Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:54:12.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Permian Polyplacophora, Rostroconchia, and Problematica from Oregon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

R. A. Hanger ,
R. D. Hoare  and
E. E. Strong
R. A. Hanger
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C. 20052
R. D. Hoare
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio 43403
E. E. Strong
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C. 20052
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A silicified fauna from the early Permian Coyote Butte Limestone within the Grindstone terrane of central Oregon contains a diverse fauna including five polyplacophorans, one rostroconch, and one problematic taxa. New taxa include Gryphochiton planoplata new species, Arcochiton soccus new species, Homeochiton triangularis new genus and species, Arceodomus sphairikos new species, and Diadeloplax apiculatus new species.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 74 , Issue 2 , March 2000 , pp. 192 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belasky, P., Stevens, C. H., and Hanger, R. A. 1998. Permian paleogeography of western North America terranes and Northwestern Pangea. Geological Society of America Abstracts With Programs, 30(7):151.Google Scholar
Bergenhayn, J. R. M. 1955. Die fossilen schwedischen Loricaten nebst einer vorlaüfigen Revision des Systems der ganzen Klasse Loricata. Lunds University Årsskrift, new series, (2) 51 (8), 41 p.; Kongliga Fysiografiska Sallskapets Handlingar, new series, 66:1-41.Google Scholar
Blainville, H. M. D. de. 1816. Prodrome d'une nouvelle distribution systématique du règne animal. Société Philomathique, Paris, Niuveau Bolletin, p. 105–124.Google Scholar
Blome, C. D., and Nestell, M. K. 1991. Evolution of a Permo-Triassic sedimentary melange, Grindstone terrane, east-central Oregon. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 103:1280–1296.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, G. A. 1957. Permian brachiopods from central Oregon. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 134(12):1–79.Google Scholar
Dall, W. 1882. On the genera of chitons. U.S. National Museum Proceedings, 4:279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, W. H. 1962. Carboniferous formations and faunas of central Montana. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 348, 126 p.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1908. The Guadalupian fauna. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 58, 627 p.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1847. On the genera of the family Chitonidae. Zoological Society Proceedings (London), p. 63–70.Google Scholar
Hahn, G., Hahn, R., Hanger, R. A., and Strong, E. E. In press. Lower Permian trilobites from Oregon, USA. Geologica et Paleontologica.Google Scholar
Hanger, R. A. 1998. Miscellaneous Permian taxa of western North America: paleobiogeographic, paleogeographic, biostratigraphic and paleoecologic implications. Permophiles, 31:12–14.Google Scholar
Hanger, R. A., and Strong, E. E. 1998. Acteonina permiana, a new species from the Permian Coyote Butte Formation, Central Oregon. (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Actaeonidae). Biological Society of Washington Proceedings, 111(4):795–798.Google Scholar
Harbert, W., Hillhouse, J., and Vallier, T. 1995. Paleomagnetism of the Permian Wallowa Terrane; implication for terrane migration and orogeny. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100(7):12,573–12,588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hengstenberg, C. A., Hanger, R. A., Strong, E. E., and Yarnell, J. M. 1997. Paleogeographic significance of arthropods and molluscs of the Early Permian Coyote Butte Formation, central Oregon. Geological Society of America, Abstracts With Programs, 29(3):23.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D., and Mapes, R. H. 1990. Arceodomus prolata n. sp. (Mollusca, Rostroconchia) from the Pennsylvanian of Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 64(3):491–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoare, R. D., and Mapes, R. H. 1995. Relationships of the Devonain Strobilepis and related Pennsylvanian problematica. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 40(2):111–128.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D., and Smith, A. G. 1984. Permian Polyplacophora (Mollusca) from West Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 58(1):82–103.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D., and Sturgeon, M. T. 1976. Arcochiton raymondi n. gen., n. sp. of polyplacophoran from the Pennsylvanian of Ohio. Journal of Paleontology, 50(5):841–845.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D., Mapes, R. H., and Atwater, D. E. 1983. Pennsylvanian Polyplacophora (Mollusca) from Oklahoma and Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 57(5):992–1000.Google Scholar
Howse, R. 1848. A catalogue of the fossils of the Permian System of the counties of Northcumberland and Durham, drawn up at the request of the Tyneside Naturalist's Club. Transactions of the Tyneside Naturalist's Club, 1:219–264.Google Scholar
Jones, D. L. 1990. Synopsis of Late Paleozoic and Mesozoic terrane accretion within the Cordillera of western North America. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, series A, 331:479–486.Google Scholar
Kirkby, J. W. 1859. On the Permian Chitonidae. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 15:607–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, F. 1844. A Synopsis of the Characters of the Carboniferous Limestone Fossils of Ireland. Dublin, 207 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1889. North American Geology and Paleontology. Western Methodist Book Concern, Cincinnati, Ohio, 662 p.Google Scholar
Miller, E. L., Miller, M. M., Stevens, C. H., Wright, J. E., and Madrid, R. 1992. Late Paleozoic paleogeographic and tectonic evolution of the western U. S. Cordillera, p. 57–106. In Burchfiel, B. C., Lipman, P. W., and Zoback, M. L. (eds.), The Cordilleran Orogen: Conterminous U. S. The Geology of North America. Geological Society of America, Volume G-3.Google Scholar
Murchey, B. L., and Jones, D. L. 1994. The environmental and tectonic significance of two coeval Permian radiolarian-sponge associations in eastern Oregon. U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper, 1439:183–198.Google Scholar
Neumeyer, M. 1891. Beitrage zu einer morphologischen Eintheilung der Bivalven. K. Academie der Wissenschaften zu Wien, Denkschriften, 58:701–801.Google Scholar
Pilsbry, H. A. 1900. Polyplacophora, p. 433–436. In Zittel, K. A. (ed.), Text-book of Palaeontology (Eastman translation), Macmillan, London and New York.Google Scholar
Pojeta, J. Jr., and Runnegar, B. 1976. The Paleontology of Rostroconch Mollusks and the Early History of the Phylum Mollusca. U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper, 968, 88 p.Google Scholar
Pojeta, J. Jr., Runnegar, B., Morris, N. J., and Newell, N. D. 1972. Rostroconchia: a new class of bivalved mollusks. Science, 177(4045):264–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raymond, P. E. 1910. A preliminary list of the fauna of the Allegheny and Conemaugh Series in western Pennsylvania. Carnegie Museum Annals, 7(1):144–158.Google Scholar
Ross, C. A., and Ross, J. R. P. 1983. Late Paleozoic accreted terranes of western North America, p. 7–22. In Stevens, C. H. (ed.), Pre-Jurassic Rocks in Western North American Suspect Terranes. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Skinner, J. W., and Wilde, G. L. 1966. Permian fusulinids from Pacific northwest and Alaska, Pt. 2, Permian fusulinids from Suplee area, east-central Oregon. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Paper 4:11–15.Google Scholar
Smith, A. G. 1976. Two new Permian chitons from West Texas (Mollusca: Polyplacophora). The Veliger, 18(3):281–288.Google Scholar
Stevens, C. H., and Rycerski, B. A. 1983. Permian colonial rugose corals in western North America—aids in positioning of suspect terranes, p. 23–36. In Stevens, C. H. (ed.), Pre-jurassic Rocks in Western North American Suspect Terranes. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Stevens, C. H., Yancey, T. E., and Hanger, R. A. 1990. Significance of the provincial signature of Early Permian faunas of the eastern Klamath terrane, p. 201–218. In Harwood, D. S. and Miller, M. M. (eds.), Paleozoic and Mesozoic Paleogeographic Relations; Sierra Nevada, Klamath Mountains, and Related Terranes. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 255.Google Scholar
Thiele, J. 1910. Revision des Systems der Chitonen. Zoologica, 22:1–132.Google Scholar
Wardlaw, B. R., Nestell, M. K., and Dutro, J. T. Jr. 1982. Biostratigraphy and structural setting of the Permian Coyote Butte Formation of central Oregon. Geology, 10:13–16.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. C. 1970. Conocardiaum langenheimi sp. n. (Mollusca: Bivalvia) in the Lower Permian Series of the McCloud Limestone, northern California. Los Angeles County Museum, Contributions in Science, 184:1–14.Google Scholar
Yochelson, E. L. 1971. The Permian nautiloid mandible Rhynchoteuthis kaibabensis reinterpreted as a polyplacophoran. Journal of Paleontology, 45(1):130–133.Google Scholar

A correction has been issued for this article:

Errata

Richard D. Hoare