Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:18:45.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Origin and early evolution of the amniote occiput

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

David S Berman
David S Berman*
Affiliation:
Section of Vertebrate Paleontology, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 4400 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213–4080,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Reinterpretation of cranial materials of the diadectomorphs Limnoscelis and Diadectes has prompted a reconsideration of the origin and early evolution of the amniote occiput. The basic approach is a phylogenetic study of major groups of Paleozoic tetrapods based on the occiput and closely associated elements of the skull roof. A lack of adequate anatomical data has forced the elimination of only a few relevant higher-level taxa from consideration, and, using Acanthostega as the reference outgroup, a cladistic analysis of the interrelationships of the Lepospondyli, Temnospondyli, Seymouriamorpha, Baphetidae (= Loxommatidae), Anthracosauria, Diadectomorpha, Synapsida, and Reptilia has produced the following results: 1) the ingroup taxa exhibit a basal dichotomy in which one division consists of the unresolved relationships of Lepospondyli, Temnospondyli, and Seymouriamorpha; 2) the pattern of relationships of the second division of the ingroup taxa is a series of nested clades, terminating with the Diadectomorpha and Synapsida as sister taxa sharing a more recent common ancestor than either does with Reptilia. This relationship requires assignment of Diadectomorpha to Amniota; and 3) the Anthracosauria and Baphetidae are progressively more distant clades or sister taxa. On the basis of the cladistic analysis, the attainment of the amniote occiput is described as passing through four morphological grades of organization. Each grade of the series is characterized by a set of derived character states that defines the progressively more-derived nodes and from which branch a clade containing the unresolved trichotomy of Lepospondyli, Temnospondyli, and Seymouriamorpha; the Baphetidae clade; the Anthracosauria clade; and the Diadectomorpha + Synapsida and Reptilia clades, respectively.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 74 , Issue 5 , September 2000 , pp. 938 - 956
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beaumont, E. H. 1977. Cranial morphology of the Loxommatidae (Amphibia: Labyrinthodontia). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Series B, 280:29–101.Google Scholar
Beerbower, J. R. 1963. Morphology, paleoecology, and phylogeny of the Permo-Carboniferous amphibian Diploceraspis . Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 130:31–108.Google Scholar
Berman, D. S., and Sumida, S. S. 1990. A new species of Limnoscelis (Amphibia, Diadectomorpha) from the Late Pennsylvanian Sangre de Cristo Formation of central Colorado. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 59:303–341.Google Scholar
Berman, D. S., Reisz, R. R., and Eberth, D. A. 1985. Seymouria sanjuanensis (Amphibia, Batrachosauria) from the Lower Permian Cutler Formation of north-central New Mexico and the occurrence of sexual dimorphism in that genus questioned. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 24:1769–1784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, D. S., Reisz, R. R., and Fracasso, M. A. 1981. Skull of the Lower Permian dissorophid amphibian Platyhystrix rugosus . Annals of Carnegie Museum, 50:391–416.Google Scholar
Berman, D. S., Sumida, S. S., and Lombard, R. E. 1992. Reinterpretation of the temporal and occipital regions in Diadectes and the relationships of diadectomorphs. Journal of Paleontology, 66:481–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, D. S., Sumida, S. S., and Martens, T. 1998. Diadectes (Diadectomorpha: Diadectidae) from the Early Permian of central Germany, with description of new species. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 63:53–93.Google Scholar
Berman, D. S., Reisz, R. R., Bolt, J. R., and Scott, D. 1995. The cranial anatomy and relationships of the synapsid Varanosaurus (Eupelycosauria: Ophiacodontidae) from the Early Permian of Texas and Oklahoma. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 64:99–133.Google Scholar
Boy, J., and Bandel, K. 1973. Bruktererpeton fiebigi n. gen., n. sp. (Amphibia: Gephyrostegida) der erste Tetrapode aus dem rheinischwestfaelischen Karbon (Namur B; W. Deutschland). Palaeontographica, Abteilung A, 145:39–77.Google Scholar
Bystrow, A. P. 1944. On Kotlassia prima (Amalitsky). Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 55:379–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1967. An adelogyrinid lepospondyl amphibian from the Upper Carboniferous. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 45:1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1968. The postcranial skeleton of the Permian microsaur Pantylus . Canadian Journal of Zoology, 46:1175–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1969a. Problems of the origin of reptiles. Biological Reviews, 44:393–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1969b. A Middle Pennsylvanian captorhinomorph and the interrelationships of primitive reptiles. Journal of Paleontology, 43:151–170.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1970. The ancestry of reptiles. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 257:267–308.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1986. The skeletal anatomy and some aspects of the physiology of primitive reptiles, p. 25–45. In Hotton, N., MacLean, P. D., Roth, J. J., and Roth, E. C. (eds.), The Ecology and Biology of Mammal-like Reptiles. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1991. The origin of reptiles, p. 331–353. In Schultze, H.-P. and Trueb, L. (eds.), Origins of the Higher Groups of Tetrapods: Controversy and Consensus. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1995. Problems of the phylogenetic analysis of Paleozoic choanates. Bulletin of the Museum of Natural History, Paris, 17:389–445.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1998. Cranial anatomy of ophiderpetonid aïstopods: Palaeozoic limbless amphibians. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 122:143–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, R. L., and Baird, D. 1972. Carboniferous stem-reptiles of the family Romeriidae. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 143:321–364.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L., and Chorn, J. 1995. Vertebral development in the oldest microsaur and the problem of “lepospondyl” relationships. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 15:37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, R. L., and Gaskill, P. 1978. The Order Microsauria. Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society, 126:1–211.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L., Bossy, K. A., Milner, A. C., Andrews, S. M., and Wellstead, C. F. 1998. Lepospondyli: Microsauria, Nectridea, Lysorophia, Adelospondyli, Aïstopoda, Acherontiscidae. Handbuch der Palaoherpetologie. Teil 1, Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München, 216 p.Google Scholar
Clack, J. A. 1987a. Pholiderpeton scutigerum Huxley, an amphibian from the Yorkshire Coal Measures. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Series B, 318:1–107.Google Scholar
Clack, J. A. 1987b. Two new specimens of Anthracosaurus (Amphibia: Anthracosauria) from the Northumberland Coal Measures. Palaeontology, 30:15–26.Google Scholar
Clack, J. A. 1988. New material of the early tetrapod Acanthostega from the Upper Devonian of east Greenland. Palaeontology, 31:699–724.Google Scholar
Clack, J. A. 1994. Earliest known tetrapod braincase and the evolution of the stapes and fenestra ovalis. Nature, 369:392–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clack, J. A. 1996. The palate of Crassigyrinus scoticus, a primitive tetrapod from the Lower Carboniferous of Scotland. Special Papers in Palaeontology, No. 52, 55–64 p.Google Scholar
Clack, J. A. 1998. The neurocranium of Acanthostega gunnari Jarvik and the evolution of the otic region in tetrapods. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 122:61–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clack, J. A., and Coates, M. I. 1995. Acanthostega gunnari, a primitive aquatic tetrapod? In Arsenault, M., Lelievre, H. and Janvier, P. (eds.), Studies on Early Vertebrates, 7th International Symposium. Bulletin du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, 17:359–372.Google Scholar
Clack, J. A., and Holmes, R. 1988. The braincase of the anthracosaur Archeria crassidisca with comments on the interrelationships of primitive tetrapods. Palaeontology, 31:85–107.Google Scholar
Clark, J., and Carroll, R. L. 1973. Romeriid reptiles from the Lower Permian. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 144:353–407.Google Scholar
Coates, M. I., and Clack, J. A. 1995. Romer's gap: Tetrapod origins and terrestriality, p. 373, 388. In Arsenault, M., Lelievre, H., and Janvier, P. (eds.), Studies on Early Vertebrates, Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 17.Google Scholar
de Beer, G. R. 1937. The Development of the Vertebrate Skull. Oxford Press, London, 552 p.Google Scholar
Fracasso, M. A. 1983. Cranial osteology, functional morphology, systematics and paleoenvironment of Limnoscelis paludis Williston. Unpublishcd Ph.D. dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, 624 p.Google Scholar
Fracasso, M. A. 1987. Braincase of Limnoscelis paludis Williston. Postilla, 201:1–22.Google Scholar
Gauthier, J. A., Kluge, A. G., and Rowe, T. 1988. The early evolution of the Amniota, p. 103–155. In Benton, M. J. (ed.), The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, Vol. 1, Amphibians, Reptiles and Birds. Systematics Association Special Volume 35A. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Heaton, M. J. 1980. The Cotylosauria: a reconsideration of a group of archaic tetrapods, p. 497–551. In Panchen, A. L. (ed.), The Terrestrial Environment and the Origin of Land Vertebrates. Systematics Association Special Volume Number 15, Academic Press, New York and London.Google Scholar
Holmes, R. 1984. The Carboniferous amphibian Proterogyrinus scheelei Romer, and the early evolution of tetrapods. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Series B, 306:431–524.Google Scholar
Holmes, R. 1989. The skull and axial skeleton of the Lower Permian anthracosauroid amphibian Archeria crassidisca Cope. Palaeontolgraphica, Abteilung A, 207:161–206.Google Scholar
Klembara, J. 1997. The cranial anatomy of Discosauriscus Kuhn, a seymouriamorph tetrapod from the Lower Permian of Boskovice Furrow (Czech Republic). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Series B, 352:257–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurin, M. 1995. Comparative cranial anatomy of Seymouria sanjuanensis (Tetrapoda: Batrachosauria) from the Lower Permian of Utah and New Mexico. PaleoBios, 16:1–8.Google Scholar
Laurin, M. 1996. A redescription of the cranial anatomy of Seymouria baylorensis, the best known seymouriamorph (Vertebrata: Seymouriamorpha). PaleoBios, 17:1–16.Google Scholar
Laurin, M. 1998. The importance of global parsimony and historical bias in understanding tetrapod evolution. Part I. Systematics, middle ear evolution and jaw suspension. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, 1:1–42, Elsevier, Paris.Google Scholar
Laurin, M., and Reisz, R. R. 1995. A reevaluation of early amniote phylogeny. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 113:165–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurin, M., and Reisz, R. R. 1997. A new perspective on tetrapod phylogeny, p. 9–59. In Sumida, S. S. and Martin, K. L. M. (eds.), Amniote Origins. Academic Press, London, 510 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M. Y. S., and Spencer, P. 1997. Crown-clades, key characters and taxonomic stability: when is an amniote not an amniote?, p. 61–84. In Sumida, S. S. and Martin, K. L. M. (eds.), Amniote Origins. Academic Press, London, 510 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombard, R., and Bolt, J. R. 1995. A new primitive tetrapod, Whatcheeria deltae, from the Lower Carboniferous of Iowa. Palaeontology, 38:471–494.Google Scholar
Lund, R. 1978. Anatomy and relationships of the family Phlegethontidae (Amphibia, Aïstopoda). Annals of Carnegie Museum, 47:53–79.Google Scholar
McGinnis, H. 1967. The osteology of Phlegethontia, a Carboniferous and Permian aïstopod amphibian. University of California Publications in Geology, 71:1–49.Google Scholar
Milner, A. C. 1980. A review of the Nectridea (Amphibia), p. 377–405. In Panchen, A. (ed.), The Terrestrial Environment and the Origin of Land Vertebrates. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Milner, A. C., and Lindsay, W. 1998. Postcranial remains of Baphetes and their bearing on the relationships of the Baphetidae (= Loxommatidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 122:211–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donoghue, C. H. 1921. The blood vascular system of tuatara, Sphenodon punctatus . Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Series B, 210:175–252.Google Scholar
Panchen, A. L. 1964. The cranial anatomy of two coal measure anthracosaurs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Series B, 247:593–637.Google Scholar
Panchen, A. L. 1970. Anthracosauria. Handbuch der Paläoherpetologie. Teil 5a. Fischer, Stuttgart, 84 p.Google Scholar
Panchen, A. L. 1972a. The interrelationships of the earliest tetrapods, p. 65–87. In Joysey, K. A. and Kemp, T. S. (eds.), Studies in Vertebrate Evolution-Essays Presented to Dr. F. R. Parrington F. R. S. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Panchen, A. L. 1972b. The skull and skeleton of Eogyrinus attheyi Watson (Amphibia: Labyrinthodontia). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Series B, 263:279–326.Google Scholar
