Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:08:15.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phylogeny of the Eocene Antarctic Tapetinae Gray, 1851 (Bivalvia, Veneridae) from the La Meseta and Submeseta formations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2020

Maximiliano Jorge Alvarez
Affiliation:
Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia, Angel Gallardo 470, 1405, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Claudia Julia del Río
Affiliation:
Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia, Angel Gallardo 470, 1405, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Abstract

Systematic analysis shows that the Southern Hemisphere bivalve genus Retrotapes includes the Antarctic species R. antarcticus, R. newtoni, and R. robustus and recognizes for the first time the presence of Katelysia represented by K. florentinoi. Two new genera were erected in this study: Marciachlys new genus to include M. inflata new combination, and Adelfia new genus, which includes A. austrolissa new combination and A. omega new species from the Eocene of Antarctica, and the late Eocene Chilean A. arenosa new combination. Eurhomalea carlosi was synonymized with K. florentinoi; Cyclorismina marwicki with R. antarcticus; Gomphina iheringi was considered an indeterminate species; and Cockburnia lunulifera was excluded from the Tapetinae. These systematic assignments are supported by a phylogenetic analysis, which recognizes an Austral clade of Tapetinae, comprising all the genera mentioned above, along with Marcia, Paleomarcia, Atamarcia, and Protapes.

UUID: http://zoobank.org/a8c91a9f-99ec-4235-8416-d398771a3eb2

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2020, The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, A., and Reeve, L., 1848–1850, Mollusca, in Adams, A., ed., The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Samarang, under the command of the Captain Sir Edward Belcher, C.B., F.R.A.S., F.G.S., during the years 1843–1846: London, Reeve and Benham, 87 p.Google Scholar
Adams, H., and Adams, A., 1853–1858, The genera of Recent Mollusca, arranged according to their organization: London, J. van Voorst, (vol. 1, p. 1–256, 1853; p. 257–484, 1854; vol. 2, p. 1–92, 1854; p. 93–284, 1855; p. 285–412, 1856; p. 413–540, 1857; p. 541–661, 1858).Google Scholar
Alvarez, M.J., 2019, Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Retrotapes del Río, 1997 (Bivalvia: Veneridae) and systematic analysis of its taxa from Chile: Journal of Paleontology, v. 93, p. 685701. doi: 10.1017/jpa.2018.110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, M.J., and Pérez, D.E., 2016, Gerontic intraspecific variation in the Antarctic bivalve Retrotapes antarcticus: Ameghiniana, v. 53, p. 485494.Google Scholar
Alvarez, M.J., del Río, C.J., and Marenssi, S.A., 2014, Revisión del género Retrotapes del Río (Bivalvia: Veneridae) en el Eoceno de la Antártida: Ameghiniana, v. 51, p. 6178.Google Scholar
Amenábar, C.R., Montes, M., Nozal, F., and Santillana, S., 2019, Dinoflagellate cysts of the La Meseta Formation (middle to late Eocene), Antarctic Peninsula: implications for biostratigraphy, palaeoceanography and palaeoenvironment: Geological Magazine, v. 157 p. 351366. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756819000591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beu, A.G., 2009, Before the ice: biogeography of Antarctic Paleogene molluscan faunas: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 284, p. 191226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, I., 1778, Index rerum naturalium Musei Caesarei Vindobonensis, pars prima. Testacea: Wien, Officina Krausiana, 458 p.Google Scholar
Cenizo, M., Acosta Hospitaleche, C., and Reguero, M., 2015, Diversity of pseudo-toothed birds (Pelagornithidae) from the Eocene of Antarctica: Journal of Paleontology, v. 89, p. 870881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cossmann, M., 1920, Rectifications de nomenclature: Revue Critique de Paléozoologie, v. 24, p. 8183.Google Scholar
Crame, J.A., Beu, A.G., Ineson, J.R., Francis, J.E., Whittle, R.J., and Bowman, V.C., 2014, The early origin of the Antarctic marine fauna and its evolutionary implications: PloS one, v. 9, e114743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dall, W.H., 1902, Synopsis of the family Veneridae and of the North American Recent species: Proceedings of the United States National Museum, v. 26, p. 355412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
del Río, C.J., 1997, Cenozoic biogeographic history of the eurythermal genus Retrotapes, new genus (Subfamily Tapetinae) from southern South America and Antarctica: The Nautilus, v. 110, p. 7793.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G.P., 1854, Descriptions of new shells from the collection of Hugh Cuming, Esq: Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, v. 22, p. 317371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillwyn, L.W., 1817, A descriptive catalogue of Recent shells, arranged according to the Linnean method; with particular attention to the synonymy: London, John and Arthur Arch, v. 2, p. 5811092.Google Scholar
Douglas, P.M., Affek, H.P., Ivany, L.C., Houben, A.J., Sijp, W.P., Sluijs, A., Schouten, S., and Pagani, M., 2014, Pronounced zonal heterogeneity in Eocene southern high-latitude sea surface temperatures: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 111, p. 65826587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elliot, D.H., and Trautman, T.A., 1982, Lower Tertiary strata on Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula, in Craddock, C., ed., Antarctic Geoscience: Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, p. 287297.Google Scholar
Farris, J.S., Albert, V.A., Källersjö, M., Lipscomb, D., and Kluge, A.G., 1996, Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining: Cladistics, v. 12, p. 99124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felsenstein, J., 1985, Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap: Evolution, v. 39, p. 783791.Google ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, H.O., 1938, Marine Tertiary fossils and a description of a Recent Mytilus from Kerguelen Islands: British, Australian and New Zealand Antarctic Research Expedition Reports, series A, p. 101–116.Google Scholar
Gmelin, J.F., 1791, Vermes, in Gmelin, J.F., ed., Caroli a Linnaei Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae: Editio Decima Tertia, Aucta Reformata. Tome 1, Pars 6: Leipzig, G.E. Beer, p. 30213910.Google Scholar
Goloboff, P.A., 1993, Estimating character weights during tree search: Cladistics, v. 9, p. 8391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goloboff, P.A., Farris, J.S., Källersjö, M., Oxelman, B., Ramírez, M.J., and Szumik, C.A., 2003, Improvements to resampling measures of group support: Cladistics, v. 19, p. 324332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goloboff, P.A., Farris, J.S., and Nixon, K.C., 2008, TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis: Cladistics, v. 24, p. 774786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J.E., 1851, List of the specimens of British animals in the collection of the British Museum. Part 7. Mollusca, Acephala and Brachiopoda: London, British Museum, 167 p.Google Scholar
Hutton, F.W., 1874, Description of three new Tertiary shells, in the Otago Museum: Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New Zealand, v. 7, p. 458.Google Scholar
Iredale, T., 1924, Results from Roy Bell's molluscan collections: Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, v. 49, p. 179278.Google Scholar
Ivany, L.C., Lohmann, K.C., Hasiuk, F., Blake, D.B., Glass, A., Aronson, R.B., and Moody, R.M., 2008, Eocene climate record of a high southern latitude continental shelf: Seymour Island, Antarctica: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 120, p. 659678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamarck, P.A., 1818, Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres, présentant les charactères généraux etc.: v. 5, Paris, Chez l'auteur, au Jardin du Roi, 612 p.Google Scholar
Lamy, E., 1935, Sur le Venus corrugata Lamarck (Moll. Lamellibr.): Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, v. 7, p. 357358.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1758, Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum clases, ordines, genera, species, cum… Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata: Holmiae, Impensis Direct, Laurentii Salvii, 824 p.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1767, Systema naturae per regna tria naturae… Editio duodecima, reformata. Tomus I: Holmiae, Impensis Direct, Laurentii Salvii, Pars II, p. 5331327.Google Scholar
Marenssi, S.A., 2006, Eustatically controlled sedimentation recorded by Eocene strata of the James Ross Basin, Antarctica, in Francis, J.E., Pirrie, D., and Crame, J.A., eds., Cretaceous–Tertiary high-latitude paleoenvironments, James Ross Basin, Antarctica: London, Geological Society of London, Special Publication, v. 258, p. 125133.Google Scholar
Marenssi, S.A., Santillana, S.N., and Rinaldi, C.A., 1998a, Stratigraphy of La Meseta Formation (Eocene), Marambio Island, Antarctica, in Casadío, S., ed., Paleógeno de América del Sur y de la Península Antártica: Buenos Aires, Revista de la Asociación Paleontológica Argentina, Publicación Especial, v. 5, p. 137146.Google Scholar
Marenssi, S.A., Santillana, S.N., and Rinaldi, C.A., 1998b, Paleoambientes sedimentarios de la Aloformación La Meseta (Eoceno), Isla Marambio (Seymour), Antártida: Instituto Antártico Argentino, Contribución, v. 464, p. 151.Google Scholar
Marenssi, S.A., Casadío, S., and Santillana, S.N., 2002, La Formación Man Aike al sur de El Calafate (Provincia de Santa Cruz) y su relación con la discordancia del Eoceno medio en la cuenca Austral: Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, v. 57, p. 341344.Google Scholar
