Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:37:27.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantitative analysis of ontogenetic changes of cell-reflecting sculptures in Ostracoda (Crustacea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Toshiaki Irizuki*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Aichi University of Education, Kariya 448, Japan

Abstract

The distributional patterns of reticulate sculptures, corresponding to those of the underlying epidermal cells, of two Baffinicythere species (Ostracoda, Crustacea) are discussed from a geometrical point of view to understand whether they are under some rule or not. Reticulation geometry has been quantified by applying the method of Dirichlet domains defined as convex polygons, each being demarcated by bisectors normal to the lines connecting neighboring pairs of points. Studies of the distributional patterns of reticulation during growth reveal that these polygons become closer to Dirichlet domains and are dominated by hexagonal or subcircular fossa outlines toward the adult stage, and ultimately reach an equilibrium and stable pattern at maturity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Furaih, A. F. 1977. Cretaceous and Palaeocene species of the ostracod Hornibrookella from Saudi Arabia. Palaeontology, 20:483502.Google Scholar
Benson, R. H. 1972. The Bradleya problem, with descriptions of two new psychrospheric ostracode genera, Agrenocythere and Poseidonamicus (Ostracoda: Crustacea). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 12:1138.Google Scholar
Benson, R. H. 1977. Evolution of Oblitacythereis from Paleocosta (Ostracoda: Trachyleberididae) during the Cenozoic in the Mediterranean and Atlantic. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 33:147.Google Scholar
Benson, R. H. 1983. Biomechanical stability and sudden change in the evolution of the deep-sea ostracode Poseidonamicus . Paleobiology, 9:398413.Google Scholar
Brady, G. S. 1866. On new or imperfectly known species of marine Ostracoda. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London, 5:359393.Google Scholar
Cronin, T. M., and Ikeya, N. 1987. The Omma–Manganji ostracod fauna (Plio-Pleistocene) of Japan and the zoogeography of circumpolar species. Journal of Micropalaeontology, 6:6588.Google Scholar
Fujioka, K., Tsukawaki, S., Yoshida, H., Yamanaka, M., Kosaka, K., and Marino, Y. 1988. Geology of Otsuchi Bay and its adjacent area—Otsuchi Bay as a natural laboratory. Otsuchi Marine Research Center Report, 14:1546 [in Japanese].Google Scholar
Hasegawa, M., and Tanemura, M. 1976. On the pattern of space division by territories. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 28B:509519.Google Scholar
Hazel, J. E. 1967. Classification and distribution of the Recent Hemicytheridae and Trachyleberididae (Ostracoda) off northeastern North America. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 564, 49 p.Google Scholar
Honda, H. 1978. Description of cellular patterns by Dirichlet domains: the two-dimensional case. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 72:523543.Google Scholar
Honda, H., and Eguchi, G. 1980. How much does the cell boundary contact in a monolayered cell sheet? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 84:575588.Google Scholar
Irizuki, T., and Sasaki, O. 1993. Analysis of morphological changes through ontogeny: genera Baffinicythere and Elofsonella , p. 335350. In McKenzie, K. G. and Jones, P. J. (eds.), Ostracoda in the Earth and Life Sciences. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1806. Genera crustaceorum et insectorum. 1:1303.Google Scholar
Liebau, A. 1969. Homologisierende Korrelationen von Trachyleberididen-Ornamenten (Ostracoda, Cytheracea). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Monatshefte, 7:390402.Google Scholar
Liebau, A. 1975. Comment on suprageneric taxa of the Trachyleberididae s.n. (Ostracoda, Cytheracea). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen, 148:353379.Google Scholar
Liebau, A. 1977a. Homologous sculpture patterns in Trachyleberididae and related ostracods. [Liebau, A. 1971. Homologe Skulpturmuster bei trachyleberididen und verwandten Ostrakoden. Dissertation an der Technischen Universität Berlin, 1–118]. Translated and published for the Smithsonian Institution and National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C., 93 p.Google Scholar
Liebau, A. 1977b. Carapace ornamentation of the Ostracoda Cytheracea: principles of evolution and functional significance, p. 107120. In Löffler, H. and Danielopol, D. (eds.), Aspects of Ecology and Zoogeography of Recent and Fossil Ostracoda. Dr. W. Junk b. v. Publishers, The Hague.Google Scholar
Liebau, A. 1991. Skulptur-Evolution bei Ostrakoden am Beispiel europaischer “Quadracytheren.” Geologie und Paläontologie in Westfalen, 13:1395.Google Scholar
Mueller, G. W. 1894. Die Ostracoden des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. Naples Stazione Zoologica Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel, Monographie 21, 404 p.Google Scholar
Okada, Y. 1981. Development of cell arrangement in ostracode carapaces. Paleobiology, 7:276280.Google Scholar
Okada, Y. 1982a. Structure and cuticle formation of the reticulated carapace of the ostracode Bicornucythere bisanensis . Lethaia, 15:85101.Google Scholar
Okada, Y. 1982b. Ultrastructure and pattern of the carapace of Bicornucythere bisanensis (Ostracoda, Crustacea). University Museum, University of Tokyo, Bulletin 20:229255.Google Scholar
Puri, H. S. 1953. The ostracode genus Hemicythere and its allies. Journal of the Washington Academy of Science, 43:169179.Google Scholar
Tanemura, M., and Hasegawa, M. 1980. Geometrical models of territory I. Models for synchronous and asynchronous settlement of territories. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 82:477496.Google Scholar
Valicenti, V. H. 1977. Some Hemicytherinae from the Tertiary of Patagonia (Argentina) and their morphological relationship and stratigraphical distribution, p. 93106. In Löffler, H. and Danielopol, D. (eds.), Aspects of Ecology and Zoogeography of Recent and Fossil Ostracoda. Dr. W. Junk b.v. Publishers, The Hague.Google Scholar