Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:22:51.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Problematic phosphatic plates from the Silurian–Early Devonian of Bohemia, Czech Republic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Annalisa Ferretti ,
Enrico Serpagli  and
Petr Štorch
Annalisa Ferretti
Affiliation:
Dipartimento del Museo di Paleobiologia e dell'Orto Botanico, Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, 41100 Modena, Italia, ,
Enrico Serpagli
Affiliation:
Dipartimento del Museo di Paleobiologia e dell'Orto Botanico, Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, 41100 Modena, Italia, ,
Petr Štorch
Affiliation:
Institute of Geology AS CR, Rozvojovà 135, Praha 6 Suchdol 16502, Czech Republic,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Problematic phosphatic elements are reported for the first time from Bohemia, Czech Republic, and are attributed to Eurytholia bohemica n. sp. Similar mineralized elements, interpreted as sclerites, were known only in a very narrow interval from Middle-Late Ordovician beds bordering the Iapetus Ocean. This new report comes from the Silurian and Early Devonian and provides a significant range extension for these Problematica as well as an enlargement of their geographic extent. Comments open new perspectives in the interpretation of these elements.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 80 , Issue 5 , September 2006 , pp. 1026 - 1031
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chlupáč, I., Jaeger, H., and Zikmundová, J. 1972. The Silurian–Devonian Boundary in Barrandian. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 20:104–174.Google Scholar
Chlupáč, I., Havlíček, V., Kříž, J., Kukal, Z., and Štorch, P. 1998. Palaeozoic of the Barrandian (Cambrian–Devonian). Czech Geological Survey, Prague, 183 p.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S., and Bengtson, S. 1994. Cambrian predators: Possible evidence from boreholes. Journal of Paleontology, 68:1–23.Google Scholar
Corradini, C., and Serpagli, E. 1999. A Silurian conodont biozonation from late Llandovery to end Přídolí in Sardinia (Italy), p. 255–273. In Serpagli, E. (ed.), Studies on Conodonts: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Conodonts. Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 37 (1998).Google Scholar
Dzik, J., and Drygant, D. 1986. The apparatus of panderodontid conodonts. Lethaia, 19:133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havlíček, V. 1981. Development of a linear sedimentary depression exemplified by the Prague Basin (Ordovician–Middle Devonian, Barrandian area-central Bohemia). Sborník Geologických Věd, Geologie, 35:7–48.Google Scholar
Havlíček, V., and Štorch, P. 1990. Silurian brachiopods and benthic communities in the Prague Basin (Czechoslovakia). Rozpravy Ústředního Ústavu Geologického, 48:1–275.Google Scholar
Holmer, L. E. 1989. Middle Ordovician phosphatic inarticulate brachiopods from Västergötland and Dalarna, Sweden. Fossils and Strata, 26:1–172.Google Scholar
Kříž, J. 1998. Recurrent Silurian–lowest Devonian cephalopod limestones of Gondwanan Europe and Perunica, p. 183–198. In Landing, E. and Johnson, M. E. (eds.), Silurian Cycles: Linkages of Dynamic Stratigraphy with Atmospheric, Oceanic and Tectonic Changes. New York State Museum Bulletin, 491.Google Scholar
Müller, K. J., and Nogami, Y. 1972. Entöken und Bohrspuren bei den Conodontophorida. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 46:68–86.Google Scholar
Nicoll, R. S. 1985. Multielement composition of the conodont species Polygnathus xylus xylus Stauffer, 1940 and Ozarkodina brevis (Bischoff & Ziegler, 1957) from the Upper Devonian of the Canning Basin, Western Australia. BMR Journal of Australian Geology & Geophysics, 9:133–147.Google Scholar
Nicoll, R. S., and Rexroad, C. B. 1987. Re-examination of Silurian conodont clusters from northern Indiana, p. 49–61. In Aldridge, R. J. (ed.), Palaeobiology of Conodonts. British Micropalaeontological Society Series. Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester.Google Scholar
Nowlan, G. S. 1979. Fused clusters of the conodont genus Belodina Ethington from the Thumb Mountain Formation (Ordovician), Ellesmere Island, District of Franklin. Current Research, Pt. A. Geological Survey of Canada Paper, 79–1A:213–218.Google Scholar
Purnell, M. A., and Donoghue, P. C. I. 1998. Skeletal architecture, homologies and taphonomy of ozarkodinid conodonts. Palaeontology, 41:57–102.Google Scholar
Štorch, P. 1995. Upper Silurian (upper Ludlow) graptolites of the N. inexpectatus and N. kozlowskii biozones from Kosov Quarry near Beroun (Barrandian area, Bohemia). Bulletin of the Czech Geological Survey, 70:65–89.Google Scholar
Sutton, M. D., Holmer, L. E., and Cherns, L. 2001. Small problematic phosphatic sclerites from the Ordovician of Iapetus. Journal of Paleontology, 75:1–8.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar