Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:09:42.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pennsylvanian bivalves from the Ixtaltepec Formation, Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Sara A. Quiroz-Barroso  and
Maria del Carmen Perrilliat
Sara A. Quiroz-Barroso
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510—México, D. F., México
Maria del Carmen Perrilliat
Affiliation:
Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510—México, D. F., México
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Twenty species of bivalves are described from the Ixtaltepec Formation, in Nochixtlán, México. Representatives of the genera Parallelodon, Myalinella, Septimyalina, Leptodesma, Pterinopectinella, Aviculopecten, Limipecten, Streblopteria, Euchondria, Schizodus, Permophorus, Astartella, Edmondia, and Ectogrammysia are present. These species, and those of nuculoid bivalves previously described from the same formation, include infaunal and epifaunal forms that lived in shallow marine environments from Morrowan to Desmoinesian ages. Pennsylvanian bivalves from Nochixtlán are related to the Midcontinent and Appalachian faunas, which indicate that there was an oceanic connection between these areas in a latitudinal belt near the equator that partially covered southeastern Mexico.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 72 , Issue 6 , November 1998 , pp. 1011 - 1024
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, H., and Adams, A. 1854-1858. The Genera of Recent Mollusca Arranged According to Their Organization. Volume 2. London, John Van Voorst, 661 p.Google Scholar
Bronn, H. E. 1849. Handbuch der Geschichte der Natur. Volume 3, Part 3: Index Palaeontologicus. Stuttgart, 976 p.Google Scholar
Brown, T. 1837-1849. Illustrations of the Fossil Conchology of Great Britain and Ireland, 273 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, P. 1987. Microfacies y microfósiles de las rocas carbonatadas del Paleozoico de San Salvador Patlanoaya, Puebla, México. Sociedad Mexicana de Paleontología, Revista 1:7–23.Google Scholar
Busanus, J. W., and Hoare, R. D. 1991. Bivalves (Mollusca) from the Mauch Chunk Group (Mississippian, Chesterian) of northern West Virginia and southwestern Pennsylvania. Journal of Paleontology, 65:465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavan, A. 1954. Les Pleurophorus et genres voisins. Cahiers Géologiques Seyssel, 22, 200 p.Google Scholar
Chronic, J. 1953. Invertebrate paleontology (excepting fusulinids and corals), p. 43–165. In Newell, N. D., Chronic, J., and Roberts, T. G. (eds), Upper Paleozoic of Peru. Geological Society of America Memoir, 58.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1842. Observations on the Silurian and Devonian systems of the United States, with descriptions of new organic remains. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Journal, 8:228–280.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R., Newell, N. D., Branson, C. C., Casey, R., Chavan, A., Coogan, A. H., Dechaseaux, C., Fleming, C. A., Hass, F., Hertlein, L. G., Myra Keen, A., LaRocque, A., McAlester, A. L., Perkins, B. F., Puri, H. S., Smith, L. A., Soot-Ryen, T., Stenzel, H. B., Turner, R. D., and Weir, J. 1969. Systematic Descriptions, p. 225–868. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part N, Mollusca 6. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1889. On the hinge of pelecypods and its development, with an attempt toward a better subdivision of the group. American Journal of Science, 38:445–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1898. Contributions to the Tertiary fauna of Florida with especial reference to the Silex Beds of Tampa and the Pliocene Beds of the Caloosahatchie River. Transactions of the Wagner Free Institute of Science of Philadelphia, 3(4):571–947.Google Scholar
Dunbar, C. O. 1924. Kansas Permian insects, part 1: The geological ocurrence and the environment of the insects. American Journal of Science, 7:171–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, M. K. 1957. Late Mississippian fauna from the Redoak Hollow Formation of southern Oklahoma, Part 3. Journal of Paleontology, 31:737–784.Google Scholar
