of new species. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Geology Series, 55:165–213, pl. 4.Google Scholar
Ruedemann, R. 1898. On the development of Tetradium cellulosum Hall, sp. American Geologist, 22:16–25.Google Scholar
Safford, J. M. 1856. Remarks on the genus Tetradium, with notices of the species found in Middle Tennessee. American Journal of Science, Series 2, 22:236–238.Google Scholar
Saunders, G. W. and Hommersand, M. H. 2004. Assessing red algal supraordinal diversity and taxonomy in the context of contemporary systematic data. American Journal of Botany, 91:1494–1507.Google Scholar
Sokolov, B. S. 1955. Palaeozoic tabulates of the European part of U.S.S.R. Vol. 1, Introduction: General problems of systematics and evolution of the tabulates. Trudy Vsesoyuznogo Neftyanogo Nauchno-Issledovatel'skogo Geologo-Razvedochnogo Instituta (VNIGRI). Novaya Seriya, 85:1–527. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Steele-Petrovich, H. M. 2009a. The biological reconstruction of Tetradium Dana, 1846. Lethaia, 42:297–311.Google Scholar
Steele-Petrovich, H. M. 2009b. Biological affinity, phenotypic variation and palaeoecology of Tetradium Dana, 1846. Lethaia, 42:383–392.Google Scholar
Webby, B. D. and Semeniuk, V. 1971. The Ordovician coral genus Tetradium Dana from New South Wales. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 95:246–259.Google Scholar
Wettstein, A. 1901. Handbuch der Systematischen Botanik. Vol. 1. Franz Deuticke, Leipzig & Vienna, 201 p.Google Scholar