Marwick, J., 1927, The Veneridae of New Zealand: Transactions of the New Zealand Institute, v. 57, p. 567635.Google Scholar
Marwick, J., 1931, The Tertiary Mollusca of the Gisborne District: Wellington, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Geological Survey Branch, p. 178.Google Scholar
Mongiardino Koch, N., Soto, I.M., and Ramírez, M.J., 2015, Overcoming problems with the use of ratios as continuous characters for phylogenetic analyses: Zoologica Scripta, v. 44, p. 463474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montes, M., Nozal, F., Santillana, S., Marenssi, S., and Olivero, E., 2013, Mapa Geológico de Isla Marambio (Seymour), Antártida, 1ª edición: Serie Cartográfica, escala 20.000, v. 1.Google Scholar
Montes, M., Beamud, E., Nozal, F., and Santillana, S., 2019a, Late Maastrichtian–Paleocene chronostratigraphy from Seymour Island, James Ross Basin, Antarctic Peninsula: Eustatic controls on sedimentation: Advances in Polar Science, v. 30, p. 303327. doi: 10.13679/j.advps.2018.0045Google Scholar
Montes, M., Nozal, F., Olivero, E., Gallastegui, G., Maestro, A., Santillana, S., and Martín-Serrano, A., 2019b, Serie Cartográfica Geocientífica Antártica, 1:20.000, in Montes, M., Nozal, F., and Santillana, S., eds., Geología y Geomorfología de la isla Marambio (Seymour). Madrid: Instituto Geológico y Minero de España; Buenos Aires, Instituto Antártico Argentino, p. 1250.Google Scholar
Mörch, O.A.L., 1853, Catalogus conchyliorum quae reliquit D. Alphonso d'Aguirra et Gadea, Comes de yoldi, regis Daniae cubiculariorum princeps ordinis Danebrogici in prima classe et ordinis tertii eques. Fasc. 2, Acephala, Annulata cirripedia, Echinodermata: Copenhague, Typis Ludovici Kleini, 74 p.Google Scholar
Nielsen, B.J., 1963, Studies of the genus Katelysia Römer 1857 (Mollusca, Lamellibranchiata): Memoirs of the Natural Museum of Victoria, v. 26, p. 219257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortmann, A.E., 1899, The fauna of the Magellanian beds of Punta Arenas, Chili: The American Journal of Science, v. 8, p. 427432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porębski, S.J., 1995, Facies architecture in a tectonically-controlled incised-valley estuary: La Meseta Formation (Eocene) of Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula: Studia Geologica Polonica, v. 107, p. 797.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C.S., 1815, Analyse de la nature, outableau de l'Universe et des corps organisées: Palerme, Aux dépens de l'auteur, 224 p.Google Scholar
Römer, E., 1857, Kritische Untersuchung der Arten Molluschengeschlechts Marcia bei Linne und Gmelin mit Berucksichtigung der später beschriebenen Arten: Cassel, Luckhardt, 135 p.Google Scholar
Sharman, G., and Newton, E.T., 1894, Notes on some fossils from Seymour Island, in the Antarctic regions obtained by Dr. Donald: Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburg, v. 37, p. 707709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowerby, G.B. II, 1853, Monograph of the genus Venus. Supplementary Veneridae. First index to Veneridae. Thesaurus conchyliorum, or monograph of genera of shells: London, Sowerby, v. 2, p. 703762.Google Scholar
Stilwell, J.D., 2000, Eocene Mollusca (Bivalvia, Gastropoda and Scaphopoda) from McMurdo Sound: systematics and paleoecologic significance, in Stilwell, J.D., and Feldmann, R.M., eds., Paleobiology and Paleoenvironments of Eocene Rocks, McMurdo Sound, East Antarctica: American Geophysical Union Antarctic Research Series, v. 76, p. 261–320.Google Scholar
Stilwell, J.D., and Zinsmeister, W.J., 1992, Molluscan systematics and biostratigraphy. Lower Tertiary La Meseta Formation, Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula: American Geophysical Union, Antarctic Research Series, v. 55, p. 1192.Google Scholar
Tate, R., 1887, Descriptions of some new species of South Australian marine and freshwater Mollusca: Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, v. 9, p. 6275.Google Scholar
Tate, R., 1900, Description of new genera and species of Australian Mollusca (chiefly Tasmanian): Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, v. 24, p. 104108.Google Scholar
Tenison-Woods, J.E., 1878, On some Tertiary fossils from Muddy Creek, Western Victoria: Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, v. 3, p. 222240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilckens, O., 1911, Die Mollusken der Antarktischen Tertiär formation: Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar Expedition, v. 3, p. 162.Google Scholar
Zinsmeister, W.J., 1984, Late Eocene bivalves (Mollusca) from the La Meseta Formation, collected during the 1974–1975 joint Argentine-American Expedition to Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula: Journal of Paleontology, v. 58, p. 14971527.Google Scholar