Frech, F. 1891. Die devonischen Aviculiden Deutschlands. Abhandlungen zur Geologischen Specialkarte von Preussen und den Thüringischen Staaten, 9(3), 253 p.Google Scholar
Geinitz, H. B. 1866. Carbonformation und Dyas in Nebraska: Kaiserliche deutsche Akademie Naturforscher zu Halle. Nova Acta Leopoldina, Dresden, Verhandlung 33, 91 p.Google Scholar
Gibson, M. A., and Gastaldo, R. A. 1987. Invertebrate paleoecology of the Upper Cliff Coal Interval (Pennsylvanian) Plateau Coal Field, Northern Alabama. Journal of Paleontology, 61:439–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1904. New molluscan genera from the Carboniferous. United States National Museum, Proceedings, 27:721–736.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1909. Paleontology of the Manzano Group, p. 41–136. In Lee, W. T., and Girty, G. H., The Manzano Group of the Rio Grande alley, New Mexico. U. S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 389.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1915. Fauna of the Wewoka Formation of Oklahoma. U. S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 544, 353 p.Google Scholar
Goldring, R. 1991. Fossils in the field. Longman Scientific and Technical, England, 218 p.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. Jr., and Pojeta, J. Jr. 1975. Pelecypoda and Rostroconchia of the Amsden Formation (Mississippian and Pennsylvanian) of Wyoming. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 848-E, 24 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. 1858. Lamellibranchiata of the Coal Measures, p. 715–717. In Hall, J., and Whitney, J. D., Report on the Geological Survey of the State of Iowa, embracing the results of investigations made during portions of the years 1855, 1856 and 1857, Volume 1, Part 2, Paleontology, Albany, New York.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1883. Natural history of New York. New York Geological Survey, Paleontology, 5(1):1–20.Google Scholar
Herrick, C. L. 1887. A sketch of the Geological history of Licking Co. (Ohio): Bulletin of the Science Laboratories Denison University, 2:5–70, 144-148.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D. 1961. Desmoinesian Brachiopoda and Mollusca from Southwest Missouri. Missouri University Studies 36, 262 p.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D. 1993. Mississippian (Chesterian) bivalves from the Pennsylvanian stratotype area in West Virginia and Virginia. Journal of Paleontology, 67:374–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoare, R. D., Heaney, M. J. III, and Mapes, R. H. 1989. Bivalves (Mollusca) from the Imo Formation (Mississippian, Chesterian)of north-central Arkansas. Journal of Paleontology, 63:582–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoare, R. D., Sturgeon, M. T., and Kindt, E. A. 1979. Pennsylvanian Marine Bivalvia and Rostroconchia of Ohio. Ohio Geological Survey Bulletin, 67, 77 p.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. G. 1960. Interspecific associations in Pennsylvanian fossil assemblages. Journal of Geology, 70:32–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, W. 1850. A monograph of the Permian fossils of England. Palaeontographical Society, Monograph 3, 258 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koninck, L. G. de 1841-1844. Description des animaux fossiles qui se trouvent dans le terrain Carbonifère de Belgique, p. 58–146, H. Dessain, Liége.Google Scholar
Kues, B. S. 1991. Some pelecypods and scaphopods from the Lower Wolfcampian (basal Permian) Laborcita Formation, Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico. New Mexico Geological Society, Guidebook 42, p. 231–242.Google Scholar
Kues, B. S. 1992. A Late Pennsylvanian restricted-marine fauna from the Kinney Quarry, Manzanita Mountains, New Mexico. New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Bulletin 138, p. 87–97.Google Scholar
Kues, B. S. 1996. Guide to the Late Pennsylvanian paleontology of the Upper Madera Formation, Jemez Springs Area, North-Central New Mexico. New Mexico Geological Society, Guidebook 47, p. 169–188.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema Naturae, (tenth edition). Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm, 823 p.Google Scholar
