Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-j4qg9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T01:56:08.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Primitive cladid crinoids from upper Osagean-lower Meramecian (Mississippian) rocks of east-central United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Thomas W. Kammer  and
William I. Ausich
Thomas W. Kammer
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, P.O. Box 6300, Morgantown 26506-6300
William I. Ausich
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Species of the late Osagean and early Meramecian primitive cladid crinoid genera Atelestocrinus, Barycrinus, Cestocrinus, Costalocrinus, Cyathocrinites, Meniscocrinus n. gen., Parisocrinus, Pellecrinus, and Saccosomopsis from Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Missouri, and Tennessee are reviewed, redescribed, and redefined from study of type material, museum collections, and field collections. Nomenclatural and systematic acts include the following: 1) Barycrinus spurius (Hall, 1858) is a senior synonym of Cyathocrinus tumidus Hall, 1858, C. protuberans Hall, 1858, and B. mammatus Meek and Worthen, 1873; 2) B. rhombiferus (Owen and Shumard, 1852a) is a senior synonym of C. sculptilis Hall, 1860, C. thomae Hall, 1860, C. hoveyi Hall, 1861a, C. wachsmuthi Meek and Worthen, 1861, B. herculeus Meek and Worthen, 1868, B. pentagonus Meek and Worthen, 1873, B. striatus Worthen, 1875, B. boonvillensis Miller, 1891b, B. formosus Miller and Gurley, 1894, B. washingtonensis Miller and Gurley, 1895, and B. elrodi Miller and Gurley, 1896a; 3) B. magister (Hall, 1858) is a senior synonym of C. solidus Hall, 1861a and B. magnificus Meek and Worthen, 1868; 4) B. stellatus (Hall, 1858) is a senior synonym of C. bullatus Hall, 1858, C. angulatus Meek and Worthen, 1860, C. quinquelobus Meek and Worthen, 1865, and B. astericus Van Sant, 1964; 5) B. crassibrachiatus (Hall, 1860) is a senior synonym of B. princeps Miller and Gurley, 1890a; 6) B. geometricus Meek and Worthen, 1873, is considered a nomen dubium; 7) B. benedicti (Miller, 1891a) is considered a nomen dubium; 8) Cyathocrinus signatus Miller and Gurley, 1894, is assigned to Cestocrinus and is a senior synonym of Cestocrinus striatus Kirk, 1940; 9) Cyathocrinites iowensis (Owen and Shumard, 1850) is a senior synonym of C. malvaceus Hall, 1858, C. divaricatus Hall, 1858, C. rotundatus Hall, 1858, C. viminalis Hall, 1861a, C. parvibrachiatus Hall, 1861a, C. hamiltonensis Worthen, 1882, C. nodosus Wachsmuth and Springer, 1890, C. brevisacculus Wachsmuth and Springer, 1890, C. opimus Miller and Gurley, 1890a, and C. gurleyi Miller, 1891a; 10) C. kelloggi (White, 1862) is a senior synonym of C. subtumidus Meek and Worthen, 1865; 11) C. farleyi (Meek and Worthen, 1866b) is a senior synonym of C. andersoni Miller and Gurley, 1894, C. granulosus Rowley, 1902, and C. snivelyi Rowley, 1902; 12) C. harrodi (Wachsmuth and Springer, 1880) is a senior synonym of C. boonvillensis Miller, 1891b, C. gorbyi Miller, 1892b, and C. astralus Kammer, 1984; 13) Meniscocrinus n. gen. is described and M. magnitubus n. sp. is assigned to this new genus; 14) C. labyrinthicus Miller, 1891a, is assigned to Parisocrinus; 15) C. intermedius Hall, 1858, is assigned to Pellecrinus; and 16) C. insperatus Lyon, 1869, is assigned to Saccosomopsis and is a senior synonym of C.? poterium Meek and Worthen, 1870.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 70 , Issue 5 , September 1996 , pp. 835 - 866
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ausich, W.I. 1980. A model for niche differentiation in Lower Mississippian crinoid communities. Journal of Paleontology, 54:273–288.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I. 1983a. Functional morphology and feeding dynamics of the Early Mississippian crinoid Barycrinus asteriscus. Journal of Paleontology, 57:31–41.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I. 1983b. Component concept for the study of paleocommunities with an example from the Early Carboniferous of southern Indiana. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 44:251–282.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I. and Kammer, T.W. 1990. Systematics and phylogeny of the late Osagean and Meramecian crinoids Platycrinites and Eucladocrinus from the Mississippian stratotype region. Journal of Paleontology, 64:759–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W.I. and Kammer, T.W. 1991a. Late Osagean and Meramecian Actinocrinites (Echinodermata: Crinoidea) from the Mississippian stratotype region. Journal of Paleontology, 65:485–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W.I. and Kammer, T.W. 1991b. Systematic revisions to Aorocrinus, Dorycrinus, Macrocrinus, Paradichocrinus, Strotocrinus, and Uperocrinus: Mississippian camerate crinoids (Echinodermata) from the stratotype region. Journal of Paleontology, 65:936–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W.I. and Kammer, T.W. 1992. Dizygocrinus: Mississippian camerate crinoid (Echinodermata) from the midcontinental United States. Journal of Paleontology, 66:637–658.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I. and Kammer, T.W., and Baumiller, T.K. 1994. Demise of the Middle Paleozoic crinoid fauna: a single extinction event or rapid faunal turnover? Paleobiology, 20:345–361.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I. and Lane, N. G. 1980. Platform communities and rocks of the Borden siltstone delta (Mississippian) along the south shore of Monroe Reservoir, Monroe County, Indiana, p. 36–67. In Shaver, R. H. (ed.), Field Trips 1980 from the Indiana University Campus, Bloomington. Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I. and Lane, N. G. 1982. Crinoids from the Edwardsville Formation (Lower Mississippian) of southern Indiana. Journal of Paleontology, 56:1343–1361.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I. and Lane, N. G. 1985. Crinoid assemblages and geographic endemism in the Lower Mississippian (Carboniferous) of the United States Continental Interior, p. 216–224. In Dutro, J. T. Jr., and Pfefferkorn, H. W. (eds.), Neuvième Congrès International de Stratigraphie et de Géologie du Carbonifère, Compte Rendu, Vol. 5, Paleontology/ Paleoecology/ Paleogeography.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S., and Moodey, M. W. 1943. Bibliographic and faunal index of Paleozoic pelmatozoan echinoderms. Geological Society of America Special Paper 45, 734 p.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A. 1900. The Echinodermata. The Pelmatozoa: The Crinoidea, p. 94–204. In Lankester, E.R. (ed.), A Treatise on Zoology. Adam and Charles Black, London.Google Scholar
Breimer, A. 1978. General Morphology, recent crinoids, p. T9–T58. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part T, Echinodermata 2(2). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Donovan, S.K. 1988. The early evolution of the Crinoidea, p. 235–244. In Paul, C.R.C. and Smith, A.B. (eds.), Echinoderm Phylogeny and Evolutionary Biology. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 373 p.Google Scholar
Feldman, H.R. 1989. Echinoderms of the Somerset Shale Member, Salem Limestone (Mississippian), in Indiana and Kentucky. Journal of Paleontology, 63:900–912.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1858. Report on the Geological Survey of Iowa embracing the results of investigations made during portions of the years 1855, 1856, 1857. Geological Survey of Iowa, Vol. 1, Parts 1 and 2, 724 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1860. Contributions to the palaeontology of Iowa: being descriptions of new species of Crinoidea and other fossils. Iowa Geological Survey, 1(2) supplement, 94 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1861a. Descriptions of new species of Crinoidea and other fossils, from the Carboniferous rocks of the Mississippi Valley. Iowa Geological Survey Report of Investigations, Preliminary Notice. Albany, New York, 19 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1861b. Descriptions of new species of Crinoidea from the Carboniferous rocks of the Mississippi valley. Boston Society of Natural History Journal, 7:261–328.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1872. Photographic plates and explanations of plates. Albany, New York, [plates are labeled as “New York State Museum of Natural History Bulletin 1” but A. S. Horowitz suggested that these were probably published privately by Hall.]Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1918. Phylogenie und System der Pelmatozoen. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 3(1):1–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kammer, T. W. 1984. Crinoids from the New Providence Shale Member of the Borden Formation (Mississippian) in Kentucky and Indiana. Journal of Paleontology, 58:115–130.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W. 1985. Aerosol filtration theory applied to Mississippian deltaic crinoids. Journal of Paleontology, 59:551–560.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W. and Ausich, W. I. 1987. Aerosol suspension feeding and current velocities: distributional controls for late Osagean crinoids. Paleobiology, 13:379–395.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W. and Ausich, W. I. 1992. Advanced cladid crinoids from the Middle Mississippian of the east-central United States: Primitive-grade calyces. Journal of Paleontology, 66:461–480.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W. and Ausich, W. I. 1993a. Advanced cladid crinoids from the Middle Mississippian of the east-central United States: Intermediate-grade calyces. Journal of Paleontology, 67:614–639.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W. and Ausich, W. I. 1993b. Did facies specialists evolve more rapidly than facies generalists in Early Carboniferous crinoids? Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 25(6):A104.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W. and Ausich, W. I. 1994. Advanced cladid crinoids from the Middle Mississippian of the east-central United States: Advanced-grade calyces. Journal of Paleontology, 68:339–351.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W. and Ausich, W. I., and Lane, N.G. 1983. Paleontology and stratigraphy of the Borden delta of southern Indiana and northern Kentucky, p. 37–71. In Shaver, R.H. and Sunderman, J.A. (eds.), Field Trips in Midwestern Geology. Geological Society of America and Indiana Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W., Brenckle, P. L., Carter, J. L., and Ausich, W. I. 1990. Redefinition of the Osagean-Meramecian boundary in the Mississippian stratotype region. Palaios, 5:414–431.Google Scholar
Kelly, S.M. 1986. Classification and evolution of Class Crinoidea. Abstracts of the 4th North American Paleontological Convention, p. A23.Google Scholar
Keyes, C.R. 1894. Paleontology of Missouri, Part 1. Missouri Geological Survey, 4:143–225.Google Scholar
Kirk, E. 1929. The fossil crinoid genus Vasocrinus Lyon. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 74 (art. 15):1-16.Google Scholar
Kirk, E. 1940. Cestocrinus, a new fossil inadunate crinoid genus. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 88:221–224.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G. 1972. Synecology of Middle Mississippian (Carboniferous) crinoid communities in Indiana. 24th International Geological Congress, Abstracts, Section 7, Paleontology, p. 89–94.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G. 1973. Paleontology and paleoecology of the Crawfordsville fossil site (Upper Osagian: Indiana). University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 99:1–147.Google Scholar
Levin, H.L. 1991. The Earth Through Time. Fourth Edition. Saunders College Publishing, 651 p.Google Scholar
Lyon, S. S. 1869. Remarks on thirteen new species of Crinoidea from the Paleozoic rocks of Indiana, Kentucky, and Ohio, and a description of certain peculiarities in the structure of the columns of Dolatocrinus, and their attachment to the body of the animal. American Philosophical Society, Transactions 13:443–466.Google Scholar
Lyon, S. S. and Casseday, S.A. 1859. Description of nine new species of Crinoidea from the Subcarboniferous rocks of Indiana and Kentucky. America. Journal of Science, Series 2, 28:233–246.Google Scholar
Lyon, S. S. and Casseday, S.A. 1860. A synonymic list of the Echinodermata of the Palaeozoic rocks of North America. Proceedings of the American Academy of Science and Arts, 4:282–304.Google Scholar
Macurda, D.B. and Meyer, D.L. 1974. Feeding posture of modern stalked crinoids. Nature, 247:394–396.Google Scholar
McIntosh, G.C. 1984. Devonian cladid inadunate crinoids: Family Botryocrinidae Bather, 1899. Journal of Paleontology, 58:1260–1281.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1860. Description of new species of Crinoidea and Echinoidea from the Carboniferous rocks of Illinois, and other western states. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Proceedings, Series 2, 4:379–397.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1861. Descriptions of new Paleozoic fossils from Illinois and Iowa. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Proceedings for 1861, p. 128–148.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1865. Description of new species of Crinoidea, etc., from the Palaeozoic rocks of Illinois and some of the adjoining states. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Proceedings, 17(3):143–155.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1866a. Descriptions of invertebrates from the Carboniferous system. Illinois Geological Survey, 2:143–411.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1866b. Contributions to the palaeontology of Illinois and other western states. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Proceedings for 1866, p. 251–275.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1868. Remarks on some types of Carboniferous Crinoidea with descriptions of new genera and species of the same, and of one echinoid. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Proceedings, 20:335–359.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1869. Descriptions of new Carboniferous fossils from the western states. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Proceedings, 22:137–172.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1870. Description of new species and genera of fossils from the Paleozoic rocks of the western states. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia for 1870, p. 22–56.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1873. Descriptions of invertebrates from Carboniferous system. Illinois Geological Survey, 5:321–619.Google Scholar
Miller, J. S. 1821. A Natural History of the Crinoidea or Lily-Shaped Animals, with Observation on the genera Asteria, Euryale, Comatula, and Marsupites. Bryan and Company; Bristol, England, 150 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1882. Description of ten new species of fossils. Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, 5:79–88.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1889. North American Geology and Paleontology. Western Methodist Book Concern; Cincinnati, Ohio, 664 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1891a. Paleontology. Advance Sheets from the Indiana Department of Geology and Natural Resources Annual report 17, 103 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1891b. A description of some Lower Carboniferous crinoids from Missouri. Missouri Geological Survey Bulletin 4, 40 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1892a. Palaeontology. Indiana Department of Geology and Natural Resources Annual report 17:611–705.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1892b. Palaeontology. Advance Sheets from the Eighteenth Report of the Geological Survey of Indiana, 76 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1892c. First appendix to North American Geology and Palaeontology. Privately published by author, Cincinnati, Ohio, p. 665–718.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1894. Palaeontology. Indiana Department of Geology and Natural Resources Annual report 18:257–333.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1897. Second appendix to North American Geology and Palaeontology. Privately published by author, Cincinnati, Ohio, p. 719–793.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. and Gurley, W. F. E. 1890a. Description of some new genera and species of Echinodermata from the Coal Measures and Subcarboniferous rocks of Indiana, Missouri, and Iowa. Private publication, 59 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. and Gurley, W. F. E. 1890b. Description of some new genera and species of Echinodermata from the Coal Measures and Subcarboniferous rocks of Indiana, Missouri, and Iowa. Indiana Department of Geology and Natural History Annual Report, 16:327–373.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. and Gurley, W. F. E. 1894. New genera and species of Echinodermata. Illinois State Museum of Natural History Bulletin 5, 53 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. and Gurley, W. F. E. 1895. Description of new species of Paleozoic Echinodermata. Illinois State Museum of Natural History Bulletin 6, 62 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. and Gurley, W. F. E. 1896a. Description of new and remarkable fossils from the Paleozoic rocks of the Mississippi Valley. Illinois State Museum of Natural History Bulletin 8, 65 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. and Gurley, W. F. E. 1896b. New species of crinoids from Illinois and other states. Illinois State Museum of Natural History Bulletin 9, 66 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R.C. 1962. Ray structures of some inadunate crinoids. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Echinodermata, Article 5, p. 1–47.Google Scholar
Moore, R.C. and Laudon, L. R. 1943. Evolution and classification of Paleozoic crinoids. Geological Society of America Special Paper 46, 167 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R.C. and Laudon, L. R. 1944. Class Crinoidea, p. 137–209. In Shimer, H. W., and Shrock, R. R. (eds.), Index Fossils of North America. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Moore, R.C., Lane, N.G., and Strimple, H.L. 1978. Order Cladida, p. T578–T755. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part T, Echinodermata 2(2). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Owen, D.D., and Shumard, B.F. 1850. Descriptions of fifteen new species of Crinoidea from the Subcarboniferous limestone of Iowa. Journal of the Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences, Series 2, volume 2, Part 1, p. 57–70.Google Scholar
Owen, D.D., and Shumard, B.F. 1852a. Descriptions of seven new species of Crinoidea from the Subcarboniferous limestone of Iowa and Illinois. Journal of the Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences, Series 2, volume 2, Part 2, p. 89–94.Google Scholar
Owen, D.D., and Shumard, B.F. 1852b. Descriptions of one new genus and twenty-two new species of Crinoidea from the Subcarboniferous limestone of Iowa, p. 587–598. In Owen, D.D., Report of a Geological Survey of Wisconsin, Iowa, and Minnesota. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Rowley, R.R. 1902. New species of fossils from the Subcarboniferous rocks of northeastern Missouri. American Geologist, 29:303–310.Google Scholar
Schultze, L. 1867. Monographie der Echinodermen des Eifler Kalkes. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Wien, mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Denkschriften; Sitzungsberichte, 26:113–230.Google Scholar
Simms, M.J., and Sevastopulo, G.D. 1993. The origin of articulate crinoids. Palaeontology, 36:91–109.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1900. On the presence of pores in the ventral sac in fistulate crinoids. American Geologist, 26:133–151.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1911a. Some new American fossil crinoids. Harvard College, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Memoir 25:117–161.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1911b. The crinoid fauna of the Knobstone formation. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 41:175–208.Google Scholar
Sprinkle, J. 1987. Additional Concepts, Phylum Echinodermata, p. 572–596. In Boardman, R.S., Cheetham, A.H., Rowell, A.J., (eds.), Fossil Invertebrates. Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Stearn, C.W. and Carroll, R.L. 1989. Paleontology: The Record of Life. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 453 p.Google Scholar
Stanley, S.M. 1979. Macroevolution, Pattern and Process. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 332 p.Google Scholar
Troost, G. 1849. Geographical survey of Tennessee. American Journal of Science and Arts, (2)8:419–420.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1953. Classe des Crinoïdes, p. 658–773. In Piveteau, J. (ed.), Traité de paléontologie, Vol. 3. Masson and Cie, Paris.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1978. Skeletal morphology of fossil crinoids, p. T58–T216. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C., eds., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. T, Echinodermata 2(1). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Van Sant, J. F. 1964. Crawfordsville crinoids, p. 34–136. In Van Sant, J. F., and Lane, N. G., Crawfordsville crinoid studies. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions Article, 7.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F. 1880. Revision of the Palaeocrinoidae. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia for 1879, p. 226–378.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F. 1885. Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea, Pt. 3, Sec. 1, Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia for 1885, p. 223–364 (1-139).Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F. 1886. Revision of the Palaeocrinoidae, Pt. 3, Sec. 2, Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia for 1885, p. 64–226 (140-302).Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F. 1890. New species of crinoids and blastoids from the Kinderhook group of the Lower Carboniferous rocks at Le Grand, Iowa; and a new genus from the Niagara group of western Tennessee. Illinois Geological Survey, 8(2), Palaeontology of Illinois, section 2, p. 155–208.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F. 1897. The North American Crinoidea Camerata. Harvard College Museum of Comparative Zoology, Memoir 21-22, 897 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1973. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids 1942-1968. Geological Society of America Memoir, 137, 341 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1977. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids 1969-1973. Geological Society of America Microform Publication 137, 235 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1986. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids 1974-1980. Geological Society of America Microform Publication, 16, 405 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1988. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids 1981-1985. Geological Society of America Microform Publication 8, 236 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1993. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids 1986-1990. Geological Society of America Microform Publication 16, 204 p.Google Scholar
Weller, S. 1898. A bibliographic index of Carboniferous invertebrates. U. S. Geological Survey Bulletin 153, 653p.Google Scholar
Weller, S. 1900. The paleontology of the Niagaran Limestone in the Chicago area; the Crinoidea. Chicago Academy of Sciences, Natural History Survey, Bulletin 4 (1):1-152.Google Scholar
White, C.A. 1862. Description of new species of fossils from the Devonian and Carboniferous rocks of the Mississippi Valley. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History, 9:8–33.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R.P. 1893. Republication of descriptions of Lower Carboniferous Crinoidea from the Hall Collection now in the American Museum of Natural History, with illustrations of the original type specimens not heretofore figured. Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History, 1:1–37.Google Scholar
Wilson, C.W. Jr. 1948. The geology of Nashville, Tennessee. Tennessee Division of Geology Bulletin 53, 172 p.Google Scholar
Wolf, R.C. 1979. Hunting Iowa's crinoids. Earth Science, 32(4):149–151.Google Scholar
Wood, E. 1909. A critical summary of Troost's unpublished manuscript on the crinoids of Tennessee. United States National Museum Bulletin 64, 115 p.Google Scholar
Worthen, A.H. 1875. Descriptions of invertebrates. Illinois Geological Survey, 6:489–532.Google Scholar
Worthen, A.H. 1882. Descriptions of fifty-four new species of crinoids from the Lower Carboniferous limestones and Coal Measures of Illinois and Iowa. Illinois State Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 1 (Article 1):3-38.Google Scholar
Worthen, A.H. 1883. Description of fossil invertebrates. Illinois Geological Survey, 7:269–322.Google Scholar
Worthen, A.H. 1890. Description of fossil invertebrates. Illinois Geological Survey, 8:69–154.Google Scholar