Panchen, A. L. 1973. On Crassigyrinus scoticus Watson, a primitive amphibian from the Lower Carboniferous of Scotland. Palaeontology, 16:179–193.Google Scholar
Panchen, A. L. 1975. A new genus and species of anthracosaur amphibian from the Lower Carboniferous of Scotland and the status of Pholidogaster pisciformis Huxley. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Series B, 269:581–640.Google Scholar
Panchen, A. L. 1977. On Anthracosaurus russelli Huxley (Amphibia: Labyrinthodontia) and the family Anthracosauridae. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Series B, 279:447–512.Google Scholar
Panchen, A. L. 1980. The origin and relationships of the anthracosaur amphibia from the Late Paleozoic, p. 319–350. In Panchen, A. L. (ed.), The Terrestrial Environment and the Origin of Land Vertebrates. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Panchen, A. L. 1985. On the amphibian Crassigyrinus scoticus Watson from the Carboniferous of Scotland. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Series B, 309:505–568.Google Scholar
Panchen, A. L., and Smithson, T. R. 1988. The relationships of the earliest tetrapods, p. 1–32. In Benton, M. J. (ed.), The Phylogeny and Classification of Tetrapods, Vol. 1: Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds. Systematics Association Special Volume No. 35A. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Reisz, R. R. 1972. Pelycosaurian reptiles from the Middle Pennsylvanian of North America. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 144:27–61.Google Scholar
Reisz, R. R. 1981. A diapsid reptile from the Pennsylvanian of Kansas. Special Publication of the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas, No. 7, 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisz, R. R. 1986. Pelycosauria. Handbuch der Paleoherpetologie. Teil 17A. Fisher, Stuttgart, 102 p.Google Scholar
Reisz, R. R., Berman, D., and Scott, D. 1992. The cranial anatomy and relationships of Secodontosaurus, an unusual mammal-like reptile (Synapsida: Sphenacodontidae) from the Early Permian of Texas. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 104:127–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, A. S. 1946. The primitive reptile Limnoscelis restudied. American Journal of Science, 244:149–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, A. S. 1969. The cranial anatomy of the Permian amphibian Pantylus . Breviora, 314:1–37.Google Scholar
Romer, A. S., and Price, L. W. 1941. Review of the Pelycosauria. Geological Society of America Special Paper, No. 28, 538 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, A. S., and Witter, R. V. 1942. Edops, a primitive rhachitomous amphibian from the Texas redbeds. Journal of Geology, 50:925–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawin, H. J. 1941. The cranial anatomy of Eryops megacephalus . Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard College, 88:407–463.Google Scholar
Schultze, H.-P., and Foreman, B. 1981. A new gymnarthrid microsaur from the Lower Permian of Kansas with a review of the tuditanomorph microsaurs (Amphibia). Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, 91:1–25.Google Scholar
Smithson, T. R. 1982. The cranial morphology of Greererpeton burkemorani Romer (Amphibia: Temnospondyli). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 76:29–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithson, T. R. 1985. The morphology and relationships of the Carboniferous amphibian Eoherpeton watsoni Panchen. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 85:317–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithson, T. R., Carroll, R. L., Panchen, A. L., and Andrews, S. M. 1994. Westlothiana lizziae from the Viséan of East Kirkton, West Lothian, Scotland, and the amniote stem. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Earth Sciences, 84:383–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumida, S., and Lombard, R. E. 1991. The atlas-axis complex in the late Paleozoic genus Diadectes and the characteristics of the atlas-axis complex across the amphibian to amniote transition. Journal of Paleontology, 65:973–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swofford, D. L. 1993. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. Champaign, Illinois, Illinois Natural History Survey.Google Scholar
Thomson, K. S., and Bossy, K. H. 1970. Adaptive trends and relationships in early Amphibia. Forma et Functio, 3:7–31.Google Scholar
Wellstead, C. F. 1982. A Lower Carboniferous aïstopod amphibian from Scotland. Palaeontology, 25:193–208.Google Scholar
Wellstead, C. F. 1991. Taxonomic revision of the Lysorophia, Permo-Carboniferous lepospondyl amphibians. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 209:1–90.Google Scholar