Lintz, J. Jr. 1958. The Fauna of the Ames and Brush Creek Shales of the Conemaugh Formation of Western Maryland. Journal of Paleontology, 32:97–112.Google Scholar
Mark, C. G. 1912. The fossils of the Conemaugh Formation in Ohio, p. 261–326. In Condit, D. D., Conemaugh Formation in Ohio. Ohio Geological Survey Bulletin, 17.Google Scholar
Mather, K. F. 1915. The fauna of the Morrow Group of Arkansas and Oklahoma. Bulletin of the Science Laboratories Denison University, 18:59–284.Google Scholar
McKerrow, W. S. 1978. The Ecology of Fossils. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 383 p.Google Scholar
M'Coy, F. 1844. A synopsis of the characters of the Carboniferous limestone fossils of Ireland. Privately published, 271 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M'Coy, F. 1851. Description of some new Mountain Limestone fossils. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Second Series, 7:167–175.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1872. Report on the paleontology of eastern Nebraska, with some remarks on the Carboniferous rocks of that district, p. 83–239. In Hayden, F. V., Final report of the United States Geological Survey of Nebraska and portions of adjacent territories. United States 42nd Congress, first session, House Executive Document, 19.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1874. New genus Euchondria Meek. American Journal of Science, Third Series, 7:445.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Hayden, F. V. 1858. Description of new organic remains from northeastern Kansas, indicating the existence of Permian rocks in that territory. Albany Institute Transactions, 4:73–78.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Hayden, F. V. 1864. Paleontology of the Upper Missouri. A report upon collections made principally by the expedition under command of Lieut. Warren, G. K., Top, U. S. Engrs., in 1855 and 1856. Invertebrates. Part I. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, 172, 135 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1866. Description of Paleozoic fossils from the Silurian, Devonian and Carboniferous rocks of Illinois, and other western states. Chicago Academy of Sciences Proceedings, 1, p. 11–23.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1873. Paleontology (of Illnois). Descriptions of invertebrates from the Carboniferous System. Illinois Geological Survey, 5:321–619.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1877. The American Paleozoic Fossils, a Catalogue of the Genera and Species. Cincinnati. 253 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1889. North American Geology and Paleontology. Cincinnati, 664 p.Google Scholar
Morales-Soto, S. 1984. Estudio paleoecológico del Paleozoico Superior (Pensilvánico) de Santiago Ixtaltepec, Oaxaca. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Ciencias, Tesis profesional, 53 p.Google Scholar
Morningstar, H. 1922. The Pottsville Fauna of Ohio. Ohio Geological Survey Bulletin, 25, 312 p.Google Scholar
Moron-Rios, A., and Perrilliat, M. C. 1988. Una especie nueva del género Griffithides Portlock (Arthropoda, Trilobita) del Paleozoico superior de Oaxaca. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Institute de Geología, Revista 7:67–70.Google Scholar
Mudge, M. R., and Yochelson, E. L. 1962. Stratigraphy and paleontology of the uppermost Pennsylvanian and lowermost Permian rocks in Kansas. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 323, 213 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1937. Late Paleozoic Pelecypods: Pectinacea. Kansas Geological Survey, Volume 10, Part 1, 123 p.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1942. Late Paleozoic Pelecypods. Mytilacea: Kansas Geological Survey, Volume 10, Part 2, 115 p.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1965. Classification of the Bivalvia. American Museum Novitates, 2206, 25 p.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1969. Classification of Bivalvia, p. N205–N218. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part N, Mollusca 6(1). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D., and Boyd, D. W. 1975. Parallel evolution in early trigoniacean bivalves. American Museum of Natural History, Bulletin, 154:57–162.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. de, 1843-1847. Mollusques, quatrième classe, Lamellibranchia. Paléontologie Francaise, Volume 3, 807 p.Google Scholar
Ortiz-Lozano, J. A. 1996. Consideraciones paleoambientales y morfológicas de las colonias de briozoarios pensilvánicos de la Formación Ixtaltepec en la región de Nochixtlán, Oaxaca. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Ciencias, Tesis Profesional, 40 p.Google Scholar
Pantoja-Alor, J. 1970. Rocas sedimentarias paleozoicas de la region centro-septentrional de Oaxaca, p. 67–84. In Segura, L. R., and Rodríguez-Torres, T. (eds.), Excursión México-Oaxaca. Sociedad Geológica Mexicana, Libreto-guía, México.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. 1936. Illustrations of the geology of Yorkshire, part 2, The Mountain Limestone district. John Murray, London, 253 p.Google Scholar
Poel, L. van de. 1959. Faune malacologique du Hervien. Institut Royal Des Sciences Naturelles De Belgique, Bulletin, 35(15,16):1–26, 1-28.Google Scholar
Quiroz-Barroso, S. A., and Perrilliat, M. C. 1997. Pennsylvanian nuculoids (Bivalvia) from the Ixtaltepec Formation, Oaxaca, México. Journal of Paleontology, 71(3):400–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renjie, Z., and Daoping, Y. 1993. Stratigraphic and paleobiogeographic summary of Carboniferous marine bivalves of China. Journal of Paleontology, 67:850–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Benítez, J. L. 1983. Estudio Palinoestratigráfico de las Formaciones Paleozoicas Tiñú, Santiago e Ixtaltepec, de la Región de Nochixtlán, Oaxaca. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, ESIA. Tesis Profesional, 117 p.Google Scholar
Shumard, B. F., and Swallow, G. C. 1858. Descriptions of new fossils from the Coal Measures of Missouri and Kansas. St. Louis Academy of Sciences Transactions, 1:198–227.Google Scholar
Silva-Pineda, A. 1970. Fructificación de pteridosperma en el Pensilvánico de Oaxaca. Sociedad Geológica Mexicana, Primera Convención Nacional, Resúmenes, p. 85–86.Google Scholar
Sour-Tovar, F. 1994. Braquiópodos pensilvánicos del área de Santiago Ixtaltepec, Municipio de Nochixtlán, Oaxaca. Unpublished , , 55 p.Google Scholar
Sour-Tovar, F., and Quiroz-Barroso, S. A. 1989. Braquiópodos pensilvánicos (Strophomenida) de la Formación Ixtaltepec, Santiago Ixtaltepec, Oaxaca. Sociedad Mexicana de Paleontología, Revista 2:5–17.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. de C. 1821-1825. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain, London, 5, 168 p.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1972. Functional morphology and evolution of bissally attached bivalve mollusks. Journal of Paleontology, 46:165–212.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1989. Earth and Life Through Time. Second Edition. Freeman and Company, New York, 689 p.Google Scholar
Stoliczka, F. 1870-1871. Cretaceous fauna of southern India: 3. The Pelecypoda. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India. Palaeontologia Indica, 537 p.Google Scholar
Strickland, H. E., and Buckman, J. 1845. Outline of the Geology of Chetelham by R. I. Murchison, A New Edition Augmented and Revised by James Buckman and H. E. Strickland, London, p. 1–109.Google Scholar
Thomas, H. D. 1928. An upper Carboniferous fauna from the Amotape Mountains, northwestern Peru. Geological Magazine, 65:146–152; 215-234; 289-301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verneuil, E. de 1845. Mollusques, p. 37–376. In Murchison, R. I., de Verneuil, E. and de Keyserling, A.Gélogie de la Russie d’ Europe, 2(3).Google Scholar
Verneuil, E. de, and Murchison, R. I. 1844. Note sur les équivalents du système permien en Europe, suivie d'un coup d'oeil général sur l'ensemble de ses fossiles, et d'un tableau des especes. Société Géologique de France Bulletin, Second Series, Volume 1, 505 p.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1876. Invertebrate paleontology of the plateau province, p. 74–135. In Powell, J. W., Report on the geology of the eastern portion of the Uinta Mountains: U. S. Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories.Google Scholar
Worthen, A. H. 1890. Description of fossil invertebrates. Illinois Geological Survey, 8:69–154.Google Scholar